All Lives Matter Meaning

Those who subscribe to the premise of ‘All Lives Matter’ intentionally undermine the ‘Black Lives Matter’ movement and are subconsciously/consciously racist. The fundamental premise of ‘All Lives Matter’ is moral by definition, however, the logic underlying the premise is often unaddressed and ignorant. We often hear the phrase ‘All Lives Matter’ uttered in response to expressions of the ‘Black Lives Matter’ movement: typically, by those of us who haven’t been exposed to the sociocultural divide. Understandably, your current response may be ‘All lives do matter though, not just black lives’ you’re correct, however, you remain ignorant to the foundation of the ‘Black Lives Matter’ movement and its intent. ‘Black Lives Matter’ aims to emphasise

The intended sentiment by each term is identical, all lives matter equally, however, the intent of the ‘All Lives Matter’ slogan is to undermine and criticise a movement that incites the requirement for governmental, judicial and societal reformation. ‘Black Lives Matter’ provokes the necessity for the progressive restructure of regressive ideals regarding the predisposed discrepancy of worth between races: through the empowerment of black people rallying together with their multicultural allies.

It’s unequivocal that the ‘All Lives Matter’ slogan is a retaliated response to the ‘Black Lives Matter’ movement, as the mention of the slogan followed the exposure of ‘Black Lives Matter’. It’s no timely coincidence, indicating the term’s premise to intentionally undermine the progressive movement. Seemingly, the statement ‘Black Lives Matter’ makes us uncomfortable. It appears that the operative word inciting discomfort and offence is ‘black’. Why? Why does the word ‘black’ but not ‘blue’ make us uncomfortable? The reason for unrest is subjective and a culmination of often subconscious racism, however, the phrase ‘colour-blind’ is of significance. I, as a young white woman

If you still deny or doubt the integrity of the movement, the following statements are sufficient reasons as to why ‘Black Lives Matter’ is valid and necessary. People of colour are treated differently: failing to acknowledge that is simply ignorant. The generalisations and stereotypes inflicted upon black people is extremely detrimental and unfortunately life threatening. This is demonstrably evident when investigating the epidemic that is police brutality, specifically in America. Black people are three times more likely to be killed by police, and accounted for 25% of those killed despite being a mere 13% of the American population as of the 25th of August 2017, (Mapping Police Violence, 2017). Understandably, contextual evidence is required to support the integrity of these statistics, as police violence is always warranted and circumstantial, right? Wrong. This is proven when comparing those subjected to police brutality, 30% of unarmed black men were killed in comparison to 21% of unarmed white men (Mapping Police Violence, 2017). The discrepancy between these values is often wrongly justified by a multitude of reasons including: the area the incident occurred and its corresponding crime rate. However, crime rate does not influence the occurrence of police brutality, yet the location does. Demonstrated when comparing