According to Daniel Elazer, there are three separate manifestations of the American political culture. Daniel states that there wasn’t just one political culture that there was three, these being moralistic, individualistic, and traditionalistic. Daniel states that each individual state has a culture type of the three that were named above. He shows that the southern states are more of the traditionalistic type. Elazer goes on to explain that migration in the 19th century gave pattern to the dominant cultures, and that migration was happening from east to west. As these people migrated throughout the United States not only did they move to get a new life or so to say a fresh start, these people also took their values with them. Dominant culture …show more content…
are only a part of what he explains, he going on to say that in many states there are sub-cultures are right along with the dominant cultures. So, with that being said some of the three moralistic, individualistic, and traditionalistic will or may be in that area. The patterns of migration in the 20th century and this happen between north to south, accounting for the mixing of culture types (Thomas Y. Crowell, 1972). The political machine or as I have also heard political boss of this country comes from getting off the boat, join a group and you are good as long as you vote the way you are suppose to vote, which sounds like bad business.
The city machine helps defines an individualistic culture and these bosses come from the bigger cities of the northern states (Missouri State University, June, 2012). The older Southern states coming in at being more traditionalistic or in other words, “what’s best for us’’ and this tended more to the rich white land owners even though lots of people including lower or middle class whites fell into this along with African Americans. So, it’s not necessarily whites vs. blacks, it more like rich whites land owners vs. everyone else. West Virginia falls under more of the strong traditional political culture but, some of the moralistic trait, as well as some individualistic. We will look in the pages to come of how this affects West Virginia and is it beneficial for the state (Robert Jay Dilger, Richard A. Brisbin, 2008). Considering that the state of West Virginia sits between the south and the northern, it makes sense that it would get a little bit of all, but the south thought process of traditionalistic hold just a bit strong then the …show more content…
others. Growing up in Pocahontas, Virginia on the West Virginia boarder in a coal mining town and with a coaling mining family you can see the impact of political culture.
Coal mines have driven the state of West Virginia since the state has been established. The state of West Virginia has never been an on the top state and in my opinion never will be. Without coal or the federal governments assisting in bring jobs to the state, West Virginia will always fall short of the stick. There are a couple things you can do in West Virginia to keep you and your family afloat, you can join the military, work in corrections sense there is prison and jails all over the state, get an education which people struggle to support themselves and end up dropping out, or illegally sell prescription drugs. I’m not promoting selling drugs or in favor of it, it’s the hard truth of this state. West Virginia also leads the nation in the highest rates of overdoses from prescription drugs use (K. Loften ,2016, March 29). This all ties into what West Virginians like to do, is to blame big government for their down fall. Traditional, the people of West Virginia believe that it’s the federal government fault for the coal industry crashing in the state. The people of West Virginia beliefs system is off of coal mining, but there is a divide in the state now. You have part of the state that is for coal and the other half against coal for various reasons. Coal fuel no matter how you look at it, is harmful to the
environment, the removal of coal and the cleaning of coal. Starting with the damage that coal does to an individual, for example coal has major impact on the lungs. Miners are exposed to toxic chemical even when cleaning coal, the metal particles in the air are also harmful to their bodies. Most miners suffer from black lung, other respiratory diseases and even cancer, then mostly effects the miners digging deep in the earth. Surface mining also has it major downfalls as well, the use of explosives with the large amounts of dust also affect their lungs. Surface mining or mountaintop removal creates problems for all in that community. If your family lives off of well water, mountain top removal can cause all of what is being blown up at the top to run down the mountain into the families’ water system causing this to drink harmful chemicals that has been mixed into the air and water (Craig Williams, 2015). This leads me to believe that some do not care that this will cause cancer, lung diseases, or even the risk of being crashed by
A Not So 50:50 Nation Culture Wars? The Myth of a Polarized America: Book Review The book Culture Wars? The Myth of a Polarized America by Morris P. Fiorina, Samuel J. Abrams, and Jeremy C. Pope is a persuasive text regarding America and its division on political topics. In chapter one, Fiorina begins with a powerful quote from Pat Buchanan’s 1992 speech at the Republican National Convention, “There is a religious war…a cultural war as critical to the…nation…as the cold war…for this war is for the soul of America” (Fiorina et al. 1).
