Analysis: Cooking Up A Storm

1018 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Negative effects of genetically modified food

Cooking Up a Storm Food is the foundation of human life that allows us to thrive. It is a necessity for advancement and therefore people deserve to understand the products they are putting in their bodies, such as plants, animals, and others. In today’s American society something called GMO’s (Genetically Modified Organisms) exist. These modified organisms were once natural, but then crossed with different nutrients and pesticides in order to increase growth and sustainability and to decrease problems occurring within the organism. In return these organisms could unleash new plant and animal species that could damage both human health and the environment. Modifying the natural structure of the food we eat has created unpleasant controversy …show more content…

Today, only 13 slaughter houses are in control across the entire nation. These houses are filled with low costs to maximize profit to keep their economic monopolization running. These slaughter houses are run by four main companies, Monsanto, Tyson, Perdue, and Smithfield who also all happened to decline interviews for the film. “The dominant companies only ambitions are to protect each other” (Parr). After 25 years of practicing trade that goes back to the root of farming, Parr was sued by Monsanto for offering a service that might help a farmer save seeds. Nevertheless, this then lead to Monsanto running Parr straight out of luck, and straight out of business. Another farmer, Joel Salatin of Virginia’s Polyface farms, says “the nutritional value of American food products is increasingly in doubt” after witnessing these complications himself (Salatin). Monsanto and others are allowing lower paid workers without guaranteed hours, income, or benefits to replace full time employees, only to scam the American people and gain …show more content…

The top leading companies make it seem that money is the root of all evil. Corn is now mainly fed to cows, but also other animals because it is a cheap product that is virtually endless. The outcome of corn allows the animals to become fattened quickly which leads to being killed sooner. Not only is corn used with animals, but is involved in 90% of the foods we eat currently. Since the only motive for these companies is to make a quick buck, they will sell a product that is not fully acceptable to eat. Not to mention a cheeseburger from the well-known fast food establishment McDonalds now cost less money than a healthy head of broccoli. These burgers are cheap, which means easy access to almost anyone. The more you eat, the more it affects your body in a bad way. The constant consumption of these products increases the risk for diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, heart diseases, stroke, and even death. In front of everyone’s eyes they are taking your money only to give you an unhealthy heart attack waiting to

Show More
Related

  • Barbara Kingsolver Called Home

    1391 Words  | 3 Pages

    Moreover, this system of mass farming leads to single crop farms, which are ecologically unsafe, and the unnatural treatment of animals (Kingsolver 14). These facts are presented to force the reader to consider their own actions when purchasing their own food because of the huge economic impact that their purchases can have. Kingsolver demonstrates this impact by stating that “every U.S. citizen ate just one meal a week (any meal) composed of locally and organically raised meats and produce, we

    Read More

  • Essay On Corn Subsidies

    669 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...in the market. Diversified mid-sized family farms used to produce most of our meat, but now, only a few companies control the livestock industry. This has resulted in driving family farmers out of the market and replacing them with massive confined feeding operations that subject the animals to terrible living conditions that subject our food to contamination. Major food corporations are only concerned with minimizing overhead in order to deliver the consumer cheap food, regardless of the health implications.

    Read More

  • Difference Between Walmart And A Farmers Market

    1858 Words  | 4 Pages

    In doing so, the industry has effectively implanted an industrialized system which is, in part, a reason for its ability to offer ‘abundance, accessibility, and affordability’; the industry has been equally prosperous in cultivating and maintaining such a system. America’s agriculture has grown in scale, fully utilized biotechnology, and mechanized, which leads to questions for the consumer as well as demands for the industry leaders. This is due to the symbiotic relationship Walmart has with its consumers, they are able to offer lower prices in more locations and consumers desire affordability and proximity. Despite the obvious dominance of the economy by Walmart, less conventional producers and consumers are present and on the rise.

