Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Racial discrimination in the US justice system
Race and ethnicity in the united states history
Racial discrimination in the US justice system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Racial discrimination in the US justice system
American Violet is an American film that depicts the institutionalized racism African Americans face at the hands of the judicial system. Based on a true story, this movie was set during the election of 2000 and after the election. A young single mother of four, Dee Roberts, is wrongful accused of selling drugs in Melody, Texas. The powerful district attorney in Melody authorizes a police raid of Dee’s project apartments due to a single informant information. While drugs were never found in her apartment, she is taken into custody and charged with the crime of selling during in a school zone. Dee Roberts has no prior convictions and/or arrests. Also drugs were not found on her when she was arrested. Once Dee Roberts is able see an attorney, …show more content…
she was offered a plea deal and harshly warned that if she declines the plea deal, she will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law.
Dee refuses to take the plea deal. She is later approached by an American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) attorney and former police officer who would like to challenge the district attorney and change the criminal justice system. After much hesitation, Dee agrees to sue the district attorney and try and clear her name. There were many obstacles Dee faced in the process of her suing the district attorney. For example, she had a custody hearing between her and the father of her children which was overseen by the very same district attorney she is suing. Much investigation goes into making the case against the district attorney. The single informant that was used to begin the raid at Dee’s project apartments, was given a chance to testify. It was later discovered that the informant was coerced into saying that he bought drugs from Dee Roberts so the charges he was facing would …show more content…
be dropped. It was also discovered that he had several mental illnesses, which the local police were aware about but still used him as an informant. At the end, Dee was clear of her charges and her case had a significant effect on the Texas criminal justice system. This film is very relevant to issues African Americans face on a day to day basis. After viewing this film, the important question now becomes “what social issues were seen in the film?” There were several social issues that were depicted in this film. This essay will focus on the social issue of the unfair imprisonment of African Americans in the United States due to institutionalized racism. This essay will also focus on the war on drugs. Race disparity in the criminal justice system is not a new concept, it has been discussed for years. It is no secret that African Americans have been receiving harsher punishments than their white counterparts for committing the same crime and/or overall. Why is that? This can be dated all the way back to slavery. Ever since African slaves arrived in the United States, they were closely watch and policed by their slave owners and law enforcement. “Slaves moving beyond the boundaries of plantations were required to have passage papers authorized them to do so.” (Bass 2001) If any slaves were caught without papers, they would be physically punished. Once slavery was abolished, African Americas started to mix with the rest of the population. African Americans faced racism from Caucasians and the system started to create ways to keep African Americans oppressed, this is what is known as institutionalized racism. These Jim Crow laws were implemented by the government. These laws included strict loan qualifications for African Americans, strict voting qualifications, segregated schools, etc. These were all used as ways to keep African Americans from advancing. For example, up until 1965, African Americans were not able to vote in the United States. In order to keep African Americans from voting, officials made literacy tests and promised violence to those who tried to vote. (Bass 2001) This assured African Americans would not vote, which allowed Caucasians to continue to push their own agendas and make sure they are the only ones who would benefit from it. When it came to housing, African Americans were pushed to live in terrible conditions. “The rise of Jim crow and location and construction of urban ghettos and public to promote social control and isolation through racial containment.” (Bass 2001) These effects are still present in the United States and were depicted in American Violet. In the movie, Dee Roberts and her family lives in the projects with her family. This was a predominantly African American project, not one Caucasian was shown living at those project apartments. It was located in a terrible area and had drugs circulating around. “It is well established that during the colonial period, slavery, and the Jim Crow eras that the law systematically and deliberately denied such equality of treatment to African Americans.” (Bobo & Thompson 2006) The war on drugs was a major theme that was centered around American Violet.
The phrase, “war on drugs” was first used by Former President Nixon. The polices created tried to control the supply and demand of drugs but “the war on drugs” turned into a war on minority communities, especially African Americas. At this time, cocaine was introduced to the scene, but was mainly used by Caucasians. The police did not pay much mind to it until this very same drug started to show up in African American communities. (Welch 2007) “Urban black Americans have borne the brunt of the War on Drugs. They have been arrested, prosecuted, convicted, and imprisoned at increasing rates since the early 1980s, and grossly out of proportion to their numbers in the general population or among drug users. (Welch 2007) The war on drugs helped create the stereotype that African Americans are the top users and distributors of drugs which is untrue. This made police single out minorities, especially African Americans when it came searches, arrests, and convictions. As stated earlier, police raid Dee’s project and arrested her and several other people. This was a pre-determined raid that in the eyes of many, was unlawful and unjust. Many people that were locked up with Dee and/or prior to Dee arriving at the prison, were there on drug charges. This is not the first time when drug raids have plagued the African American community. Police target these populations quite often. African Americans
make up roughly 13% of the United States population and represent about half of the people that are incarcerated. (Coker 2003) According to the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), “5 times as many Whites are using drugs as African Americans, yet African Americans are sent to prison for drug offenses at 10 times the rate of Whites.” (NAACP N/A) African Americans account for nearly 75% of the drug related charges on a national level. (Welch 2007) The privatization of prisons has also contributed to increasing numbers of African Americans incarceration. The more people that are in prisons, the more money the state gets. This alone is motivator to arrest and charge as many people as possible. With African Americans already being sent to prison at higher rates then Caucasians, this only fuels these type of statistics even more. Depicted in the film, Dee Roberts is offered a plea deal that would get her home to her children faster, but she would have admit to the crime of selling drugs in a school zone, which she did not commit. Her lawyer encouraged her to take the plea deal or she will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, which in her case would be 16-25 years. If she decided to take the plea deal, she would lose any type of government assistants such as food stamps or government housing, in the future. One of the people from Dee’s project ended up taking a similar plea deal out of fear. These are the type of tactics law enforcement uses to get a quick conviction. Law enforcement also tries to use past arrest and/or convictions as a means of justifying the sentencing of African Americans. In American Violet, a there was an example of this. Dee was questioned at the hearing against the district attorney. Her previous arrests were brought up. Before her initial drug arrest, Dee had one arrest for theft when she was in her teens. A prosecutor asked her about it and Dee admits to committing that crime. When she was trying to explain herself, the prosecutor cut her off and told her she was guilty. The prosecutor then brought up a recent arrest after she was released on bail. She had an incident with the father of her children. The prosecutor tried to use this to show the other officials in the room that because she was arrested for those crimes, even if the charges were dropped, that mean she is guilty of the drug charges brought against her. In all, American Violet did a good job depicting the injustices African Americans face in the hands of the criminal justice system. While Jim Crow laws do not exist anymore, institutionalized racism is still very prominent in the United States. It will continue to be a problem if it is not recognized as a problem by the majority race in this country, Caucasians. Having more conversations about institutionalized racism can bring more awareness to others about the effects it has on minorities. The war on drugs is also still happening in the United States. African Americans are still receiving harsher convictions than others and are being pressured to take plea deals which are harmful to their future. Like institutionalize racism, the war on drugs and the effect it has on minorities needs to be discussed. While this country has progressed a significant amount, it still has a long way to go to make sure all people despite race, sex, religion, sex orientation, etc. are treated fairly in the criminal justice system.
Dan saw that they did not need prosecution intervention but they did need HELP! He referred several agencies including bereavement counselling to the family who over a period of a couple of hours spoke, cried and thanked Dan again for being there. On leaving the residence which Dan describes to me as a nice family home with good people impacted by tragic events, Mrs. Brar said to Dan, I believe you were chosen to be here today, as you were the night my son died. Thank you for your compassion, discretion and leniency with my husband despite his actions. I believe Dan again been in the right place at the right time was able to Police with his emotional intelligence and impact another families life wearing the Calgary Police
The case State v. Snowden is an appeal by the defendant were the defendant pleaded guilty to an evidence charging Raymond Alien Snowden with the crime of murder of first degree. The trial of the defendant was represented by the district Court, 3rd Judicial District, Ada County, were Snowden entered judgment and sentenced of death but he appealed. Snowed was at a bar in the evening drinking and playing pool in a Boise pool room, he and other person visited another club near the one where they were playing pool, nearby Garden city. That same day Snowden and his friend visited several bars also drinking, at the end they stop at HiHo club. That same bar he met and starts having a conversation to this lady Cora Lucyle Dean, they start dancing and having a time together and they left together, while they were walking they start arguing in the street, because she wanted him to find her a cab and take her to back to Boise, but he said that he shouldn’t be paying her fare.
As Judge Dee begins solving the crimes, the story unfolds slowly and shows the reader the history of China. In the Celebrated Cases of Judge Dee, Judge Dee lived in the Tang dynasty. During this period, one can see how the Chinese authoritative views were strict, the laws and punishment which were enforced, and what the outlook on the Chinese society was. Authority had a strong hold on their community and the people in the town also confined in them to help them and solve crimes. The community also knew what the consequences of causing a crime was and that indeed it was wrong to omit a crime. Judge Dee and with the help of his associates, begins solving the crime through much observation and Judge Dee was very clever. He used methods and tools such as, going undercover, using underground sources, interrogation, and forensic science to solve his problems. It isn’t much different today on how we solve crime in the western world.
Dee Goong An, more popularly known as Judge Dee, was a well known magistrate of the Tang Dynasty (618-907 AD). His popularity comes from his just perspective, which makes him a great magistrate. He addresses new cases with open ears and is determined to be fair at all times. He treats all people equally and relies only on hard proof to solve cases. With some help, he uncovers guilty criminals, using several techniques to find the truth. Going undercover and using torture to get people to confess, Judge Dee uses his persist approaches to make things right. He risks his job for the truth, and relies on his gut and experience to capture felons. Judge Dee's experience and righteous judgment to find the true criminals by proving them guilty, makes him an ideal magistrate of the time.
She is fairly new to the work world and has lied on her resume’ to get hired, and realizes that the job is harder than she first thought. All hope is not lost because Violet assures her that she can be trained. She ends up succeeding at the company and telling her husband she will not take him back after he comes back begging for her love again.
A predominantly black town in Florida by the name of Rosewood was abandoned in 1923 due to the city being left in devastating ruins after a horrendous bloodshed massacre. The massacre was initiated by accusations of a black man by the name of Jesse Hunter assaulting a white female by the name of Fanny Taylor. But their troubles didn’t begin there this was long awaiting battle due to prior false information that often ended with a black person being lynched.The incident regarding Jesse Hunter and Fanny Taylor set havoc to the little town of Rosewood.In spite of the rumors that the two were romantically involved or that at least the woman was using the incident to cover up her premarital affairs. Meanwhile, members of the Ku Klux Klan rallied in nearby towns and gathered people to go and rise terror on Rosewood. The one person who knew the truth was a man named Sam Cartier. Who was lynched by the Ku Klux Klan as a warning to whoever was helping Jesse. It was soon rumored that Jesse’s friend Aaron’s cousin Sylvester was hiding him at his house. The KKK demanded
From the beginning, I believed that Mr. Dees was the one guilty of kidnapping Katie Mackey. It seemed as if there was no way to argue it. Every section, whether it be the third person narrative, other characters narratives, or Mr. Dees’ first person section, he always sounded guilty. Everything he did just sounded so creepy and so suspicious. But then, after I read more and more, even though he still seemed very creepy and guilty, I felt that he couldn’t have been the one to do the kidnapping; it just seemed too obvious.
Violet has a deeper understanding of the society she lives in, and she also begins to question the corporations who run that society. When Violet was at the doctor’s she started to “think about things” (Anderson 80). In this particular scene, Violet sounds paranoid as she explains her thoughts, “Everything we do gets thrown into a big calculation. Like they’re watching us right now. They can tell you where you are looking.
