Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Contributions of Abraham Lincoln to politics
Lincoln movie analysis
Lincoln movie analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Contributions of Abraham Lincoln to politics
During week nine of class, we watched the 1940 film, Abe Lincoln in Illinois, written by Robert E. Sherwood. As we continued to look at the most precise version of Abraham Lincoln each week, the one theme that stood out over the rest in this film was Lincoln’s reluctance throughout his political career, specifically on the issue of slavery. Although previous readings had glossed over this characteristic of Lincoln, Sherwood’s film even goes as far as to coordinate Abe’s reluctant attitude with the overall darkness of the background and clothing of the characters the more this trait is expressed. Mr. Sherwood’s choice to exemplify this aspect of President Lincoln was due to the World War Two era in which it was produced. Unlike previous weeks, …show more content…
One reading states that the President was a “pretend…politician” and was more “a man of humble origins” (Donald, p.58-59). By directly stating these things the author showed that the lack of political experience was correlated with where he was born and raised. In a way, the author is using Abe’s humble, log home roots to justify the fact that he was timid in terms of fighting against slavery while in office, and thus creating the President’s reluctant attitude. Again, there is evidence of relating the material in the reading to the World War Two era in which it was written to demonstrate reluctance. Just as the reading uses Mr. Lincoln’s humble origins to support their message of his unwilling stance in politics, the film, Abe Lincoln in Illinois, uses a sense of darkness in clothing and scenery to accompany this version of Lincoln. For example, when Mr. and Mrs. Lincoln got into a huge argument, instigated by Abe’s unenthusiastic behavior, Mrs. Lincoln is portrayed as having on dark clothing as she battles it out with Mr. Lincoln. Shortly after this, everyone begins to cheer because they found out that Lincoln was just elected to be the next president, but the camera focused on Abe and the background around him appears darker and people stop cheering because they saw him sulking instead cheering. Overall, both the readings and the film use other characteristics and lack of lighting to draw out this week’s disinclined version of Abraham
Dilorenzo, Thomas J.. The Real Lincoln: a new look at Abraham Lincoln, his agenda, and an unnecessary war. Roseville, Calif: Prima, 2002
leading up to and surrounding President Abraham Lincoln’s death. The purpose of this book is to
Disapproval, the Confederacy, and slavery were amongst the many crises Abraham Lincoln faced when addressing his First Inaugural speech (Lincoln, First Inaugural, p.37). Above all, Lincoln’s speech was stepping on the boundaries of the southern slave states. Once states began to secede, new territories formed and the disapproval of Lincoln grew. Despite Lincoln’s attempts of unifying the antislavery and confederate views, many whites refused to follow his untraditional beliefs. Lincoln encountered hostile and admirable emotions from the people of the Union and the Confederacy. However, despite his representation of the Union, not everyone agreed with his views.
In “The Presidency of Abraham Lincoln,” Phillip Shaw Paludan argues that even though Abraham Lincoln faced unparalleled challenges, Lincoln was America’s greatest president as he preserved the Union and freed the slaves. According to Paludan, Lincoln’s greatness exceeds that of all other American presidents as Lincoln’s presidential service was remarkable in both the obstacles he faced as well as the ways in which he overcame them. Before accepting the distinguished chair in Lincoln studies at the University of Illinois, Springfield, Paludan was a professor of history at the University of Kansas for over 30 years. Paludan has authored several books including Victims: A True Story of the Civil War and A People’s Contest: The Union and Civil
James Oakes gave a brilliant and unique perspective to a relationship between two well known historical figures of their time. Abraham Lincoln is a well-admired president for the United States because as Americans culture teaches that he was an honest and well-respected man. He heard about a young African American man, who had high aspirations for his life and the blossoming United States. This man’s name was Frederick Douglass. James Oakes demonstrates how both Douglass and Lincoln worked towards the abolishment of slavery and effectively producing better outcomes within antislavery politics.
Abraham Lincoln’s original views on slavery were formed through the way he was raised and the American customs of the period. Throughout Lincoln’s influential years, slavery was a recognized and a legal institution in the United States of America. Even though Lincoln began his career by declaring that he was “anti-slavery,” he was not likely to agree to instant emancipation. However, although Lincoln did not begin as a radical anti-slavery Republican, he eventually issued his Emancipation Proclamation, which freed all slaves and in his last speech, even recommended extending voting to blacks. Although Lincoln’s feeling about blacks and slavery was quite constant over time, the evidence found between his debate with Stephen A. Douglas and his Gettysburg Address, proves that his political position and actions towards slavery have changed profoundly.
Although it may be hard to believe, Lincoln was rejected by his own family. His father couldn't stand to look at Lincoln. He tried very hard to please his father but was not successful. His mother put him with her hairpins and sweethearts, dance slippers, and torn paper roses. She didn't think of her own child as anymore important than these insignificant objects. His parents didn't love him because of the way he looked. Holidays with his family were ruined because his family members couldn't believe that he was so ugly. They felt resentment about him.
