Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Envy and jealousy essays
Introduction to an essay discussing the role played by jealousy
Definition of jealousy essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Envy and jealousy essays
Many people have issues with their past and their past will come back without them knowing. This issue is what happens in the stories “The Jack Randa Hotel” and “Cathedral”. A character from both stories get jealous of their significant other being around someone that is from their past. Gail in “The Jack Randa Hotel,” writes letters to her ex husband acting like someone else then eventually, he finds out it was her. The narrator in “Cathedral” ends up becoming friends with the blind man and feels what he has to deal with every day of his life.
One issue that occurs in the story “The Jack Randa Hotel” by Alice Munro is that Gail gets extremely jealous of her ex husband, Will, and his new wife, Sandy. She remembers her life with Will being
…show more content…
so amazing even though they had their ups and downs. Gail decides to get on a plane to go find Will and his new wife in Australia because she has felt lonely since he left her. She misses Will so much that when she was on the plane she imagined herself talking to him like she used to. “So maybe this is the way it will be getting into Heaven,’ Gail imagines herself saying to Will. ‘People will fling flowers on you that you don’t want, and everybody will have headaches and be constipated and then you will have to be sprayed for Earth germs” (Munro 1). The reason she imagined herself talking to Will is because it was an old habit of hers. She always needed to come up with lighthearted things to say to him when she talked. Men made speeches like “I am sorry, but I no longer feel committed to this marriage.” This can reflect Gail and Will’s marriage because they were really y in love with each other until one day, Will decided to leave her. Gail and Will’s mother, Cleata, were both very close to each other and Gail loved the way that their family did things. “This is how really civilized people live. The careless and propriety combined, the response for old books and old dishes” (Munro 2). She misses everything that her and Will used to do so that is why she decided to get on a plane and go to Australia where him and Sandy now live their life together. The first issue that occurs in the story “Cathedral,” is that the narrator gets jealous of his wife’s relationship with a blind man, Robert.
The narrator’s wife knew Robert for a long time because she used to work for him and his wife had died so she was the one who was taking care of him since he was all alone. “I wasn’t enthusiastic about his visit” (Carver 2) said the narrator. The narrator did not like the blind man because he was extremely close with his wife and they were always sending each other tapes in the mail to keep in touch. Since the narrator was not such a big fan of the blind man, he did not understand why it was such a important time when Robert had asked to touch his wife’s face during her last day working with him. She was working with him all summer but he was blind so he did not even know what she looked like so when he touched her face, she wanted to write a poem about it since it was an important time during her summer job helping him. A while after the narrators wife worked with Robert, they ended up communicating again and she sent him a recording of her talking about her recent life. “She loved her husband but she didn’t like it where they lived and she didn’t like it that he was a part of the military-industrial thing” (Carver 2). The narrator was getting jealous of this relationship between the two of them because it seemed to be going better then his and his wife’s relationship. Since the blind man moved into their house for a period of time, …show more content…
the narrator and his wife seemed to be fighting a bunch of times. “You don’t have any friends,’ she said. ‘Period. Besides,’ she said, ‘goddamn it, his wife’s just died! Don’t you understand that? That man’s lost his wife!” (Carver 3). After the narrator’s wife helped the blind man inside, the narrator had said “My wife finally took her eyes off the blind man and looked at me. I had a feeling she didn’t like what she saw. I shrugged” (Carver 5). At that point, the narrator was getting extremely jealous because his wife was making it seem like she liked Robert more than him. Gail decided to make herself look different for when she got to Australia so that Will would not be able to recognize her if they bumped into each other.