Increasingly over the past two decades and in part thanks to the publication of James Davison Hunter’s book, Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America, the idea of a culture war in American politics has been gaining attention. While the tension between conservatives and liberals is palpable, it’s intensity has proven hard to measure. However, it doesn’t seem that many Americans are polarized on the topic of polarization as most would agree that the culture war is real (Fiorina, 2005). This thinking is what prompted Morris Fiorina to write the book Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. In it, Fiorina outlines an argument against the idea of a culture war by looking at party affiliation by states, how public opinion on hot button issues changed over time and various explanations for why Americans are so hung up on the topic of polarization. While Fiorina makes a good argument, the evidence supporting the culture war is too powerful to explain away.
There really is not one uniform way of life in America. But if you look back on the past, you can definitely see some similarities. With the article, “What Is an American”, it explains what early life may have been for these new residents. “They receive ample awards for their labors ; these accumulated rewards produce them lands.” So early life here was simple and strived on working. But as the years progressed so did the people. By the nineteen-hundreds, Franklin D, Roosevelt had described life here with ease, using terms like, “ all bound together by hope of a common future.” He goes on to describe the ever-changing life with a boast about, “unity in language and speech”. Even today common life here is brought by these factors of similarities. We all share the love and pride we have for this place. Still, America has one difference, and that is cultures. “Live in a culture of multiple cultures” as briefly spoken by the article Cultural Common. Daily life here is usually different between all of us, but we still strive to make it amazing
Many studies try to measure political culture within states, but some political scientists are wary of assigning state political cultures because such measurements may be of dubious empirical grounding. While the process may not be entirely empirically sound, different state political cultures seem to exist and demand further analysis. In 1966, Daniel Elazar published his now famous assessment of United States’ political cultures. His evaluation of state cultures has been the focus of much study and criticism over the past three decades. Elazar proposes that the political culture in the United States developed in different regions due to east to west migratory patterns moving across the continent. Patterns of political culture were established during the Western frontier migration, as individuals followed “lines of least resistance which generally led them due west from the immediately previous area of settlement” (Elazar, 1966: 99). As a result, like-minded individuals migrated together and stayed together, causing similar political ideology to transform into a dominant political culture (Elazar, 1994).
In his article A Changing Labor Force and Race Relations in Virginia, T.H. Breen argues that a changing composition of the Virginian labor force in the last half of the seventeenth century propelled Virginia from chronic disorder to stability. But why was there a change in the labor force? Breen buttresses his claim by pointing to Virginian planters who exploited their two forms of cheap labor to the point of rebellion.
But, it also speaks to the wider systematic polarization within the American political system. Political polarization in the United States is a result of cultural and geographical polarization. South V. North, Republican V. Democrat and is firmly rooted in regional history. The cowboy persona which some of these Presidents and politicians choose to adopt, is inherently linked to the physical geographical place from which they hail and the role that place has played in the unfolding of American history. It shapes the character of, (as of yet at least) “the man”, his administration and ultimately the policy of the country for at least four years. The image and persona adopted by these men is nurtured by the regional culture and history of the place that they reside and represent. It can be seen in every president from Kennedy to Reagan and Bush to Obama.
To best understand how culture has changed, one must take into account the way it once was and what circumstances helped to alter it. Traditionally, living in the United States had comprised of a much more community-oriented culture. (Kingdon) This was especially true in the days before the automobile (and the railroad to a small extent) when communities were more isolated from mass movement, migration, and displacement of its denizens. Before the Baby Boom and especially before the Industrial Revolution, the American landscape, even on the east coast, was comprised of primarily isolated village communities and distinct urban centers. Travel and economic factors (economies were more localized then) created an environment where it was quite easy and possible for an individual to grow up, live and work, marry, and die in their hometown community. Hence, since people were more lik...
