Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Social effects of divorce on children
Social effects of divorce on children
Divorces impact on children research for literature review
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Social effects of divorce on children
A Permanent Matter
While A Temporary Matter can be viewed simply as faded love connections due to the loss of a child, Jhumpa Lahiri evaluates how problematic the distinctions between marital and maternal roles are through literary terms such as visual imagery, mood, tone and foreshadowing through exemplifying how the characters portray their grief. Inside the passage, paragraph eleven beginning at “These days Shoba was always gone by the time Shukumar woke up” and ending with “He thought of how long it had been since she looked into his eyes and smiled, or whispered his name on those rare occasions they still reached for each other 's bodies before sleeping”(2), Lahiri clarifies their marriage disputes are not just a temporary matter.
…show more content…
The title ‘A Temporary Matter’ is rather ironic in the sense that their issue is more a permanent matter. It is something that cannot be fixed or improved. The author, Lahiri emphasizes on her diction throughout the story. Shukumar remembers how Shoba would mark errors “in a code she had once explained to him” (2). Jhumpa Lahiri mentions Shoba using a code to hint at her secretive personality. Throughout the paragraphs, readers wonder if Shobas’ intentions were enigmatic because they were not shared. Lahiri continues to explain how Shukumar “envied her the specificity of her task” (2). The author uses the word ‘envied’ to exhibit how truly envious he was of how she was dealing with the loss of their baby. Almost somewhat jealous of how focused and precise she had become towards her work. Readers can gain Shukumar’s uncertainty towards Shoba’s new behavior. Referring to the author’s intent of sympathy towards Shukumar, she describes him as “a mediocre student”(2). The word ‘mediocre’ relates to average. With Shoba flourishing in her work life, Shukumar 's ordinary skills are not enough for him to make a living on his own. Lahiri continues to explain “he and Shoba had become experts at avoiding each other in their three-bedroom house”(2). The author applies the word ‘experts’ when describing their avoidance to boost the attention to that sentence. The couple not only avoids each other but they are becoming professionally well at this craft. This means they have been avoiding each other for an extended period of time. Jhumpa Lahiri magnifies the couple’s issues through diction in order to display how deep the marriage is
After months of brooding, Quoyle discovers that Wavey’s late husband, like Petal, was unfaithful and emotionally abusive. Quoyle then initiates an emotional conversation with Wavey and finally is able to accept that his relationship with Petal was unhealthy. Wavey, too, confesses her husband’s infidelity and the two connect more deeply (307-308). They are uniquely situated to understand one another’s burdens – grieving the loss of a lover while simultaneously feeling relieved by the loss of a tormentor. The two can be happy together and still acknowledge the grief that may never fully disappear. Their meeting was facilitated entirely by Quoyle’s journey. It is unlikely that he would have ever met a woman with whom he had enough in common to accept his loss had he remained in his old
Her family life is depicted with contradictions of order and chaos, love and animosity, conventionality and avant-garde. Although the underlying story of her father’s dark secret was troubling, it lends itself to a better understanding of the family dynamics and what was normal for her family. The author doesn’t seem to suggest that her father’s behavior was acceptable or even tolerable. However, the ending of this excerpt leaves the reader with an undeniable sense that the author felt a connection to her father even if it wasn’t one that was desirable. This is best understood with her reaction to his suicide when she states, “But his absence resonated retroactively, echoing back through all the time I knew him. Maybe it was the converse of the way amputees feel pain in a missing limb.” (pg. 399)
In “The Yellow Wall-paper by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, the unnamed female protagonist is going through a rough time in her life. (For now on, this paper will refer to this unnamed character as the “the narrator in ‘Wall-paper,’” short for “The Yellow Wall-paper. The narrator is confined to room to a room with strange wall-paper. This odd wall-paper seems to symbolize the complexity and confusion in her life. In “The Story of an Hour” by Kate Chopin, the protagonist, Mrs. Mallard must also deal with conflict as she must deal with the death of her spouse. At first there is grief, but then there is the recognition that she will be free. The institute of marriage ties the two heroines of these two short stories together. Like typical young women of the late 19th century, they were married, and during the course of their lives, they were expected to stay married. Unlike today where divorce is commonplace, marriage was a very holy bond and divorce was taboo. This tight bond of marriage caused tension in these two characters.
The couples share a certain amount of love for each other but the disconnection was stronger. The protagonist’s disconnection is evident because her husband treats her like a little girl instead of a wife when he takes her “ …in her arms and called [her] a blessed little goose” (p121). The Mallard’s disconnection is also evident because her husband’s “face that had never looked save with love upon her, fixed and gray and dead” (p 15). This is not the emotion a wife wants to feel from her husband.