She ends up walking past Will and Sandy’s new house and she spots a mailbox then decides to put her hand in it and see if there is anything that she can get that would relate to Will and his new life. A letter comes out and she puts it in her purse. She looks at it then says “It is Will’s own writing on the envelope. Not a letter to Will, then, but a letter from him. A letter he has sent to Ms Catherine Thornaby, 491 Hawtre Street” (Munro 6). Catherine had died so the letter was sent back to Will. Gail then reads the letter and decides that it is fine to write back to him as Ms. Thornaby. The letter Will had sent her the day she died, had said “You do not know me, but I hope that once I have explained myself, we may meet and talk. I believe that I may be a Canadian cousin of yours” (Munro 6). Gail was replying in very rude ways. One reply she gave him was “Did you really expect me, just because I have the same surname as you, to fling open my door and put out the ‘welcome mat’ as I think you say in America and that inevitably includes Canada? You may be looking for another mother here, but that hardly obliges me to be one” (Munro 8). In the next letter that Will send, Gail found out that his mother had died and he went back to Canada for her
funeral. The narrator and the blind man end up becoming friends in the story. When Robert was first introduced to the narrator, he did not like him because he was jealous of the relationship he had with his wife. When the narrator's wife went upstairs to change into her robe, they were sitting there alone so the narrator asked “do you want to smoke some dope with me?” (Carver 7). Robert said he would try some. He ended up doing it a few times until it hit him. When the wife came back downstairs, she said “Robert, I didn’t know you smoked” (Carver 7). She then realized that it was his first time doing it because the narrator asked if he wanted to. They all went to the sofa to sit down and the wife sat in the middle. She ended up dozing off and falling asleep so Robert and the narrator were, then again, left alone. The blind man said “No, I’ll stay up with you, bub. If that’s all right. I’ll stay up until you’re ready to turn in. We have not had a chance to talk. Know what I mean? I feel like me and her monopolized the evening” (Carver 8). He was obviously interested in what the narrator was like since he only knew his wife very well because of their past together. He also wanted to show the narrator that he was not such a bad guy and was not trying to steal his wife away from him. They talked for a long time while sitting on the couch watching TV that the narrator started realize he was not such a bad person. Gail was in her room and the manager knocked on the door and said “I just wanted to tell you I had somebody here asking questions. He asked me about Miss Thornaby and I said, Oh, she’s dead. She’s been dead for some time now. He said, Oh, has she? I said, Yes, she has, and he said, Well, that’s strange” (Munro 11). She ended up getting another letter from Will that reads “It has come to my attention that you are dead. I know that life is strange, but I have never found it quite this strange before. Who are you and what is going on?” (Munro 11). After she gets more letters from Will, she does not leave the apartment for two days because she did not want to fear running into Will on the streets. An old man fell off his bed so the manager went to Gail’s room to ask her for help. They got him to the hospital, but when Gail got back to her apartment room, there was a letter that she was expecting which was saying “Gail. I know it’s you” (Munro 13). She started to freak out when she saw that letter because she did not want to see him. She was going to find a flight to take her back home as soon as possible. Will was knocking on her door before she knew it. “Gail, I know you’re in there! I know you’re on the other side of the door. Gail! Gail! Talk to me, Gail. Answer me. I know you’re there. I can hear you. I can hear your heart beating through the key-hole and your stomach rumbling and your brain jumping up and down. I can smell you through the keyhole. You. Gail” (Munro 14). The three words that Gail kept thinking was “Love—need—forgive. Love—need—forever” (Munro 14). Before Gail got back on a plane to go home, she puts a note, folded up to the size of a spitball, in a box to send to Will. That letter had read “Now it’s up to you to follow me” (Munro 15). The narrator really ended up feeling for the blind man at the end of the story. When they were both sitting on the couch while his wife was asleep beside them, the narrator turned on the TV to a different channel than what they were previously watching. It was a show on cathedrals. The narrator had asked Robert if he knew what a cathedral looked like and he said he did not. Robert wanted him to explain it, but the narrator was having a hard time doing that. The blind man said “Hey, listen to me. Will you do me a favour? I got an idea. Why don’t you find us some heavy paper? And a pen. We’ll do something. We’ll draw one together. Get us a pen and some heavy paper. Go on, bub, get the stuff” (Carver 10). Once he got back with the paper, they both sat down on the carpet and started to draw it. The narrator was drawing and the blind man had his hand over his. The wife had woken up and said “What’s going on? Robert, what are you doing? What’s going on?” (Carver 11). They explained to her what they were doing so she just watched them as they finished up. Robert said “I think that’s it. I think you got it,’ he said.’ Take a look. What do you think?” (Carver 11). The narrator wanted to keep his eyes closed for longer because he was feeling the same thing that Robert feels every day with not being able to see. The blind man kept asking him if he was looking so the narrator then said “It’s really something” (Carver 12). He really understood the way that Robert was living and why his wife was helping him out so much. He also figured out why his wife was so amazed at the little things Robert could do. These two stories both have their past return to them in their life without them knowing. In “The Jack Randa Hotel,” Gail ends up going to Australia to where her husband lives with his new wife, and in “Cathedral,” a blind man that the narrators wife used to help during the summer, goes back to their house since his wife died. Having someones past go back to them can be a scary thought, but sometimes it is something people have to face in their lifetime.