The whites are mainly known for their wild and criminal ways, as they are for their Hill Billy tap dancing. West Virginia is the poorest state in the United States. Being the poorest state in the United States, the education system is not as we would expect. Without an education or available employment, the whites resorted to becoming a corrupt family to survive in the declining economy of West Virginia. Corruption within the White Family began when the father Ray White was murdered.
The United States is an immense country, with many residents and citizens descending from immigrants who have influenced many customs, traditions, behaviors and ways of life. Unlike many old world nations, the United States does not have a homogenous population or a traditional homeland. However, American culture can be interpreted as being largely based in Western Europe with influences from the Native Indians, Africans, Asians, and elsewhere.
The energy producing market has always been a staple in Pennsylvania's history. Being rich in coal, natural gas, and other forms of energy, Pennsylvania has produced much of the nation's fuel or electricity. With a location so rich in coal, companies began to open many mines in order to either stay ahead of competitors, improve production, or for easier transportation of the commodity. The large amounts of coal being mined ushered in the many railroad systems bringing another powerful business to Pennsylvania. Coal barons, mine owners, made gross amounts of money off of the hard work from miners. Coal had played such a integral role in the Keystone State that it led to some towns being named after the industry such Carbondale and Minersville. Pennsylvania quickly became associated with coal in America and whenever there was news about the state, coal was mentioned with it. Especially during both World Wars, Pennsylvania was looked to for providing energy used both at home and in the war effort. This supply shock meant mine operations needed to run efficiently and both the Federal government and the presidents during each respective time ensured the productivity would meet the great demand. Coal mining was at an all time high until tragedy struck on 22 January 1959, when the River Slope mine's roof collapsed because of the Susquehanna River causing flooding to the mine killing many workers. The disaster marked the beginning of the end to deep mining in Pennsylvania. To this day however, Pennsylvania remains strongly associated with the harvesting of many energy sources.
Political culture is broadly shared values, beliefs, and attitudes about how government and society should function. Gov. Rick Perry speaks supporting strong Texas state government and minimal federal government intervention. Based on Texas’s founding origins, and experiences and orientation toward the marketplace (pro big business), who should participate in government, and the role of government. The three state political culture categories are moralistic, individualistic, and traditionalistic. Texas is a mix of traditionalistic and moralistic according to our textbook. The moralistic New England Puritanism view of the common good, government should promote public good. Individualistic view of government to provide order and protect property
In the text, “The American Cultural Configuration” the authors express the desire of anthropologists to study their own culture despite the difficulty that one faces attempting to subjectively analyze their own society. Holmes and Holmes (2002), use the adage “not being able to see the forest through the trees” (p. 5) to refer to how hard it is for someone to study something they have largely taken for granted. The Holmes' article focuses predominately on paradoxes within our own culture, many of which we don't notice. In a paradox, two contradicting statements can appear to be true at the same time. This essay looks at two paradoxes commonly found in everyday life: the individual versus the family and religion.
1) What is political culture? What is the makeup of the political culture in the United States? Give two examples of how the political culture of the United States helps to unite Americans, even in disagreement.
The idea of political culture is found within the state’s history. The history of the state is impacted by the people settled in the region, religious backgrounds, and geography. The history of the state influences the attitudes and beliefs that people hold regarding their political system. Daniel Elazar theorized a connection between the states’ history and attitude towards government by explaining differences in government between states. Every state is different with some common ground. Elazar’s theory divides states into three types: moralistic, traditionalistic and individualistic. The state’s constitution defines the powers of government with political culture bias. Because of the state constitution, the political culture influences the power and limitations of governors, legislative, and judiciaries.
The American Political System The American political system is a federal system, which consists of