Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
American revolution social political
American revolution social political
American revolution social political
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
On April 19, 1775, the British marched into Lexington, ordering the Patriots to disperse as an undetermined gun fired “the shot heard around the world”. Only one British soldier was wounded, but the American Revolution had begun. On August 23, 1775, King George declared the American colonies in “open and avowed rebellion” and that “they must submit or triumph.” He viewed the rebellion as traitorous and urged Parliament to move quickly to end the revolt. He signed The Proclamation of Rebellion, giving Parliament the authority to dispatch troops against his own subjects, something the colonists believed impossible. Four months later Parliament declared the colonies beyond protection. Still, the King urged the colonists to understand “that …show more content…
to be a subject of Great Britain, with all its consequences, is to be the freest member of any civil society in the known world.” Instead, the colonies declared their independence on July 4, 1776 – 442 days after the first shot was fired. Subsequently, it was another Englishman, Thomas Paine, who stoked the rebellious flames of the colonists stating a government must serve its people and when it fails in that aspect, a revolt was not only acceptable but required.
It is historically important to note that the Americans sought to reconcile their differences with the King, asking him to intervene with Parliament immediately after taxation was enacted. He ignored their pleas, labeling them as rebellious traitors. Victorian author, George Trevelyan, argued the King intended to keep his country at war and refused to heed counsel from his advisors. He farther contended George wanted to keep the rebel’s poor, anxious and harassed until the day came when their disappointment and discontent were transformed into remorse and penitence. Trevelyan supported this argument with a statement from prominent Whig John Dunning, “The influence of the Crown has increased, is increasing, and ought to be diminished.” He introduced a motion in the House of Commons that the King had abused his powers, which passed by a slim margin. Parliament - the sovereign political body - concluded that the King had overstepped his …show more content…
bounds. However, several historians assert the American Revolution was caused by the discord of Parliament led by Prime Minister Lord North. They insist that the Tory policies and control of parliament from 1770 to 1782, enraged the Whigs and British Americans. Although many Americans, such as Thomas Jefferson, placed the blame squarely on George’s shoulders, it is more plausible that the British Monarch had no real constitutional authority in more than a century. A harsh critic of George, Horace Walpole clarified the King “seemed to resign himself entirely to the conduct of The House of Commons” before 1774. This contention showed the King understood the true sovereignty of Britain was with the Parliament. King George’s reign was filled with wars and numerous changes to the monarchy.
He ruled during the American Revolution, oversaw the defeat of Napoleon, observed the founding of the “second British Empire”, and witnessed the decline of monarchical power. His private writings reveal he closely tracked the war’s path in maps and regiment lists even though he lacked the education to understand the true impact of these events. Rick Atkinson, a two-time Pulitzer prize winner, extensively studied the writings of George III. He described the King as “someone who is puzzling through an extraordinarily complex problem for which he does not really have a vocabulary.” David Starkey’s documentary Monarchy shows George drafted his own letter of abdication after the loss in Yorktown in 1781 and agonized over the decision at length. Although he did not resign as king, George viewed this as a personal failure on his leadership abilities which weakened his position with
Parliament. In the fall of 1783, a British father of 15 sat down to think about the world “turned upside down”. The Revolutionary War ended in defeat for this father who was the King of Britain, a man who rarely set foot outside London and had never visited the American continent that had caused him so much distress. The private papers of George portray a man who was humble, caring and empathetic yet as King he was deemed “unfit to be the ruler of a free people” and a “Prince whose character deemed him a tyrant” by the colonists turned citizens. King George III never fully recovered from the loss of the colonies as he soon began to suffer bouts of madness which left him unable to rule and in isolation. The loss of the American colonies seemed, at the time, a great calamity to both the British and victorious colonists. Nonetheless, the American Revolution was not solely a revolt against taxation; it was also an uprising to resist privilege, oppression and aristocratic rule. The United Kingdom became greater and more powerful after the separation than it had ever been before and the Monarchy remained a symbol for the people with little power but major influence. It was Winston Churchill who acknowledged that “The loss of the colonies seemed a great calamity; yet in America, there developed a great nation of kindred speech and institutions.” Lessons learned included how to rule colonies without oppression and to view them as sources of strength. Historically, George III remains “the King who lost America” although a broader lesson of the American Revolution is that government must obey the will of its people. In the end, there is ample evidence to support George III was the King who took the first step towards political liberty and freedom for both Great Britain and America. It is given more significance as the lesson is taught by a man who once declared he was born for the happiness or misery of his country.
The colonists were in every right, aspect and mind, not only justified but also it was about time that they stood of and actually take action against the British. The choice of going to war with them, was the only choice that they had. All diplimatical options that they had ceased to stand a chance against the tyrant Britain. From the very beginning when the colonists felt upset against their mother country and the way that they went about the law making, up until the beginning of the war, they tried all diplimatical options that they had, by sending letters, you name it. When they didn’t work then they had no other means but to declare war.