The story introduced us to the narrator with him discussing how a blind man was coming to visit him and his wife. His wife and this blind man seemed to have a strong relationship considering they would send tapes back and forth to one another to keep in touch. The narrator was not keen on the idea of this blind man being company. “I wasn’t enthusiastic about his visit,” he states. In his defense, this reaction would seem normal coming from a husband whose wife is friendly with another man. Facknitz defends my statement by bringing up the time when the narrator’s wife had worked for the blind man and he let her touch his face (par. 17). The wife talking to the narrator says, “She told me he ran his fingers over every part of her face, her nose-even her neck! She never forgot it. She even tried to write a poem about it.” Facknitz mentions, “Clearly he is jealous, and so emphasizes the eroticism of the blind man’s touch,” (par. 18). Even though the narrator may not have many feelings toward people in his life, he suitably is upset with the extent of his wife and the blind man’s relationsh...
The narrator's insensitivity reveals itself early in the story when his wife's blind friend, Robert, comes for a visit after the death of his wife. Almost immediately in the beginning of the story the narrator admits "A blind man in my house was not something I looked forward to." [Carver 2368] He even goes so far as to suggest to his wife that he take the man bowling. He hears the story of Robert's dead wife and can not even imagine " what a pitiful life this woman must have led." [Carver 2370] The narrator is superficial, only recognizing the external part of people and not recognizing the value of a person on the inside.
In Raymond Carver's "Cathedral," the husband's view of blind men is changed when he encounters his wife's long time friend, Robert. His narrow minded views and prejudice thoughts of one stereotype are altered by a single experience he has with Robert. The husband is changed when he thinks he personally sees the blind man's world. Somehow, the blind man breaks through all of the husband's jealousy, incompetence for discernment, and prejudgments in a single moment of understanding.
The husband's view on the world at the start of the story was a narrow one that was based on his ignorance, which prevented him from gaining understanding. His long held misconceptions, especially about blindness, defined his expectations about things he did not understand. For instance, when the husband found out that Robert was coming to stay, he disliked the idea of someone who was blind, let alone someone who he didn't know, coming to visit and the husband's "idea of blindness came from the movies." He saw the blind people as people who "moved slowly and never laughed." This was not the limit of his ignorance as it was further displayed by his constant referral of Robert as "the blind man" and his assumption of Robert's deceased wife being a black person based solely on the name of Beulah. This assumption display his bigotry is not limited to Robert's blindness and that differences that he did not understan...
The narrator also feels intimidated by his wife?s relationship with the blind man. When he is telling of her friendship with Robert h...
Immediately, the narrator stereotypes the couple by saying “they looked unmistakably married” (1). The couple symbolizes a relationship. Because marriage is the deepest human relationship, Brush chose a married couple to underscore her message and strengthen the story. The husband’s words weaken their relationship. When the man rejects his wife’s gift with “punishing…quick, curt, and unkind” (19) words, he is being selfish. Selfishness is a matter of taking, just as love is a matter of giving. He has taken her emotional energy, and she is left “crying quietly and heartbrokenly” (21). Using unkind words, the husband drains his wife of emotional strength and damages their relationship.
To begin with, the narrator husband name is John, who shows male dominance early in the story as he picked the house they stayed in and the room he kept his wife in, even though his wife felt uneasy about the house. He is also her doctor and orders her to do nothing but rest; thinking she is just fine. John is the antagonist because he is trying to control
This theme goes hand in hand with the theme portrayed in Hills Like White Elephants. In the story the narrator, whose name is never mentioned, has something against his wife’s blind friend, Robert, due to the fact that he cannot see. Robert visits the narrator and the narrator’s wife for company. It seems that the narrator had a preconceived idea that all blind people are boring, depressed, stupid, and are barely even human at all based on the fact that they cannot see the world. Robert, although he is blind, is a caring and outgoing person who is extremely close with the narrator’s wife. The fact that Robert is extremely close with the narrator’s wife should be reason enough for the narrator to accept him as a person, but he is a cold and shallow person with no friends. His relationship with his wife is lacking good communication and seems very bland. Robert’s wife recently passed away, but their relationship was deep and they were truly in love with each other. The narrator was blind to how a woman could work with, sleep with, be intimate with, and marry Robert as has he talks about how he felt sorry for her. The narrator is superficial and does not understand true love or
William Faulkner's “A Rose for Emily” and Charlotte Perkins Gilman's “The Yellow Wallpaper” are two short stories which incorporate many similarities, both stories are about the emotional and psychological experiences of two women living in a reclusive environment. The women presented in both of the stories experience moments of insanity, loneliness, feelings of being controlled by others, and of loss of psychological self-control. In both of the stories, each of the women experience similar situations, in a complete different environment, and while one is practically force to refrain for outside stimulation, the other voluntarily avoids them.
