Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The impact of Roosevelt's new deal
Populist movement political changes
The impact of Roosevelt's new deal
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The lifeblood of a successful society is the ability to feed its families. The greatest civilizations were those who were able to harness the power of agriculture and promote it for the expanding power of their region. From ancient Mesopotamia to Jeffersonian America the government advocates and supporters of agriculture had positively benefitted those civilizations and helped them reach greater heights. Thomas Jefferson’s America was an overall pro-agrarian state; however, it was not until the 1890’s in which the United States began the modern era ideals of government justly assisting the agricultural forces in America. The American farmer during the late 1800’s was one who was struggling severely to make ends meet due to massive overproduction, …show more content…
which in a 27 year period caused the price of wheat to fall from $1.06 a bushel to 63¢ a bushel, corn from 43¢ to 30¢ a bushel, and cotton from 15¢ a pound to 6¢ a pound (Farmers/Populist). This began a devastating period for the farmer, and while the industries and banks of the United States boomed, the farmer was left behind in a heap of despair and poverty. This era of great economic pangs for the farmer gave birth to one of the most renowned political forces in American history: the Populists.
The Populists demanded better treatment for the farmer and demanded that the government begin to intervene on behalf of the agricultural industries in order to allow farmers the ability to live. The Populists began a crusade against the forces which they saw were destroying the interests of the farmer, most notably the banks and the railroads. The railroads gave unfair deals to the farming community and charged them substantially higher compared to other industries, and banks continued to facilitate extreme interest rates for agricultural enterprises. It was this climate for agriculture, coupled with overproduction, that left the farmer in a situation of great economic woe. Thus, the Populists rallied behind the message of regulation of the groups that threatened the livelihood of success agriculture and began to make huge gains in government, controlling twelve state governments, electing three senators, six governors, and over fifty house representatives. From here the Populists continued to gain steam and eventually dissolved to join the Democratic Party and began to promote the pro-agricultural message on America’s biggest …show more content…
stage. Through the efforts of the Populists, a new era of progress was achieved that would forever change America, and through Populist set government reforms various industries that were once hostile to the farmer were now obliged to demonstrate fair business practices to their agricultural counterparts. Not only did the Populist farmers defend their rights against vast monopolistic corporations, but as well fought for the American people and helped bring new regulations and reforms concerning food preparation, manufacturing, labor rights, suffrage expansion, and a myriad of other amazing advancements for America. Yet, the fight for the rights of farmers was far from over.
Even after the end of the rise of Populist Party, the farmer still faced problems economically throughout the United States. In the 1920’s the world economy collapsed and with it the agricultural industries were left in a wake of destruction that would require vast reform in order for the country’s farmers to continue to sustain. During the Hoover administration, the government began a program of buying various crops en masse to ensure that the farming industries were able to stay afloat amongst the turmoil of the Great Depression. Sadly, this initiative failed due to farmers growing more in order make more money by selling to the government, which continued to flood the market and drive prices down. In 1932 the agricultural industry changed forever with the election of the pro-farmer governor of New York, Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Roosevelt’s New Deal gave life to the downtrodden farmer and through various legislative initiatives such as the Agricultural Adjustment Act, Civilian Conservation Corps, Farm Security Administration, and Soil Conservation Service. It was through these acts by Roosevelt that the present day government interaction with the agricultural industries began under the principle of helping keep prices high and production low in order to maximize monetary output of the farmers. Roosevelt’s reforms also gave strength to the farming community by giving them access to better interest rates. As well,
the pro-union policies gave strength to the country’s largest labor union, the National Farmer’s Union. The National Farmer’s Union represents the power of the farming community and throughout its long and historic tenure has fought for the rights of the average farmer. It was from the power of the unified voice of the farmer demanding just treatment that change was able to take place. And it was from this unified voice that a bunch of angry farmers changed the United States of America.
