Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The role of mass media in political campaigns
The role of mass media in political campaigns
The role of mass media in political campaigns
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The role of mass media in political campaigns
At its simplest, the idea of Americanisation draws attention to the existence of practices that were first developed in the US and that were then adopted into other politics systems and absorbed into political communication practices (Negrine, 2008:152). The term ‘American model’ means “...campaigning in democracies around the world is becoming more and more Americanised as candidates, political parties, and news media take cues from their counterparts in the United States” (Swanson and Mancini, 1996:4). However, there is debate about what ‘American model’ of electoral campaigns really means, as the spread of practices used by the United States, could be due to a number of reasons such as the increase in technology, globalisation, and modernisation. This does not mean that political campaigns are becoming ‘Americanised’ but that they are just doing the things that have proven to provide results for winning elections.
The influence of the internet on political campaigns has been an interesting topic of study since the rise of the internet in the mid 1990s, (Anstead an Chadwick, 2008). Farrell, Kolodny, and Medvic, state that “...the campaign process has passed through three main stages of development...” (Farrell, et all, 2001:12). First, it was campaigns driven by newspaper, then television, and now by the rise of the digital media and technologies political campaigns have taken a whole on a direction. The noticeable internet campaign was the Howard Dean 2004, which showed that there was a new and more efficient way to campaigning by using the technological resources available. From here, political campaigns have transformed considerably, Obama ‘08 for example. The main features of post modern campaigns fall under these three h...
... middle of paper ...
...ss of politics and journalism’ Working paper,
Norris, P., (2000), A Virtuous Circle: Political Communication in Postindustrial Societies. [Assessed on 2/3/14 - http://ksghome.harvard.edu/~pnorris/Books/Virtuous%20Circle.htm].
Norris, P., (2004), ‘The evolution of election campaigns: Eroding political engagement?’
Smith, C. F., and Webster, W. R., (2004), ‘Members of the Scottish Parliamnet on the Net’ Information Polity, 9:67-80.
Swanson, D. L., and Mancini, P., (1996), Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and Their Consequences (Google eBook) (Greenwood Publishing Group).
The Electoral Commission, (2010), ‘UK general election 2010: Campaign spending report’ http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/109388/2010-UKPGE-Campaign-expenditure-report.pdf [Assessed on 6/3/14].
In this article Mary Kate Cary opens up with the supreme court decision to not restrict the use of corporate funds in political advertising so that she can make her point that big money ads are not the most effective way for candidates to reach American constituents. She argues that social media is a new way for politicians to connect with citizens. Her five claim are that Americans can now, choose the media they wish to consume, share the media they choose the share, like posts they agree with and dislike posts they do not agree with, connect with others on social media, and donate to candidate campaigns online. With these claims she comes to the conclusion that politicians want to go around mainstream media so that they can connect directly with the voters.
Sayers, Anthony M., and Lisa Young. "Election Campaign and Party Financing in Canada." Australian Democratic Audit. Canberra: Australian National University (2004).
Garner, R., Ferdinand, P., & Lawson, S. (2009). Introduction to politics. Oxford, England: Oxford UP.
A candidate cannot legitimately compete in modern American elections without being able to finance a huge television advertising campaign. Commercials have become an integral part of our...
The aim of this paper is to look at the relationship between the mass media, specifically television, and presidential elections. This paper will focus on the function of television in presidential elections through three main areas: exit polls, presidential debates, and spots. The focus is on television for three reasons. First, television reaches more voters than any other medium. Second, television attracts the greatest part of presidential campaign budgets. Third, television provides the candidates a good opportunity to contact the people directly. A second main theme of this paper is the role of television in presidential elections in terms of representative democracy in the United States.
Brady, H. E., Johnston, R., & Sides, J. (2007, May 18). The Study of Political Campaigns. Retrieved November 16, 2011, from GWU: http://home.gwu.edu/~jsides/study.pdf
The researchers present findings that indicate that a politician’s popularity in the voting booth may be related to the frequency with which the candidate is talked about on social media. The researchers goes on to discuss how further research may conclude that social media has a bigger impact on voting outcomes than traditional forms of media, and how that could potentially shape the future of voting.
McGann, Anthony F. "POLITICAL ADVERTISING." Journal of Advertising Sept. 1984: 3. Communication & Mass Media Complete. Web. 2 Dec. 2013.
Stromback, J. (2008) Four Phases of Mediatization: An Analysis of the Mediatization of Politics, The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13: 228-246.
Castells, Manuel. "Communication, Power and Counter-power in the Network Society" International Journal of Communication 1 (2007), 238-266
7th edition. London: Pearson Longman, ed. Garner, R., Ferdinand, P. and Lawson, S. (2009) Introduction to Politics. 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
The main aim of this report is to analyze the impacts of changes in the media concerning the societal and individual view of politics and politicians. The report also describes significant milestones in mass media since the year 1960 and examines the impact of mass media on how people think politically. The report then considers the effect of technological advancements in mass media and the effect on the results of elections. The use of mass media has increased over the last fifty years in that it is a primary medium through which supporters of various campaigners share their ideas and views concerning politicians and different political parties. Through social media, behaviors and performance of several activists have brought
As the times change, so does the latest technology. In the mid-1900's it was the television, before that the radio, and now in the late-20th and 21st century we have the internet. With the coming of every new media outlet audiences and media moguls migrate. Along with the migrations are the politicians who try to use the new form of media to more easily reach the public. It's come to the point where the internet increasingly work with democracy directly; some elections in the United States even going so far as to hold online polling in a general election. "Online voting is increasingly making its way int our political process," writes Vote.com President Dick Morris, "the 2000 Arizona Democratic Primary tallied 39,942 online votes," (Morris 1034). However, should the internet really be used to such degrees in the case of democracy? There is an ongoing debate among scholars on the topic. One thing to consider is whether or not the many accusations stating that the internet is an aid to terrorism outweigh the positive effects of how the internet has strengthened democracy and has had a crucial part in turning oppressed nations into less oppressed, democratic states. On the subject of terrorism being aided by the internet, making it easier for terrorist factions leaders to inform their people, could it not be argued that these factions leaders could use other means of communication, maybe only a little less effectively and therefore nullifying the accusation that the internet is the culprit? After extensive research, it's clear that the internet does not harm democracy; on the contrary, the internet strengthens it in a way that no other form of media has done before.
Social media including Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Youtube, Flicker, internet websites, and blogs are becoming mainstream attracting a younger more technology savvy voter. Many candidates in the last elections learned to use these mediums so not to overlook tech savvy voters and learned how to use these to their advantage. Candidates took to the internet to raise awareness, state views, and even successfully raised donations. Social media was able to provide instant feedback on the standing of a candidate often days or weeks sooner than a more traditional poll.
As Americans we take pride in our liberating government. But, it is essential to ask how much we, the general public, know about our democracy. Because of the representative structure of our government, it is in our best interest to remain as knowledgeable as possible about political affairs so that we can play an active role in our democracy by voting for candidates and issues. The media, which includes print, television, and the internet, is our primary link to political events and issues. (For the purposes of this essay only print and television will be considered.) Therefore, in order to assess the success of our democracy it is necessary to assess the soundness of our media. We are lucky enough to have a media, in theory, free from government influences because of our rights to freedom of press and freedom of speech, but we are still subject to the media’s interpretation and presentation of politics, as is the danger when depending on any source for information. So, we must address how the media informs us; how successful it is at doing so; and how we should respond to it.