    Read More

  • Food Inc.: Movie Analysis

    510 Words  | 2 Pages

    The 2009 movie Food Inc. describes the major role that food production plays within many lives. This movie revealed that there is a very small variety of companies that consumers purchase their food from. These few companies actually control what is out on the shelves and what we put into our bodies. These companies have changed food production into a food production business. Many of these companies experiment with ways to create large quantities of food at low production costs to result in an enormous amount of profit for themselves. Some of the production cost cuts also result in less healthy food for the population. Instead of worrying about the health of the population, the companies are worried about what will make them the most money.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Food Inc

    1092 Words  | 3 Pages

    was the sheer power that big companies possess the food industry. The top 4 meat packing companies which are Tyson Foods, JBS USA, Cargill Meat solutions, and Smithfield Foods; control 90% of the meatpacking in the United States (Kenner). In addition to that, there were more than 1,000 slaughterhouses in the U.S in 1990, but in 2007 there was only 13 (Kenner). In the film Food Inc. a union organizer explained how Smithfield was taking advantage of low income workers, especially undocumented immigrants. Smithfield chooses low income, rural settings for its giant slaughterhouses, such as the hog slaughterhouse in Tar Heel, NC which is the world's largest slaughterhouse (Kenner). This way Smithfield can manipulate workers into doing about anything with the threat of losing their jobs, most often to keep quiet about what happens inside the slaughterhouse

    Read More

  • Factory Farmers: America's Very Own Bullies

    3876 Words  | 8 Pages

    “We take care of animals, and the animals take care of us.” (Rollin 212). The preceding phrase is a policy that American farmers in the old west lived their lives by. Modern farmers live do not live their lives anywhere near to this phrase because they own factory farms, and the whole reason for having a factory farm is to fit as many animals in a small space as possible in order to maximize profit. Factory Farms, or Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFO) first appeared in the 1920s, right after Vitamins A and D, because if animals are given these vitamins in their diets, exercise and sunlight are not necessities for the animals to grow anymore (In Defense of Animals 1). The growing number of factory farms is coupled with the decreasing population of rural areas, which means that many people are beginning to factory farm because it yields a higher profit (“Agricultural Sciences” 170). In the 1950s, the average number of chickens on a given egg farm in the United States was 100, but now the average number is a shocking 10,000 chickens (“Factory Farms” 4). The reason for the increase of chickens has to do with new and cheaper technology developed just after World War II. The new technology increased the number of chickens, while it had the opposite effect on dairy and meat cows, their numbers went in the other direction. The number of cows used for milk was cut by more than half between 1950 and 2000, because farmers discovered new and more efficient methods for milking cows (Weeks 4). Many activists for animals’ rights are concerned about the methods used by factory farmers because they confine their animals into tight spaces and since there are so many of them in a small ...

    Read More

  • Transgenic Food, Myths vs. Realities.

    782 Words  | 2 Pages

    Experts say, “Unless you consume only certified organic foods […] you’ve almost certainly eaten foods containing ingredients whose genes have been tweaked […].” (Anonymous, 2013, p.4). This assertion proves that people is eating food with Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO’s), nevertheless they disown the consequences of its intake. The opinions in the scientific society are divided, however recent experiments let predict the possible effects that GM Food production and consumption generates in a global scale. Genetically Modified Foods should be banned because it generates a negative impact on humans’ health, affects the environment and harms the third world nations.

    Read More

  • The Controversy Over Genetically Modified Foods ( GMOs)

    2216 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Controversy Over Genetically Modified Foods The genetic engineering of foods has, in one sense, been in existence for hundreds of years. The first time Gregor Mendel bred different varieties of pea plants to observe the various traits present in their offspring, the concept was born. Today, genetic engineering has developed into one of the most complex and advanced fields of scientific thinking, all the while provoking many questions and acquiring many opponents along the way. While there are compelling arguments presented for each side of the issue, the simple fact is that genetically modified (GM) foods are a reality, especially in the United States, as they are already present in many products that are consumed on a daily basis.

    Read More

  • Taking a Look at Genetically Modified Organisms

    1564 Words  | 4 Pages

    If you read the paper or watch the news, you’re undoubtedly aware of the debate raging over genetically modified food. Is it bad or is it good? Between the feuding sides, you might find yourself a little lost and wondering which side is right. Answers to seemingly simple questions have been blurred or exaggerated by both sides. On one side genetically modified food is more sustainable, safe, cheaper, easier to grow and has the potential of creating disease-fighting foods. Although this is positive and good intentioned, there may be unintended consequences that we have been quick to overlook. Those opposing genetically modified food clam that it is dangerous, harms the environment, increases health risks, and causes infertility and weight gain. Even things like the declining bee population may have closer ties to modified food than previously thought. We must look to science for answers. By studying genetically modified organisms (GMOs) we can guide our decision about whether we want to be consuming them.

