Analysis Of Beth Cavener's Don T Go

641 Words2 Pages

The sculpture, Don’t Go, is composed by Beth Cavener. Creativity has always
been in the family, her mother was an art teacher. She actually went to college for
science, and her last semester changed over to the arts. After finishing college for arts,
she went on to apprentice for sculptor Alan Lequire. She was then drawn to the
surrealist movement of the 1920’s. When she was finished with her masters she spent
her residency at the Archie Bray Foundation and the Clay Studio in Philadelphia. She
worked on life-size and larger scale works. Cavener is now 45 years old, and working
as a full time artist in Montana. (Cola) She is known for her style of stoneware animal
sculptures. Don’t Go is a baby bunny that represents the emotions of when a child is
separated from their parents. …show more content…

This
representational piece is a bunny that looks like it is scared, and looks as if it is cuddled
up trying to escape a certain emotion. The arms are in close and the ears are pointed
down. Subject matter goes along with parenting experience for Cavener. Parenting
experience plays a tremendous role in this piece. The emotion in the sculpture comes
Eklund 3
from the emotions she feels for her 6 month year old baby. Cavener saw the fear that
was installed in her baby when her and her husband would leave. She could tell that the
asbense caused him stress and was overwhelming. Doing the piece made her confront
the fears she had for herself. Being an adult still comes with the feeling with
abandonment, and having so many people around you but still feeling lonely. (Cavener)
This is a theme that plays throughout most of her work. Another important factor in
Don’t Go is cool monochromatic harmony.
Cavener uses many different visual elements to help the person understand the
concept of the piece. One visual element is monochromatic harmony. Monochromatic
harmony is using one single base hue and then using the different shades and hints

Open Document