Allegory Of The Cave Comparison Essay

450 Words1 Page

Allegory of the Cave Comparison In modern literature, characters may be influenced into a false reality through various obstacles surrounding them. Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave” is a philosophical work in which Socrates speaks to Glaucon, his student, about a hypothetical situation in which prisoners are chained to a wall from birth. D.H. Lawrence's “The Rocking Horse Winner” is a short story in which a boy named Paul has supernatural abilities to predict horse racing winners to win money for his mother Hester. Although “The Allegory of The Cave” and “The Rocking Horse Winner” appear to be completely different works, similarities can be found in both writings when one analyzes the false realities the characters experience. In “The Allegory …show more content…

This false reality holds them back from finding enlightenment. Likewise In “The Rocking Horse Winner,” the narrator states “Only she knew that at the center of her heart was a hard little place that could not feel love, no, not for anybody. ” This quote shows Hester’s false reality is that her son does not love her, and she cannot love her son. She also believes money is the most important thing in life, and that money will solve all of her problems. Both of these writings show examples of false realities in different ways. These stories show how false realities can cause negative emotional growth in people. In conclusion, the prisoners and Hester’s false realities keep them from living their lives to their full potential. False realities appear in “ The Allegory of the Cave” and “The Rocking Horse Winner.” Prisoners miss out on living their lives because they refuse to believe the escaped prisoner. Likewise, Hester never gets to make an emotional connection with her children because she refuses to believe that they love her. Although the stories are very different, they both share the same message about false realities: they can trick someone into believing something that isn't

Open Document