An Analysis of Feminist Articles

919 Words2 Pages

Kinoshita, Sharon. "Cherchez la Femme: Feminist Criticism and Marie de France's `Lai de Lanval'." Romance Notes 34.3 (1994): 263-73.

~Précis~

In the article, "Cherchez la Femme: Feminist Criticism and Marie de France's `Lai de Lanval'," Sharon Kinoshita examines Marie de France's "Lanval" and its feminist implications. She explores three critical essays that discuss the feminism revealed in the Lais of Marie de France and the differing views represented in each criticism. After discussing these interpretations Kinoshita retells "Lanval" and reveals her own opinion. Through her analysis of the three critical essays and her breakdown of "Lanval" Kinoshita argues Marie's feminism is not revealed through her portrayal of strong female characters, but instead through the titular male character's rejection of the code of chivalry.

Kinoshita begins the article by examining critical essays by William S. Woods, Charles Huchet and Michelle Freeman. Each critic has a different interpretation on what aspects of her writing make Marie de France a feminist writer. In his article, "Femininity in the Lais of Marie de France," Woods focuses on Marie's writing style and her "evident [femininity] in every aspect of the text," (qtd. in Kinoshita 263). Woods argues Marie de France's feminine voice is apparent in her writing style and is "emphasized by repetition, exaggeration, diminutives and excessively detailed descriptions," (Kinoshita 263). Kinoshita explains Woods' stereotypical views have a lot to do with the year in which the article was written, the 1950s.

Different from Woods' 1950s view of femininity, Charles Huchet's 1981 article compares Marie's lais to other works of the times. He suggests feminism is not present...

... middle of paper ...

...ent that characters receive praise for rejecting the patriarchal system, in turn revealing Marie's feminism. Although her argument holds true for "Lanval," it does not hold true for any of Marie de France's other lais.

Sharon Kinoshita describes four "widely divergent assessments of the female voice in the work of Marie de France," (265). While some critics believe Marie's feminism lies inherently in her writing style, others believe Marie made strategic moves to reveal her femininity. Each differing opinion holds true in some instances, but fall apart in others. Regardless of the differences of opinion regarding Marie de France's feminism, I can agree with most critics when they say Marie is one of the most celebrated female poets of her time. Marie de France will continue to be celebrated for years as a poet who wasn't afraid to show her female voice.

Open Document