Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on the advantages on prayer at schools
Freedom of speech in education
Why public prayer shall not be allowed in schools
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on the advantages on prayer at schools
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” In the very beginning of this statement, it clearly says “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…” No one can deny the right of anyone under the hand of the Constitution the right to pray or to express their personal beliefs. From a Christian standpoint, I, of course, want prayer to be allowed in schools, but Christianity isn’t the only religion that uses prayer as a form of worship. Religions such as Islam, Judaism, and Buddhism, among others, also pray. Imagine being a follower of any religion that prays and being told that you cannot partake in your religious activities because it is offensive. That is being denied your First Amendment rights and is unconstitutional. Allowing prayer in schools, however, worries many people on the note that it would cause ostracization among students who differ in religious beliefs. Overall, I believe that prayer …show more content…
should be allowed in our schools. This issue is important because, not only Christians but people of many faiths, struggle with being open about their religious beliefs. Being unable to pray or practice their religion would be, in a way, denying them their rights according to the First Amendment of the Constitution. Ramifications caused by the presence of prayer in our school systems could include those such as being left out due to religious differences. Being of a religion that participates in prayer and being denied the basic necessity of freedom of religion in a place, such as a school, is against the First Amendment. Of the first 108 universities in the United States, 106 of them were distinctly Christian, including the very first, which was Harvard University. Our own national motto is “In God we trust,” and I believe that because if we, as a nation, can proclaim that we trust in God, that we can allow prayer in our schools. Congress has prayed at the opening of every session since the very beginning. In a moment of crisis at the first Continental Congress, Benjamin Franklin prayed that they would receive the help and guidance that they needed. Congress has begun with prayer ever since. If the government can pray in their sessions, why can't the people who are governed pray in their school sessions? To resolve this issue of prayer not being allowed in schools, we should allow the ones who wish to partake in the activity of prayer to pray, and those who do not wish to pray will not be made to.
The choice of prayer should be given to each and every person, just as the choice of religion is given to them. The ability to perform their own religious activities, as long as they are not disruptive, should not be stripped from the schools. In fact, the Supreme Court did not ban prayer or religion from public schools. It only restricted the ability of government officials to invoke government-initiated worship. Public school students have the right to pray on their own time, so it should not be frowned
upon. Since prayer was excluded from schools, the nation has been on a steady moral decline. Former Secretary of Education William Bennett revealed in his cultural indexes that between the years 1960 and 1990 there was a steady moral decline. During this period after prayer was taken out of schools, divorce doubled, teenage pregnancy went up by 200%, teen suicide rates increased by 300%, child abuse reached an all-time high, violent crime went up 500%, and abortion increased 1000%. There is a strong relationship between the exclusion of prayer from our schools and the drop in morality. By allowing prayer back in schools, these high rates of many awful things could be lowered as a reverse effect. Negative outcomes of the decision to permit prayer could possibly be ridicule placed upon those who participate in such religious activities, as well as those who do not. An example of such ridicule could be if a student was placed in a situation where other students participated in prayer. This particular student could be nonreligious, and not partake in the praying. His or her fellow students could call him or her names or make rude comments about how they did not pray. No matter how much I support prayer being allowed in our public schools, I don’t want bullying to be caused by it either. By allowing prayer, however, it could change the behaviors and outlooks of many students, regardless of their religions or lack thereof, as well as guarantee them all rights to their own religion. I believe that prayer should be permitted in schools because everyone is guaranteed the right to religious freedoms, and by not allowing them to partake in those religious activities is denying them their rights according to the Constitution. Our nation needs prayer, now more than ever, seeing that the lack of morality has taken over. Prayer needs to be placed back in the hands that it was stripped away from. Our nation was founded on religious principles, and the fact that we have stolen those principles and stashed them away, as well as calling them “unconstitutional” is wrong. Christians, like myself and many others, want to be allowed to pray just as much as the multitudes of people who profess other religions that partake in prayer. I hope and pray that our nation brings prayer back, and if you don’t agree, then I’ll pray for you, too.
The First Amendment states “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”. There are several ways to apply this to the issue of prayer in school. Arguments can be made for both groups of people who are for and against prayer in school. What does it all boil down to? Freedom of religion still applies, just do not organize or endorse it in our schools.
There are many different philosophies regarding prayer in public school. It seems to be a difficult issue to decide upon. The opinions are wide-ranging and convoluted. This paper will attempt to highlight the many ideas and opinions as to whether prayers in public school should be allowed and to what extent. It will further show how our founders' idea of a separate church and state has been taken out of context and why prayer in school should be allowed, but not required.
Praying in school was first addressed in the Supreme Court in 1962 in the Engle v. Vitale case. The Establishment Clause inserted and stated Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion. The court ruled the Union Free School District in Hyde Park, NY had violated the First Amendment by directing the principals to cause the following prayer to be said aloud by each class in the presence of a teacher at the beginning of each school day: “Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence upon Thee, and we beg thy blessings upon us, our parents, our teachers and our Country” (Longley, "Public"). I agree with the court ruling because not all students in a classroom share the same beliefs. To cause everyone to say this prayer surely violates their rights.
until the middle of the 20th century, organized prayer and Bible reading were practiced by public schools across the country. In 1961, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled school prayer to be unconstitutional in the landmark case, Engel v. Vitale. Just two years later, in another landmark case, the court would decide that school sanctioned Bible readings and other similar religious activities should not be allowed as well (http://www.oyez.org/cases). Should these rulings continue to stand in this country? Yes. The government of the United States of America should continue to disallow prayer in the public school system. Praying public schools ...