    Read More

  • Genetically Modified Food (GMOs): Annotated Bibliography

    2902 Words  | 6 Pages

    Genetically modified food’s, or GMOs, goal is to feed the world's malnourished and undernourished population. Exploring the positive side to GMOs paints a wondrous picture for our planet’s future, although careful steps must be taken to ensure that destruction of our ecosystems do not occur. When GMOs were first introduced into the consumer market they claimed that they would help eliminate the world’s food crisis by providing plants that produced more and were resistant to elemental impacts like droughts and bacterial contaminants, however, production isn’t the only cause for the world’s food crisis. Which is a cause for concern because the population on the earth is growing and our land and ways of agriculture will not be enough to feed everyone sufficiently. No simple solutions can be found or applied when there are so many lives involved. Those who are hungry and those who are over fed, alike, have to consider the consequences of Genetically Modified Organisms. Food should not be treated like a commodity it is a human necessity on the most basic of levels. When egos, hidden agendas, and personal gains are folded into people's food sources no one wins. As in many things of life, there is no true right way or wrong way to handle either of the arguments and so many factors are involved that a ‘simple’ solution is simply not an option.

    Read More

  • The Extraordinary Science Of Addictive Junk Food Essay

    704 Words  | 2 Pages

    The sole purpose of a company is to offer goods and services while making a profit. If people have a liking for food products with so many unhealthy items and are willing to buy them, the companies have no obligation to reduce the amount of added ingredients. The companies aren’t the ones forcing the public to overeat. However, these companies shouldn’t market their products to people who they can easily exploit, like children and those who are penurious. Michael Moss, author of the article “The Extraordinary Science of Addictive Junk Food” interviews several people who worked for certain big brand companies and gives us an abundant amount of information on how the food companies make and market their food to “get us hooked”.

    Read More

  • What Are The Ethical Issues In Food Inc

    990 Words  | 2 Pages

    The way that our society has been able to produce food has changed in the last fifty years that the several thousand years beforehand. Robert Kenner addresses problems of our society’s food system and how there is only a handful of large corporations that have basically taken over the food system in the United States in the film Food, Inc. Large businesses have been able to significantly produce vast amounts of food and set low prices for consumers, usually because of government subsidies, which results in enormous profit and greater control of the food supply sources. This leads to negative health, safety, and economic consequences. This documentary examines the exercises of the few large food corporations from the start of production

    Read More

  • Reconsidering Our Plate: Reflection Of Food, Inc.

    338 Words  | 1 Pages

    Through powerful visuals, this movie highlights the practice of factory farming, genetic modification, and corporate control within the food industry. It showcases how these practices not only ruin the quality

    Read More

  • Pros and Cons of Genetically Modified Foods

    1288 Words  | 3 Pages

    The most wonderful activity a human being can experience is new flavors and foods. For example, the first time a person tastes a delicious juicy piece of prime rib or a delightful hamburger with cheese and ham, his world is never the same. However, since the beginning of the twentieth century, the production of food has been supplemented by science. This has triggered an angry dispute between the people who support the advances of biotechnology and people who love nature. In order to understand the controversy, we have to know the meaning of genetically modified foods. With new technological advances, scientists can modify seeds from a conventional seed to a high tech seed with shorter maturation times and resistance to dryness, cold and heat. This is possible with the implementation of new genes into the DNA of the conventional seed. Once these "transgenes" are transferred, they can create plants with better characteristics (Harris 164-165). The farmers love it not only because it guarantees a good production, but the cost is also reduced. On the other hand, organizations such as Greenpeace and Friends of Earth have campaigned against GMO (“Riesgos”) because they think that they are negatively affecting the earth (Gerdes 26). Both the advocates and the opponents of genetically modified foods have excellent arguments.

    Read More

  • Genetically Modified Food are Pandora´s Box to Humans and the Environment

    536 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Genetically modified foods are a "Pandora's box" of known and unknown risks to humans and the environment. They have been forced onto the American public by multinational biotech and agribusiness corporations without adequate oversight and regulation by the United States government (Driscoll, SallyMorley, David C).”Genetically Modified Food is food which has been chemically altered by scientists during the production process to give the food more nutrients, better appearance, and a longer shelf-life (Rich, Alex K.Warhol, Tom). The importance of this issue is that these GMO’s can actually have a negative effect in our society in general. It could mutate in a negative way and cause cancer or other diseases. Genetically modified food should be strictly controlled due to its various detrimental effects on the environment, human health, and potentially insect/animal effects.

    Read More

More about Analysis: Cooking Up A Storm

Open Document