Farmers united to protect their interests, even creating a major political party. The party was called the peoples party which became known as the populist party. Populists drew its strength from rural areas. Populists tended to be poor and uneducated. They had ideas such as government ownership of major industries. The Populists supported labors demand for an eight hour work day. The most controversial Populist demand concerned the money supply. Farmers being both sellers and debtors, saw inflation as a way to improve their standard of living, but they wanted to expand the money supply. Farmers convinced the government to use silver as well as gold to back the money supply. The congress passed the Bland-Allison Act and the Sherman Silver Purchase. Populist platform urged congress to authorize free and unlimited minting of silver. The Populists were united in favoring the minting of silver to expand the money supply. Democrats agreed with the Populist, but most Republicans favored the gold standard and a smaller money supply. Democrats agreed on a presidential candidate that was with the mint silver, wh...
While farmers sold millions of bushels, and bales of wheat, cotton and corn, state legislatures began to see a need to enforce laws upon these farmers and to gain control of their states and its people. Document C gives a good statement of legislature holding down railroads and the goods being transported. Document C states a prairie farmer , "...they carried a law through the Illinois legislature, which provides for the limiting of freight rates by a board of officials appointed for this purpose." Angered by these types of laws, farmers who used these railroads went against the laws in court.
... This then led to another party being formed, the populist party. This party had the belief that cities depended on farms, yet farms did not depend on cities. William Jennings Brian supported this idea in his speech, quoted in document J. In which elaborates on the opposition to gold standards and supports the silver standards that would better benefit farmers. The changes in American agriculture were shaped by three key factors, economic change, government policy and technology, in the period of 1865-1900.
The farmers of the late 1800s had many reasons for being dissatisfied with their situation. Unfair railroad practices, such as rebates and drawbacks, hurt them severely. Even common issues of shortage of money, drought, and mortgages were all issues that hurt farmers economically. The farmers of the period, though, used these issues to change the shape of American politics.
The Roaring Twenties approached and the citizens in Colorado were facing rough times. In 1920, many people such as farm owners, manufacturers, and even miners were having a hard time making a living due to an economic downfall. The farmers especially, where facing the toughest of times. The price of various farm-grown goods like wheat, sugar beets, and even cattle was dropping because their goods were no longer needed by the public. Wheat had dropped in price from $2.02 in 1918 to $0.76 by the time 1921 came around. Sadly, the land that they were using to grow wheat became dry and many farmers had to learn to grow through “dryland farming” which became very popular in the eastern plains from 1910 to 1930 (Hard Times: 1920 - 1940). Apple trees began to die due to the lack of desire for apples, poor land, and decreased prices. Over the course of World War I, the prices of farm goods began to increase slowly. Farmers were not the only one facing this economic hardship while others in big cities were enjoying the Roaring Twenties.
When populism was first used in the United States in the late 1800s, it was geared towards the farmers. The focus on farmers showed the interest the Populists had toward working class people, who made up the majority of the nation. Even though there were more working class people than wealthy, it was the wealthy business owners who ruled society. They ran political machines and monopolies and did not provide the best working and living conditions for their employees. William Jennings Bryan said, “There are two ideas of government...those who believe that if you just legislate to make the well-to-do prosperous that their prosperity will leak through on those below. The Democratic idea...if you legislate to make the masses prosperous their prosperity
Farmer’s discontent during the period 1870 – 1900 had an impact on their attitudes and actions towards politics. During this period manufacturing had a growth spurt and agricultural started to decline. This made it harder for the farmers to make a decent living. For example in document G it shows how much manufacturing increased between the 50 years. America could no longer dream to be a nation of small freehold farms. Manufacturers and people living in big cities depended on farmers to supply everything. Many people didn’t realize how much of an affect farmers had on their lives. If somebody was to take farms away, everything would have completely crashed.
High prices forced farmers to concentrate on one crop. The large-scale farmers bought expensive machines, increasing their crop yield. This caused the smaller farmers to be left behind. The small farmers could no longer compete and were forced give up their farms and look for jobs in the cities. The smaller farmers who stayed blamed their troubles on banks and railroads. In the 1890’s western and southern farmers came together to make up the political party called the Populist Party. Their plan was to take control of the White House; then they could solve all their problems.