. .’, concludes James Oakes’ book with the aftermath of the Civil War and Lincoln’s assassination. Oakes discussed the respect Douglass gathered for Lincoln over the years and the affect his assassination had on both himself and America as a whole. Oakes even brushed over Douglass’ relationship with Andrew Johnson, the president succeeding Lincoln. Analyzing his experience with the new president, it was safe to say that Andrew Johnson had no consideration as to what Douglass and Lincoln previously fought for. Johnson did not have the same political skills as Lincoln did, and he did not retain the same view for America that Lincoln did. It was obvious that Douglass held Lincoln at a higher standard than Andrew Johnson, stating that he was a “progressive man, a humane man, an honorable man, and at heart an anti-slavery man” (p. 269). Oakes even gave his own stance on Andrew Jackson, “It was a legacy that Andrew Johnson could ever match. When all of Lincoln’s attributes were taken into consideration - his ascent from the obscurity to greatness, his congenial temperament, his moral courage - it was easy for Douglass to imagine how much better things would be ‘had Mr. Lincoln been living today’.” (p. 262). It is hard to imagine the pre-war Douglass to have said something like that as opposed to an older, much more reserved Douglass. With the abolishment of slavery, so came much discrimination. Without
David Herbert Donald's Lincoln is a biography of our sixteenth President, Abraham Lincoln. At the age of twenty one, he was sure he did not want to be like his father Thomas Lincoln, an uneducated farmer, so he left his fathers house permanently. He had many jobs, learned many lessons, and made both friends and enemies, all which helped him to become one of the greatest presidents of the United States of America during the time the country had split, the Civil War. Thoroughly researched and excellently written, this biography comes alive and shows us what really happened during the early to mid-nineteenth century and it still puts us in the point of view of our former president, using the information and ideas available to him.
During the Abraham Lincoln’s short time as president, he managed not only to save a nation deeply divided and at war with itself, but to solidify the United States of America as a nation dedicated to the progress of civil rights. Years after his death, he was awarded the title of ‘The Great Emancipator.’ In this paper, I will examine many different aspects of Lincoln’s presidency in order to come to a conclusion: whether this title bestowed unto Lincoln was deserved, or not. In order to fully understand Lincoln, it is necessary to understand the motives that drove this man to action. While some of his intentions may not have been for the welfare of slaves, but for the preservation of the Union, the actions still stand. Abraham Lincoln, though motivated by his devotion to his nation, made the first blows against the institution of slavery and rightfully earned his title of ‘The Great Emancipator.’
Abraham Lincoln is widely regarded as “The Great Emancipator,” His legacy as the man who freed the slaves, and the savior of the Union is one that fails to be forgotten. He is thought of as a hero, and one of the few to tackle slavery, a problem that has existed in many parts of the world at one time or another. Although Lincoln is credited with ending slavery, his political motives for confronting this issue and his personal views do not make him worthy of all the recognition he receives; the driven abolitionists and daring slaves deserve a much greater portion of the credit.
In his work, The Real Lincoln, economic historian Thomas J. DiLorenzo tells quite the different tale. Daring to criticize this beloved president, DiLorenzo defends his antithetical statements with several key points: Lincoln was more similar to a dictator than an American President. Arguing that the War Between the States was wholly unconstitutional, DiLorenzo corrects the popular misconception that Lincoln’s war was one of abolition. War was not necessary to end slavery, but it was necessary to fulfill Lincoln’s true agenda – to destroy the most significant check on the powers of the central government: the right of secession.1
Abraham Lincoln (12 Feb. 1809-15 Apr. 1865) the 16th president (civilwar.org) of the United States of America was one of the main public persons that influence the civil war in many aspects. Even though the civil war may have been the last resource the nation had, it could be argue that Lincoln’s governments try its best to find a different solution. The civil war was a conflict that destroyed the nation; it perhaps could have been avoided if the second party had work for a solution. But it is true that maybe both parts could have looked out for the benefits of the people as a whole instead of their personal benefits. Lincoln principal positive effect on the civil war was actually before and during the war when Lincoln’s government had many attempts to prevent the confrontation, and when this one began he took the right decisions to win the war. One of the biggest effects on the civil war was the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863, which gave the slaves their liberty. Many would agree is that Abraham’s Lincoln effect on the civil war was positive but Lincoln made many mistakes or misjudgments during the war as well. Perhaps the biggest mistake Lincoln did was underestimating the South what caused many unnecessary deaths. He also did had misjudgments that cause many causalities. Since the beginning of time humanity has fought for what they thought was right. In April 12 of 1861(civilwar.org) The US would begin a fight for civic and moral rights, a civil war that perhaps was the last option for a country to reunite its values. Abraham Lincoln was the president of the time and the person the influence the most the course the war took. I strongly believe that Lincoln’s decisions influence or had more positive effects on the country. Being the president at times like the civil war is without doubt it is one of the toughest jobs, and one way or another there is going to be correct and incorrect decisions but I can agree president Lincoln did what he thought it was the best at that moment.
The movie Lincoln, made by Steven Spielberg, is a movie that takes after the political parts around 4 months before the end of the Civil War and Lincoln's life. As he attempts to get endorse of the Thirteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which would pass on a conclusion to subjection and unlawful programmed subjugation in the United States. Spielberg, not in the least like other irrefutable boss, has successfully portrayed Abraham Lincoln from a couple of focuses; the defensive Lincoln who takes care of his youngsters and in addition can be normal, the mate who's calling puts weight on his relationship, the charming and strong talked speaker, trying to deliberately prompt congressmen for votes for the Amendment, the understanding military authority, endeavoring to settle on the best decisions for the War, and the concentrated on president, who
Movie Lincoln, directed by Steven Spielberg, is based on the true story of US President Abraham Lincoln’s struggle to get the 13 Amendment, dealing with the abolition of slavery, passed in the parliament. The movie deals with negotiation in depth it shows how Mr. Lincoln inspired, convinced or even bought off requisite number of members of the U.S. Congress to support Constitutional abolition of slavery. In the movie Lincoln, the situation in which President Abraham Lincoln takes his stand on the issue of abolition of slavery is very unique. Since no one was in favor of passing of such an amendment. The 13th commission was deeply criticized by one and all. The entire group of congressmen whether republicans or democrats were