...pared because of the infidelity and betrayal to their loved ones, and contrasted because of the different emotions that each of the main characters from feeling regretful and very indifferent.
Although their love has endured through many years, it has come to an end in the story. All throughout the story the couple is reminiscing about their life and while they are there are some odd details that are strewn throughout.
When he hears about the death of Maya, he prioritizes self-control above everything else. The only thing that occupies his mind is “control” (40) which leads him to believe that “control is everything” (173). When Nandana disappears, “again he ha[s] to control a desire to weep” (302). This is significant because it illustrates Sripathi's arrogance, as he believes that he can fully suppress his emotions without any consequences. Due to this, he focusses on self control to maintain his pride and honour which will be lost from shedding a tear. Without this arrogance, he will not be able to stay under the illusion that he is in “control”. However, it is revealed that his emotions are at their limit as “he [is] crying in front of every person who gives him a kind look” (302). After an entire night of searching for Nandana, Sripathi can no longer sustain that self-control. Sripathi allows himself to revisit an old memory of carrying his children home through a flood. On this journey, Maya wants to know whether or not Sripathi will always be there for her (306-307). This is important because Sripathi allows himself to reminisce about the past which breaks down his emotional barrier. This shows that coping with loss can lead to drastic change as Sripathi is able to overcome his arrogance through the realization that he cannot suppress his
In the short story, “The Story of an Hour,” author Kate Chopin presents the character of Mrs. Louis Mallard. She is an unhappy woman trapped in her discontented marriage. Unable to assert herself or extricate herself from the relationship, she endures it. The news of the presumed death of her husband comes as a great relief to her, and for a brief moment she experiences the joys of a liberated life from the repressed relationship with her husband. The relief, however, is short lived. The shock of seeing him alive is too much for her bear and she dies. The meaning of life and death take on opposite meaning for Mrs. Mallard in her marriage because she lacked the courage to stand up for herself.
The fact that the fictional mothers and daughters of the story have unhappy marriages creates a common ground on which they can relate. However, marriage has different meanings for each generation in this book. In the mothers’ perspective, marriage is permanent and not always based on love. Especially with their marriages in China, which was a social necessity that they must secretly endure in order to be happ...
Immediately, the narrator stereotypes the couple by saying “they looked unmistakably married” (1). The couple symbolizes a relationship. Because marriage is the deepest human relationship, Brush chose a married couple to underscore her message and strengthen the story. The husband’s words weaken their relationship. When the man rejects his wife’s gift with “punishing…quick, curt, and unkind” (19) words, he is being selfish. Selfishness is a matter of taking, just as love is a matter of giving. He has taken her emotional energy, and she is left “crying quietly and heartbrokenly” (21). Using unkind words, the husband drains his wife of emotional strength and damages their relationship.
Looking back on the death of Larissa’s son, Zebedee Breeze, Lorraine examines Larissa’s response to the passing of her child. Lorraine says, “I never saw her cry that day or any other. She never mentioned her sons.” (Senior 311). This statement from Lorraine shows how even though Larissa was devastated by the news of her son’s passing, she had to keep going. Women in Larissa’s position did not have the luxury of stopping everything to grieve. While someone in Lorraine’s position could take time to grieve and recover from the loss of a loved one, Larissa was expected to keep working despite the grief she felt. One of the saddest things about Zebedee’s passing, was that Larissa had to leave him and was not able to stay with her family because she had to take care of other families. Not only did Larissa have the strength to move on and keep working after her son’s passing, Larissa and other women like her also had no choice but to leave their families in order to find a way to support them. As a child, Lorraine did not understand the strength Larissa must have had to leave her family to take care of someone else’s
The actress states, “There’s got to be more to this marriage than a few hastily scribbled words on a small square of pastel paper! By the way. We’re out of post-its,” (Dooley and Holzman, 852). This results in the audience to question the actress’s goal of fixing the relationship with her husband, because the audience understands that she is unhappy with how they communicate, yet still asks for more of the basis of the communicative ways they do now, seeing no end to the repetitive cycle (Dooley and Holzman, 852). It is clear that the conversations between the two characters make the audience questionable of the character’s relationship in many ways.
...spair at the mortal separation between a parent and child, especially at the loss of the child. In this manner, Sumidagawa’s lack of literary tie-in serves its own purpose.
All readers will read and interpret this story in their own way based on their life and their knowledge of marriage. One thing that is indisputable is the emotions which carry through all people and the empowerment in which marriage has on these inspirations. In life love can renew one spirit as well as kill the passion of a person.
This story is a great representation of how relationships have changed over the years. Weather its the female dominance or the relationships are given up. Shoba and Shukumar are great examples of this phenomenon. This couple can be related to a typical American relationship. Jhumpa Lahiri does a good job of detailing this failure of a relationship and explains how this couple breaks apart.