An Analysis Of The Theme Of Alienation In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein Comparison Analysis

770 Words2 Pages

Carina Brannstrom, in the paper, An Analysis of the Theme of Alienation in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, published for a research article address the topic of alienation and declares that this is a major theme through Shelley’s novel. Brannstrom supports her claim by using emotional language, with personal anecdotes and reflections on the story, the use of repetition, explaining how multiple events shared the same experience of alienation in one way or another, and declarative sentences to show confidence in her assertions. The author's overall purpose to explain her views on the book’s overall theme and advises her readers to look deeper into the meaning of the novel. Brannstrom utilizes an frank tone to appeal to her audience’s sense of logic …show more content…

She first starts off with an example at the beginning of the story when Victor's mother dies. The author uses this time to explain how even when people try to do good things, it can lead to fatal instances. Brannstrom than talks about Victor’s change in character, as he becomes more of an evil soul, even though created and raised by decency and love. As the story progresses, the audience realizes that the passion, Victor had been harboring brought an evil out in him, and in some ways alienated himself with his studies. Not knowing what his scientific discovery and work would produce, Victor was adamant about creating this second “being”. However, after seeing it come to life, the scientist was disgusted and terrified of the creature he had made. Brannstrom exclaims that “Victor did not hate the monster he created out of spite, but out of fear”. In addition to this, the author also claims that because“the reputation around this type of appearance, which is associated with monster-like qualities, allows a society in this …show more content…

But after reading Brannstorm pieces, I was able to understand how this was a huge part in Shelley's novel. Although the monster killed and tormented many, this was set in place because of the way he was treated by others. The creator Victor Frankenstein began as a relatively innocent character, with a curiosity for scientific learning, but later we discover how his inner daemon develops. Not only can the daemon be seen within monster, but in this society and its inhabitants as well. The society shames him, even though he was really a gentle and loving creature. Unfortunately, because of this the monster was left in solitude and a broken heart, being not only abandoned by his creator, but by the rest of the world. The cruelty that was placed on the monster doesn’t make him the daemon, but rather the people surrounding him throughout the story. Conflicting views and intolerance within a society brought hatred upon an innocent being, who was looking for love. Shelley does an incredible job of sharing how abandonment, intolerance and inner daemons all come from evil within, and can create a negative ripple effect on those surrounding such situations. Finding identity is extremely hard, as seen in the eyes of a monster. Sometimes thoughts become a jumbled, mixed-up pot, that people are forced to pick out of because they are not secure or comfortable with who they are. They have to deal with the cards they

Open Document