The Cathedral of Our Lady of Chartres is a church in Chartres, France. It is about 80 kilometers from Paris, France and is considered one of the best examples of Gothic style architecture. The building was completed by 1220 comprising of an old crypt and a mid-12th-century Royal Portal. The Cathedral was dedicated to King Louis IX on October 24, 1260; however, the building is missing the full set of spires that had been planned.
The reader sees this when the narrator talks about how life must have been for Robert’s wife. He states “It was beyond my understanding. Hearing this, I felt sorry for the blind man for a bit. And then I found myself thinking what a pitiful life this woman must have led. Imagine a woman who could never see herself as she was seen in the eyes of her loved one” (Carver 30). What the narrator did not know is looking with physical vision is not the same as seeing a person. As a human being, we encounter each other every day and never see the real person. The narrator took a look at Robert. Because of blindness he assumes Robert is lacking in his responsibility to his wife. The ironic part is the narrator does not see the lack in his marriage. Robert, who is blind, has more insight than the narrator, and he has a vision. In “Singapore”, the lady is in disgust by the cleaning woman cleaning the ashtrays in the horrid toilet. It is not until she realizes the cleaner is making an honest living. The cleaning woman is in good cheer and never says a word. The cleaning woman’s attitude is surprising to the lady. Both the narrator and the lady’s only concern is how the situation affects them. They both are lacking in self-awareness, and they both reveal they do not know the difference between the art of vision and actual seeing a person’s
After Robert’s wife dies he called the narrator’s wife from his in-laws’. They made arrangements and soon Robert would be on a train. He was going to come for a visit. This is the part where he narrator wasn’t thrilled about a blind man coming to stay. He said, “And his being blind bothered me,” (Carver 305) as well as, “My idea of blindness came from the movies.” (Carver 305) The fact that the narrator relies on the movies for his idea of blindness shows his lack of awareness. This is the main theme within this story.
Robert was judged throughout the story because he was blind. The husband was the main character who discriminated the blind man before even getting to know him as a person. In this story, there are many ways to analyze disability criticism. The four significant ways this story relates to disability criticism is the social aspect, hidden judgment of the wife, physical limitations, and being disabled does not make you less intelligent. At the end of the story after Robert traced the husband drawing of what a cathedral looked liked. In the story when it said ““It’s all right,” he said to her. “Close your eyes now,” the blind man said to me. I did it. I closed them just like he said. “Are they closed?” he said. “Don’t fudge.” “They’re closed,” I said. “Keep them that way,” he said. He said, “Don’t stop now. Draw.” So we kept on with it. His fingers rode my fingers as my hand went over the paper. It was like nothing else in my life up to now. Then he said, “I think that’s it. I think you got it,” he said. “Take a look. What do you think?” But I had my eyes closed. I thought I’d keep them that way for a little longer. I thought it was something I ought to do. “Well?” he said. “Are you looking?” My eyes were still closed. I was in my house. I knew that. But I didn’t feel like I was inside anything. “It’s really something,” I said.” (Carver 113) In this quote is a great example
In 1858 New York City laid down the first cornerstone of Saint Patrick’s Cathedral on 5th Avenue. Opening its doors after only a short 21 years in 1879 Saint Patrick’s Cathedral drew visitors from all over. Paid for by poor immigrants in the city, this cathedral stands towering, proud, and beautiful nearly 158 years later. The foremost theme of this basilica is of the Gothic style. Attention to this specific place of worship is due to the majesty of the building. Choosing this church was not challenging due to the fact that there are of 5 Patrick’s, an Erin, and an Irelyn within my family. Needless to say, my blood is heavily laced with Irish roots. In addition to my own family history, I believe that New York City is one of the utmost remarkable cities in the world. As of 2014, the amount of money that has gone into creating, renovating, and repairing this massive cathedral is beyond 300 million dollars. Yet, currently—since 1911—Saint Patrick’s Cathedral on 5th Avenue, New York City, New York, is 100% debt free. The taxes paid by the immigrants in the 19th century and the donations made since then have been plenty, and generous.
All over the world, people still come to admire the beauty of European cathedrals. Many of the cathedrals are fragile due to age, neglect, pollution, and insufficient funds available to restore these historical and magnificent buildings. Nevertheless, visitors to these architectural masterpieces are fascinated by the design and structure of these churches. The cathedral builders using their own ingenuity, expertise, and limited resources were able to defy the laws of gravity and time. (Icher 30)