In recent years, teaching religion, or the individual practice of religion in school, has become a very controversial topic. There are many different views on this matter and even more opinions on how it should be handled. There are people on both sides of the spectrum; there are those who believe that it should be taught and allowed in school, and those who believe it should not be taught or practiced in school. If the practice of religion were an option in public schools, students may become more tolerant, as well as knowledgeable, of religions and cultures beyond their own. Secondly, a time interval during the day may be implemented into the school schedule to allow the practice of student’s personal beliefs. Finally, since prayer was eliminated from public school systems, the nation has seen a decrease in education and the increase in crime rate. Even though public schools today are without school prayer, most schools have replaced prayer with a "silent moment of reflection." Prayer should be established into schools, because it generates the exposure to other cultures, allows a calming period for students, and creates well-rounded individuals in society.
Prayer in School: Good or Bad? As secular humanists and groups like the Christian Coalition are at war with each other regarding prayer in high schools behind closed doors in Washington DC, the average high school kid is the one that gets caught in the middle. For years now there has been a heated debate about whether or not prayer should be allowed in school. Every time the argument is rekindled, it ends in a stalemate, and is a topic that campaigning politicians tend to stay away from.
Freedom of religion is a right that is granted to all citizens under the First Amendment of United States Constitution (U.S. Const. amend I). This gives individuals the freedom to express their religious views however they may please. Controversy arises when the topic of religion is brought up in schools. A great example scenario is when a student submits an assignment representing Jesus Christ when asked to come up with a paper and drawing of their hero. It is important to understand what rights students have when it comes to incorporating religion in their schoolwork. This paper will examine the legal issues regarding the grading and display of the assignment containing religious expression that is submitted by a student and how the First Amendment applies to classroom assignments in schools.
The first and fourteenth amendments to the constitution establish the rules that apply to school prayer. The first amendment says: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. The 14th Amendment of the Constitution has several clauses; the clause that pertains to school prayer is the Equal Protection Clause requiring each state to provide equal protection under the law to all people within that state. What this means is, each student in the school is protected from being forced to pray in school in any certain way.
wrong to many, but when religion has a home in public schools, it singles out
Another valid point is that it goes against what our country was built upon. America was formed because the colonists wanted religious freedom. When our Founding Fathers came to the States over from England, one of main issues was that over in England, religion was forced upon the people and individual choices as to what to believe weren’t an option. When our countries Founding Fathers wrote the constitution, they were very careful about granting the freedom of separation of church and state. Many Americans feel that having prayer in school would indeed violate that part of our constitution.
"God help, I'm so lost!" If you listen carefully, this is a common thought that is heard throughout many schools in the nation. Is this thought appropriate? The following statement clearly shows that the law allows students and adults to practice religion, but at the same time be respective of others and their beliefs even if they do believe or if they don't. "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, or to petition the government for a redress of grievances." (First Amendment, The Constitution of the United States). Prayer is not normally permitted as a scheduled part of classroom activities, because it would result in the violation of the principle of church-state separation, which has been defined by court interpretations of the 1st Amendment to the U.S, Constitution. The separation principle is extended to Public school as an arm of the government, with an exception which can be permitted if, during the school year, a mixture of prayers, statements, etc are delivered, using material derived from a number of different religions and secular sources. So far, this has never been tried in a school or ruled upon by a court (Religion in Public).
Religion is one of the most controversial issues in society today. The concern of allowing prayer in schools is an on-going debate and has resulted in numerous lawsuits. Religious school clubs, after school activities, curriculums, and moments of silence during school are just a few of the court cases that judges have administered. People in favor of prayer in schools believe that their children can only learn certain values through religious practice. On the other hand, an individual against religious practice in schools views this issue as an infringement on his or her children’s rights as Americans.
In the Constitution, it says that Congress will not make a law respecting an establishment of religion or one that restricts the free exercise of it. If Congress cannot uphold or restrict religion, should our schools be able to? Schools allow too much religious freedom for their students and restrict nonreligious students by allowing religious students several exceptions to various rules. These exceptions can infuriate parents and students alike. Expressing religion in schools is unnecessary and can cause tension; therefore, it should not be permitted in public schools.
Annie Laurie Gaylor quoted Thomas Jefferson in her article The Case Against School Prayer, “No citizen shall be compelled to frequent or support any religious worship, place, or ministry whatsoever…” and that to “compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of [religious] opinions which he disbelieves is sinful and tyrannical” (Gaylor, 1995, p. 7). No man should have to be subject to anything that he does not believe in. Prayer should not be allowed in the public school system because of the idea of separation of church and state and the First Amendment.
Before starting the concept mad and breaking down the issue, I knew that school prayer was a social issue but never knew why. From my point of view, I would say that school prayer should be allowed, except limiting what they can do. For example, a class has the moment of silence, but the other students who have different beliefs can have their own time where they do their prayers and practices.