An Apology For Poetry Analysis

1873 Words4 Pages

Sir Philip Sidney’s defence essay, “An apology for poetry,” refers to poetry “as an art of imitation […] [that] speaks metaphorically” (Ferguson, Salter & Stallworthy, 2005: 331). Sidney’s essay epitomises the pivitol importance and art of creating poetry. From the 1500’s to the 1660’s, England found itself a process of complete rebirth of all its important facets. Transformation in its social and cultural, as well as philosophical and religious approaches was evident. This transformational process, with regards to literature, resulted in the redesign of old, successful forms, such as the Petrarchan sonnet. Francesco Petrarch, the genius behind the 14th century Petrarchan sonnet, was legendary in creating a form in which to convey messages mostly thematic to the courtly love tradition. He was, however, completely unaware of the impact and influence the sonnet will have in the rebirth of culture and poetry in England, evolving from Sir Thomas Wyatt’s translations of Petrarch’s sonnets, to Sir Edmund Spenser’s rationalistic approach to the same form. Wyatt’s choice to use a form that already proved to be successful in conveying messages that matter, led him to translate Petrarch’s work, however, with a completely different contextual, individual message. Spenser, on the other hand, used the same frame of the Petrarchan sonnet but making quite significant changes to it, in as much as metamorphosing it into the Spenserian sonnet. Although both Wyatt and Spenser borrowed from the Petrarchan sonnet to appropriate it as a vehicle to convey their particular messages, this essay will aim to give clarity on how their strategies differed. It will make mention of how both Wyatt’s and Spenser’s approaches made use of restructuring and manip...

... middle of paper ...

...his creates a poetic idiom.
As students of literature, it goes without saying that one has to show a great amount of gratitude towards Petrarch for creating this form of poetry. It served as a vehicle to not only voice the frustrations of the birth of England’s new culture through Wyatt’s poetry, but also to convey the philosopical arguments about the sovereignty of art. Through Spencer and Wyatt’s adaptations and redesign of the Petrarchan sonnet, poetry can no longer be referred to as “the laughing stock of children” (Ferguson, et al., 2005: 327). These poets created “speaking picture[s]” (331) with their sonnets which are filled with metaphoric, philosophic and allegoric meaning, The revolutionary in the poetic artform ultimately created the platform to inspire Shakespeare to continue to leave a legacy and to give poetry permanence for generations to come.

Open Document