Farmers everywhere in the United States during the late nineteenth century had valid reasons to complaint against the economy because the farmers were constantly being taken advantage of by the railroad companies and banks. All farmers faced similar problems and for one thing, farmers were starting to become a minority within the American society. In the late nineteenth century, industrialization was in the spotlight creating big businesses and capitals. The success of industrialization put agriculture and farmers on the down low, allowing the corporations to overtake the farmers. Since the government itself; such as the Republican Party was also pro-business during this time, they could have cared less about the farmers.
In all the history of America one thing has been made clear, historians can’t agree on much. It is valid seeing as none of them can travel back in time to actually experience the important events and even distinguish what has value and what doesn’t. Therefore all historians must make a leap and interpret the facts as best they can. The populist movement does not escape this paradox. Two views are widely accepted yet vastly different, the views of Richard Hofstadter and Lawrence Goodwyn. They disagree on whether populists were “isolated and paranoid bigots” or “sophisticated, empathetic egalitarians”; whether their leaders were “opportunists who victimized them” or “visionary economic theorists who liberated them”; whether their beliefs were rooted in the free silver campaign of the 1890s or the cooperative movement of the 1880s; and finally whether their ideal society was in the “agrarian past” or “the promise of a cooperative future”. They could not agree on anything, over all Richard Hofstadter seems to have a better idea of the truth of populism.
The farmers feared that Eastern industrialists and bankers were gaining too much influence, power and control over the government. During the “bust” cycle, and times of difficulties, farmers got together, talked about their problems and formed the Populist Party. The Populists were formed because of challenges and difficulties in which they were forced to deal with every day. These challenges included crop failures, falling prices, and the inability to pay loans. The Populists party called for reform by wanting the government to intervene and lessen the impact of economic depressions, regu...
After settlements were established, farmers opposed the government. The farmers united to form their opposing union that would lead their opposing movement and solve their common problems that they had with economic distress and railroads. The grange and farmers´ alliances surged with the quest to get the government to support them. The rise of the populist party caused a scare and panic to other government groups, but it didn´t last, the populist party collapsed.
As you walk to the other end of the stage and look out into the sea of blue and gold corduroy, you realize this it! This is the moment you’ve worked toward for the last four years. You’ve stayed long hours after school working on you record book, spent grueling hours memorizing speeches, experienced the joy of winning first place at a state CDE contest, and best of all you met so many amazing people and doors were opened to opportunities you never imagined. Finally, after all of your hard work, you’re receiving your State FFA Degree! All of this from making one simple decision your freshman year of high school, signing up for the FFA. What you didn’t realize at the time was that this wonderful organization would help you build leadership skills and teach life skills that you are going to need in the coming years.
Most of the reasons concerning agrarian discontent in the late nineteenth century stem from supposed threats posed by monopolies and trusts, railroads, money shortages and the demonetization of silver, though in many cases their complaints were not valid. The American farmer at this time already had his fair share of problems, perhaps even perceived as unfair in regards to the success industrialized businessmen were experiencing. Nevertheless, crops such as cotton and wheat, which were once the staples of an agricultural society, were selling at such low prices that it was nearly impossible for farmers to make a profit off them, especially since some had invested a great deal of money in modern equipment that would allow them to produce twice as many goods. Furthermore, improvements in transportation allowed foreign competition to emerge, making it harder for American Farmers to not only dispose of surplus crop, but to transport crops period. Finally, years of drought in the Midwest and the degeneration of business in the 1890's devastated many of the nation's farmers, and as a result of this agricultural depression' many farm groups, most notably the Populist Party, arose to fight what farmers saw as the reasons for the decline of agriculture.
Nevertheless, this social injustice was the reason that leads to the farmers’ Revolt, seeking to remedy their condition. In the late 1870s, an alliance has been founded in forty-three states that afterwards developed into a political party the populists. The party’s goal was to replace the democrats (capitalists) as the nation’s second party and being able to return the stolen privileges and rights of the poor producing class. By 1892 the party issued a document called the platform. It addressed the farmers’ nation and their conditions. Also, it “put forth a long list of proposals to restore democracy and economic opportunity”(Foner, 2013,p.642) and to create the social conditions of freedom.