The drug war is the New Jim Crow because it empowers the state with the tools to target, and denies African Americans civil rights, citizenship, and justice in the pretext of elaborate criminal changes that serve as a mean to furthermore disenfranchise African Americans.
The War on Drugs is believed to help with many problems in today’s society such as realizing the rise of crime rates and the uprooting of violent offenders and drug kingpin. Michelle Alexander explains that the War on Drugs is a new way to control society much like how Jim Crow did after the Civil War. There are many misconceptions about the War on Drugs; commonly people believe that it’s helping society with getting rid of those who are dangerous to the general public. The War on Drugs is similar to Jim Crow by hiding the real intention behind Mass Incarceration of people of color. The War on Drugs is used to take away rights of those who get incarcerated. When they plead guilty, they will lose their right to vote and have to check application
While the War on Drugs may have been portrayed as a colorblind movement, Nixon’s presidency and reasoning for its implementation solidifies that it was not. Nixon coined the term “War on Drugs” in his 1971 anti-drug campaign speech, starting the beginning of an era. He voiced, “If there is one area where the word ‘war’ is appropriate, it is in the fights against crime” (DuVernay, 13th). This terminology solidified to the public that drug abusers were an enemy, and if the greatest publicized abusers were black, then black people were then enemy. This “war” started by Nixon claimed it would rid the nation of dealers, but in fact, 4/5 of arrests were for possession only (Alexander, 60). Nixon employed many tactics in order to advance the progress
The targets of the drug war are certain racial groups just because they are of color, they are targets because the law enforcements have bias opinions about the people of color rather than those who are white.The people of color and whites are both as likely to use and sell drugs, but the people of color have a bigger probability to get arrested, searched, prosecuted, convicted or sent to jail for the violation of drug laws. The drug war isn't only about people of color, it is about every races including white. The enforcement does not look for the increasing of drug activity because But the law enforcement doesn’t focus on the high income neighborhoods in search for drugs, what they do is focus on the poor low income neighborhoods because that is where they think drugs are being abused. The drug policies are very discriminatory and attack those that are non white, or those who live in a neighborhood where everyone thinks drugs are abused there. According to the article “Race, Drugs, and Law Enforcement in the United States” it uses statistics from seattle that shows a clear example of the discrimination of the supposed war on drugs.“A recent study in Seattle is illustrative. Although the majority of those who shared, sold, or transferred serious drugs[17]in Seattle are white (indeed seventy percent of the general Seattle population is white), almost two-thirds (64.2%) of drug arrestees are black”(hrw.org 1). This quote shows what a study found in seattle, that the population in seattle is seventy percent but most of the people in jail are blacks. Seattle has a problem where cocaine and crack are the main drug being abused and sold, but the people who sell it the most is whites but the majority who end up in jail for cocaine or crack charges are african americans. Well this happens because black people do drugs but also white people, but the ones who are the victims of incarceration are
When it comes to the topic of war on drugs,most of us will readily agree that the war on drugs is not about the drugs But about the people. Many Politicians and law enforcement will argue that the war on drugs is about our nation's wealth and safety.however they don't see the destruction the war on drugs has caused; The war on drugs has recreated this new system of discrimination among the minority community, individuals and communities are being profiled,their rights as citizen are being seized ,individuals being stripped away from their families. They’re being locked up with no hope to live the American dream in their our country.
In reality, the war had little to do with drug crime and a lot to do with racial politics. The drug war was part of a strategy used by the government. The President identified drug abuse as a national threat. Therefore, they called for a national anti-drug policy, the policy began pushing for the involvement of the police force and military in drug prohibition efforts. The government did believe that blacks or minorities were a cause of the drug problem.
The war on drugs began with the presidential term of President Nixon in the 1970s. According to drugpolicy.org, “He dramatically increased the size and presence of federal drug control agencies, and pushed through measures such as mandatory sentencing and no-knock warrants. Nixon temporarily placed marijuana in Schedule One, the most restrictive category of drugs.”