The Americans had won their independence, much to the dismay of the British crown. King George III lost his American colonies for a number of reasons. The responsibility of the American Revolution and King George III’s loss of his colonies cannot be placed on one specific event, but rather a build-up of tensions over the years causing the idea of freedom to ring through the colonies and drive them to make the United States of America a free country ‘with liberty and justice for all.’ Works Cited “Boston Tea Party.” Columbia University Press.
During the War for American Independence, 78 men were commissioned as general officers into the Continental Army by the Continental Congress. Many of these generals commanded troops with differing levels of competence and success. George Washington is typically seen as most important general, however throughout the war a number of his subordinates were able to distinguish themselves amongst their peers. One such general was Nathanael Greene. At the end of the Revolutionary War, Greene would become Washington’s most important subordinate, as demonstrated by Edward Lengel’s assessment of Greene as “the youngest and most capable of Washington’s generals.” Washington and Greene developed a strong, positive and close relationship between themselves. Greene began his life in the military after having been raised a Quaker. With limited access to literature and knowledge in his younger years, Greene became an avid reader which equipped him with the knowledge necessary to excel as a general during the war. Through his devoted study of military operations, firsthand experience and natural abilities as a soldier, Greene became an excellent military commander. He would become known for his successful southern campaign, during which, he loosened British control of the South and helped lead the war to its climax at Yorktown. Throughout the war, he was involved in a number high profile battles where he built a reputation of being an elite strategist who also understood unconventional warfare, logistics, and the importance of military-civil affairs and had a natural political/social acumen. The thesis of this paper is that Greene’s proven reputation of being a soldier, strategist and statesman would cause him to become the second greates...
Subsequently, it was appointed to King George III; withal, it was rejected. Obstinacy and greed characterized him, and torment was his specialty. He planned on keeping the “New World” for himself without even considering the outlook from his fellow men. He was not interested in making any type of variation, seeking only for domination. Written in the Olive Branch Petition, there is a line that reads “...your royal authority and influence may be graciously interposed to procure us relief from our afflicting fears and jealousies…” (Dickinson, John). That displays the everlasting fear that lived within the people of the thirteen colonies. The repercussions of the king’s disgraceful actions were The Declaration of Independence and the Revolutionary War. John Dickinson and the Continental Congress enunciate that they want to settle peace through every part of their dominions. However, the jilt of the petition divulged war as the only option, unless they wanted their doctrines of morality crushed. The colonists praised King George to such degree that misery came from his adoration; their need to make peace made them write a petition that tributes a man they deemed
In the world’s lens during the 1760s, the British empire had a clear and prominent control over the colonies. However, by the mid-1770s the Americans became enraged enough to declare war against the British for independence. Due to Britain’s massive imperial presence around the globe, the British civilians had a strong inclination for a successful outcome. Instead, the colonists pulled a surprising victory from what should have been a swift defeat. While the British had an abundance of advantages, they lost the Revolutionary War because the British army underestimated the colonists’ perseverance for freedom.
In 1775, the American colonists were faced with a question that would lead to everlasting consequences on their newly developing nation. Due to the several unjust taxes Great Britain had forced them to pay, colonial America was torn into two. Those who sided with Great Britain became known as loyalists; however, those believed the colonies should declare independence became known as the patriots. Patrick Henry, a passionate American patriot, advocates to declare war upon the tyrannical nation of Great Britain in the speech “Speech in the Virginia Convention” that he delivers to the delegates at the Virginia Convention. Patrick Henry’s purpose in writing this speech is to inform the delegates that war with Great Britain is necessary and to encourage
“Give me liberty or give me death!” This statement from Patrick Henry’s “Speech to the Virginia Convention,” delivered to the House of Burgesses, has been quoted by many, becoming almost cliché. However, the declaration is truly understood by a select few. The unjust Stamp Act passed by the British crown in 1765, brought fame and notoriety to Henry as he spoke out against the unjust taxation without representation. Ten years later on the eve of revolution, Henry calls upon the Colonial government of which he is part, to act for the betterment of the people. Patrick Henry attempts to persuade the House of Burgesses to revolt and declare war against Britain by logically convincing them that it is their natural right to be free and calling on their patriotism and pride as leaders of colonial America.
Politically, the French and Indian War torn apart Britain and its American colonies. In Document C, George Washington is asking Robert Orme to let him become a higher rank in the military. He wanted more power. Washington wishes to serve under, "a Gentleman of General Braddock's abilities and experience." Although he was very sincere when he wrote this, Britain was not giving what he truly wanted. Upon this note, George Washington went against the British government. He started a revolution. Reverend Thomas Barnard also had some similar views and thoughts about Britain and its colonies. In his sermon of 1763, he says, "Safe from the Enemy of the Wilderness, safe from the gripping Hand of arbitrary Sway and cruel Superstition, here shall be the late founded Seat of Peace and Freedom." He believes that the American people have suffered and died on this land and they deserve more. They deserve freedom. Britain was losing control of their colonies. The people of the colonies wanted freedom. All of these political events led to the Revolutionary War.
