American Revolution Vs French Revolution Research Paper

1044 Words3 Pages

The American and the French revolutions consist of many differences and likenesses. One of which being that they both desired to escape the ruling of their anarchy. Second, both the Americans and the French began by the rebellion of people against unfair taxation by there monarchy.
Now, even though they started out similarly, they also did have some differences from each other. The American Revolution was the first big revolution of the century, and it was also the first to be successful.One of the biggest reason why it was successful was that it wasn't conceited rebellious , but rather conservative. The French were on the offensive, battling for freedom that began with the Storming of the Bastille.
Finally, the biggest contrast between …show more content…

“The French Royal Government could not command sufficient taxes to be able to finance itself.” (pg.594) It all started when the French Monarchy emerged from The Seven Year war defeated, and deeply in debt. Ironically a lot of the debt came from the French support of the American Revolution. Paradoxically, France was a rich nation with an impoverished government (pg.594.)” France restricted free trade with other nations and kept the country and most of its people in a state of poverty. These people were still organized into three different feudal class divisions of estates. (French Revolution) The First Estate was, the Clergy, it consisted of those employed by the Catholic Church. They had great influence in France, controlling vast amounts of land and they were exempt from taxes. The Second Estate, the Nobility, were also exempt from most of the king taxes. They had the best and highest paid jobs in the army, church, and legal professions. The Third Estate, encompassing all the other people not in the other classes, which composed of about 98% of the population and had the greatest economic and social diversity. They were starved and ragged. They bore the brunt of the ever-increasing taxes. They were required to pay fees for land ownership every year. Because the other two estates did not have to pay taxes, this made it more of a burden for the peasants. Now the king is …show more content…

The people from the First and Second Estates wanted different things. Although they did agree on a constitution that stated some control over what the king could do. There was a debate of how to count the estates votes, because the Third Estate controlled 98% of the vote. So if they counted individually the other two estates would be out numbered. Or if you voted as an entire unit this would be unfair as well because again there were 98% of the people in the one unit. So there was turmoil over to vote traditionally, or by giving each one vote. King Louis wanted each state to vote as a

Open Document