King George III (1738-1820) is famous for his involvement in the American Revolution and his rule over Great Britain in the late 18th and early 19th century. He was the king of Great Britain and the American colonies, but his laws and taxes angered the colonists and he eventually lost his power over them and they became the United States of America, the country we live in today. While intense battles needed soldiers and brave men to fight them, King George was a family man. He had to have been involved with coming up with new laws and taxes, and also battles that paved the way for the founding of America, but he was also involved with his family. He had a wife and sixteen children, ten sons and six daughters and was known for caring for them.
In the episode, after the declaration is sent to England, the Kings response is read aloud to the congressional committee. What I thought was the most interesting thing about this scene was is that there was only one line that was read from the response, “…or other proper officer, due and full information of all persons who shall be found carrying on correspondence with, or in any manner or degree aiding or abetting the persons now in open arms and rebellion against our Government, within any of our Colonies and Plantations in North America, in order to bring to condign punishment the authors, perpetrators, and abetters of such traitorous designs” (2). The choice of this passage is clearly portraying King George as an unmerciful tyrant. After reading the document in its entirety, the British viewpoint is quite different from what I grew up believing about the revolution. The document has a feeling of disappointment to it. The American colonies were a misbehaving kid and England was the disrespected parent, who protected the colonies from the French and Indians, and was enforcing a tax (half that of what British citizens were paying) to pay for that war. The saying is, history is written by
“Don’t fire unless fired on. But if they mean to have war, let it begin here”(John Parker). My fellow colonists, we are here to talk about about the problem facing our colonies. The dilemma we are here to discuss is the Patriots trying to leave Britain’s rule. British government has done nothing wrong. The Patriots are completely overreacting, and The Sons of Liberty have taken this to an extreme. It is not a tremendous deal that Britain has taxed us, we should help our mother country climb out of its debt. In all of the battles our king has participated in, they have been trying to protect us, and it would not be smart to flee from their protection. My fellow colonists, if we go to war with our motherland, we shall lose the ability to protect ourselves from other lands and rivaling armies, our economy shall fail, and the cost the war shall be devastating.
When declaring independence, the bulk of the people thought that would be “…to burn the last bridge, to become traders in the eyes of the mother country.” (Garraty 110). John Dickinson had stated, “ ‘Torn from the body to which we are united by religion, liberty, laws, affections, relation, language and commerce, we must bleed at every vein.’ “ (Garraty 110). The people were afraid to break away, they pondered “ ‘Where shall we find another Britain.’ “ (Garraty 110). Eventually independence was inevitable. There was a great mistrust towards both Parliament and George III when the colonists heard that the British were sending hired Hessian soldiers to fight against them in the revolution. The pamphlet written by Thomas Paine entitled Common Sense called boldly for complete independence. This reflected his opinions on George III, calling him a brute, and also attacking the idea of monarchy itself. “Virtually everyone in the colonies must have read Common Sense or heard it explained and discussed.” (Garraty 110). John Adams dismissed it as something he had said time and time again. “The tone of the debate changed sharply as Paine’s slashing attack took effect.” (Garraty 110). A committee was appointed by Congress, consisting of Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, and many more. “The committee had asked Jefferson to prepare a draft” that would soon become known as the Declaration of Independence. (Garraty 112). It consisted of two parts: an introduction which justified the abstract right of any people to revolt and described the theory on which the Americans based their creation of a new, republican government, and a second part that made George III, rather than Parliament, look like the ‘bad guy’. “…The king was the personification of the nation against which the nation was rebelling.” (Garraty 112). “The Declaration was intended to influence foreign opinion, but it had little immediate effect outside Great Britain, and there it only made people angry and determined to subdue the rebels.
The American revolution took place during the years 1775-1778. During this time, America claimed their independence towards Britain. Britain’s was colonist and government explanation more territory the United States of America In April 1775 the American and British soldiers when a conflict in the colonist. The British want to have a power and control the all states with the government laws. The Continental Congress Declaration of Independence, which proclaims the independence of the United States of America from Great Britain. The first major American opposition to British policy came in 1765 after Parliament passed the Stamp Act, a taxation measure to raise revenues for a standing British army in America. The Continental Congress in July 1776 Richard Henry had been the Proclamation Act and the Quebec. The British do it the monarchy told who to do in America, but America civil don’t want
The esteemed patriot and my good friend and neighbor, Samuel Adams, tells me that he has received word from “A Virginian who wrote home from London that King George’s own House of Commons says he is ‘very obstinate’ and ‘shan’t continue to reign with any peaceable conduct toward the colonies’.” (Langguth, 28)
“He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people” (Declaration of Independence). This grievance sheds light on the fact that during the war, British troops burned several American towns. It also proves the cruelty King George exhibited toward the Americans. Readers can relate this back to the Declaration of Independence justifying separation from the King due to the fact that it shows how he has robbed and destroyed the lives of many Americans. Furthermore, the King also showed cruelty in the sea. “He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands” (Declaration of Independence). In December of 1775, the British parliament passed a law that essentially allowed the British navy to capture ships attempting to trade with America. Anyone who was on these ships was then compelled to fight for the British, regardless if that meant fighting against their own people. This proves how cold-hearted and cruel King George was. Moreover, the Declaration of Independence proved how King George was unfit to rule any nation. “He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty &