Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The relationship between mental illness and crime is significant
Exploring the relationship between mental health and crime
Case study of rape
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Albert DeSalvo was a criminal who lived in Boston, Massachusetts. He is most remembered as the Boston Strangler who was responsible for murdering thirteen women around the Boston area. Although he was not sentenced for the murders, it is imperative to note that he was sentenced for being a serial rapist. His confessions as the Boston Murderer have been subject to debate and disputes since it cannot be ascertained the actual crimes that DeSalvo committed. A psychologist who was involved in the trial of DeSalvo stated that he was suffering from the mental illness known as paranoid schizophrenia. This psychological problem was responsible for making him to loose touch with reality and it has major repercussion on the psychological wellbeing of …show more content…
an individual (Sie, 2011). Psychological Analysis Paranoid schizophrenia is a type of schizophrenia that is most known about around the world. The clinical image of a paranoid schizophrenic is highly characterized by a significantly stable individual with often paranoid delusion that is accompanied by hallucinations. In this way, this psychological condition affects the auditory variety and perceptual disturbances. The disturbances are associated with the element of speech, volition, effect, and catatonic symptoms are not dominant (Tsuang & Winokur, 1974). In this way, the symptoms may include delusions of reference, persecution, jealousy, bodily change, special mission, and exalted birth. An individual may also experience hallucinatory voices that threaten or commands the individual. Other auditory hallucinations may present themselves without the verbal form such as laughing, humming, or whistling (Sie, 2011). To ascertain that DeSalvo was suffering from paranoid schizophrenia, it is imperative to look at the causes of the mental condition. Schizophrenia is caused by three primary causes; biological, social, and psychological. In terms of biological causes, an individual may have inherited the condition from a family member although it has not be clearly identified which particular gene which is responsible for causing schizophrenia. In this respect, it is imperative to look at other aspects such as brain injury, fetal exposure to infection, and brain injury. Social causes include low socioeconomic position, with poor people being susceptible to the condition. However, the most notable cause is psychological cause which defines early living environment and stressful life events as major causes of schizophrenia (Sie, 2011). In relation to DeSalvo, it is imperative to look into his up bringing which plays a critical role in the psychological development of a person. DeSalvo grew up with a role model as a man who did not consider women to be people and as such, he had no regard for women. His role model only used women as a means of fulfilling his personal purposes such as realizing his anger or sexual tension. While growing up, DeSalvo was understandably an angry child. In order to release his anger, he had to emulate his role model, a father who resorted to violence in order to release his anger. At the beginning, it is significant to note that DeSalvo’s means of releasing anger were not harmless at the start and he resorted to such activities as robbery. However, with age and the presentation of opportunities, DeSalvo’s method of releasing anger would perpetuate violence which was directed to the victims that his role model had identified as tools of releasing anger. One manifestation of his paranoid schizophrenic mental state was the need to brag and boast of his various escapades. This is a need to derive security where he was aware that he was not secure. This bragging and boasting was a sign of the insecurities he experienced within different social contexts. He had hallucinations that the society would not accept him for being just DeSalvo and in order to derive some form of acceptability, he had to devise some form of sensational stories that would enable him to cultivate a persona that was irresistible to other. It is noteworthy that his history of having been sold by his father into slavery contributed to this sense of insecurity. This can be attributed to the verity that he felt he was not wanted and acceptable. In his later life, the need to derive some relevance within the society led him to get the delusion that committing crimes would make him noticeable to the society. It is also imperative to note that DeSalvo’s upbringing also played a critical role in his later life outlook. DeSalvo’s voracious sexual demands reflect on his psychological pathology. DeSalvo reenacts the behaviors that his father showed him when he was growing up. Although this may not have been intentional on the part of the father, it is imperative to note that when a child is growing up, he is inclined to take up the behaviors of the role models that he encounters as he grows up beginning with the mother and immediate family members. DeSalvo’s father used to have him watch as he released his sexual tension on prostitutes. His father was an angry man and subsequently with a veracious sexual appetite and this was replicated by DeSalvo. However, due to the paranoid schizophrenia, DeSalvo’s emulation of his father was characterized by more violent and out of control means of releasing his anger and sexual appetite. Another interesting aspect of DeSalvo was that he appeared to be non-threatening, kind, persuasive, likeable, and charming. However, his true identify was a dark man who held no regard of human life, a factor that can be attributed to a persona that is like that of the traditional Jeckyl and Hyde. However, this is in line with the typical serial killer who has to cultivate this outlook of Jerkyl and Hyde in order to be able to influence his victims into thinking that he was not harmful (Zhou et al, 2007). In this respect, it is imperative to note that many serial killers have adopted this personal including the infamous Ted Bundy and the BTK (Dennis Rader). With the absence of the two contrasting personalities, many serial killers would not have the opportunity of committing their murders without arousing suspicion. However, it is these murders that actually drive them and in this way, they have to devise some means of ensuring that they get their kicks but remain appearing as normal people within the society. Paranoid schizophrenia is also manifested when DeSalvo went ahead and started experimenting before engaging in his more sadistic crimes (Warren et al, 1996).
In this regard, it is imperative to note that there was a time he was referred to as the measuring man through some of the crimes he committed. These crimes cannot be said to be as harmful as the crimes that he would later commit. However, these crimes have been identified as tests that he used to gauge how far he would go through manipulating women and getting into their homes. However, the step of committing murders was a gigantic step and it is likely that he was not psychologically prepared. But DeSalvo was insecure from the very beginning and it has been argued that these tests were done in preparation for worse crimes that would come …show more content…
later. As DeSalvo progressed into his crimes, he also gained confidence.
This psychology is highlighted by a pattern that reveals a lot about the killer (Gray et al, 2003). It is revealed that he first learned to manipulate women and gain access into their houses. He then moved on to target older women because he was of the view that these women would not be capable of efficiently defending themselves. He then moved on to include women of all ages as his targets. At this stage, his crimes were highlighted by increasing severity of his attack methods. With all successful attacks, DeSalvo increased his confidence and also derived the delusion that he would not get caught. Subsequently, this behavior psychologically led him to taking higher risk and this ultimately how people of this mental disposition get
caught. However, it is imperative to note that due to the insecurities that were experienced by DeSalvo since his early childhood, he had cultivated the habit of bragging and boasting. This has led many psychologists wondering if it is really possible that there were more than one perpetrator of the Boston Strangler murders. In this respect, it is imperative to note that the fact that there was a pattern involved indicates that there was a serial killer at that particular time period. Since serial killers are known to eventually confess to their crimes, it is possible that DeSalvo was actually the serial killer behind the killings. However, it has not been ascertained whether with the paranoid schizophrenia condition DeSalvo was deluded and hallucinated about his criminal activities. Conclusion Paranoid schizophrenia has been noted to have been a condition that was inherent to Albert DeSalvo. With this state of mind, DeSalvo was delusional and did not differentiate between reality and fantasy. His upbringing worsened his state of mind and this led him to commit crimes that can be said to be very violent and that do not have any form of remorse. In this respect, it is imperative to note that paranoid schizophrenia can be attributed to some violence among some members of the society. Although this condition has been identified as affecting many people with minimal social consequences, it is imperative to note that at some instances, it can have devastating effects on some members of the society and their actions can be very harmful to the entire society.
La Donna Beaty clearly States in her argument, ?What Makes a Serial Killer?? her opinion and different theories on what causes a human being to become a serial killer. Beaty states that there are many serial killers and victims of them, but she is unsure about what causes a person to become a serial killer. Furthermore, she asked many questions, but there was no definite answer. For example, using examples of serial killers including Jeffery Dahmer and Ted Bundy, but only to draw up more questions. However, she wrote many expert opinions too, using them to her advantage in proving her argument, and giving a statement from a respected author and expert on serial killers named Ann Rule (pg315). Rule states that 3,500 to 5,000 people become victims of serial killers. She also states that 350 serial killers are at large in our society (pg315). Additionally, Beaty also presents an early theory that was completely incorrect. This was about how to identify a serial killer by looks. Beaty then gave her expertise by stating that a serial killer could look like or be anything they choose to become. They are most likely to be males and 92 percents are white (pg316). No doubt, that she appeals to logos by providing evidence about general characteristics of serial killers she quotes that in 1911, an Italian criminologist Cesare Lombrosco concluded that ?murderers as a group [are] biologically degenerate [with] bloodshot eyes, aquiline noses, curly black hair, strong jaws, big ears, thin lips, and menacing grins?.
"the shot heard round the world"-Ralph Waldo Emerson concord hymn. No this doesn't mean in 1770 all of the people in the world heard the shot. It means that this incident was known about throughout everywhere in the world. Ralph Waldo Emerson meant to say this to tell the significance behind the shooting and the outcome of the shooting as well. Many people also believed that this was the thing that's started it all. People thought that because of the outrages and protesting caused by the massacre it caused the start of the revolutionary war. The infamous Boston massacre was caused by colonists protesting unfair British actions and defensive British soldiers try to contain the crowd then sparking the revolution.
The events of March 5, 1770 should and have been remembered as momentous and predictable. Perhaps not the night or city specifically, but the state of affairs in Boston, if not throughout The English Colonies, had declined to the point that British troops found themselves frequently assaulted with stones, dirt, and human feces. The opinions and sentiments of either side were certainly not clandestine. Even though two spectators express clear culpability for the opposing side, they do so only in alteration of detail. The particulars of the event unfold the same nonetheless. The happening at the Custom House off King Street was a catastrophic inevitability. Documents from the Boston Massacre trial, which aid us in observing from totally different perceptions. The depositions of witnesses of the event prove to be useful; an English officer Captain Preston and a colonial Robert Goddard give relatively dissimilar details. In spite of these differences, they still both describe the same state of affairs.
The case of whether serial killers are born with the lust to kill or if they are truly victims of their environment has been a hot debated question by both psychologists and the FBI today. A serial killer is traditionally defined as one that kills 3 or more people at different times with “cooling off” periods in between kills. Both psychological abuse as a child and psychological disorders are to blame for the making of a killer. The nature vs. nurture debate is best applied to the mysterious behaviors and cases of serial killers and their upbringing and environment. Nature is the genetic and biological connections a person has, personality traits, and how genetic make-up all relates to a killer. Nurture is examining the upbringing and environment that a person is around that affects what a person becomes. In some cases however, the effects of only upbringing or only biological problems were the reasons certain serial killers committed crimes. Although there is no definitive answer to what plays the bigger role: nature or nurture, they both are contributing factors that make a serial killer. These deviants of society are afflicted with problems in either their upbringing or have psychological disorders, and are able to blend into our everyday lives with no apparent differences, yet they wreck havoc through their unremorseful killings.
Some psychologist believe that if a serial killer displays or kills his victims in such a way then it qualifies as fulfilling as sexual desire. These killers are usually diagnosed with a mental disorder referred to as sexual sadism. Psychologists refer to serial killers who kill in this manner as sexual sadist. A sexual sadist enjoys the ‘suffering or embarrassment of others to the point of arousal’ (Serial Killers and Sexual Sadism). Sociologists believe that a serial killer needs to “fulfil a sexual desire by turning a fantasy into a controllable reality” (Serial Killers: Nature vs. Nurture). Sadist crave the dominance and control over their victims because they feel as if they cannot control other aspects of their life. Another biological factor derives within the DNA of the person. Many killers have the “MAO-A gene (monoamine oxidase A). This gene, which has been the target of considerable research, is also known as the "warrior gene" because it regulates serotonin in the brain. Serotonin affects your mood — think Prozac — and many scientists believe that if you have a certain version of the warrior gene, your brain won't respond to the calming effects of serotonin (A Neuroscientist Uncovers a Dark Secret).” With this gene psychologist and scientist alike believe that this can foretell a serial killer before he becomes a serial
Although tallying just two deaths, Ed Gein is one of America’s most infamous murderers. His notorious killings are remembered as being among the most perverse of any this century. His lunatic atrocities were magnified by the number of victims who fell prey to his sick deeds and who also fueled his numerous habits of cannibalism, necrophilia of women, and his obsession with the female body, especially his mother, Augusta Gein. Although clearly guilty for the acts Gein committed, psychiatrists were confident in their conclusion of his insanity. As is in many cases, Gein’s birth of insanity started in childhood.
The Boston Massacre was a fundamental event at the beginning of the American Revolution. The massacre became part of anti-British propaganda for Boston activists and fed American fears of the English military in both the North and South. The Boston Massacre was the first “battle” in the Revolutionary War. Although it wasn’t until five years after the Boston Massacre that the Revolutionary War officially began, the Boston Massacre was a forecast of the violent storm to come.
Almost every major social, biological, psychological, behavioural influence that has been seriously suggested as playing a role in causing crime has been thoroughly thought of as potentially contributing to the behavior of serial killers (Levin, 2008). The time period and amount of killings fluctuate depending on the individual committing the crime. Usually, the murders happen in different geographical areas. A mass murder has a separate definition than a serial killer, because a serial killer has a “cooling off” period, where mass murders kill several individuals in a single event. Each of a serial killer’s killings temporarily gratifies whatever provokes the killer’s actions, and each subsequent killing terminates a separate sequence of behaviors.
This paper explores three criminological theories as to why Jeffrey Dahmer committed his crimes. Although these approaches vary in terms of defining the cause of crime, one thing is certain, there is no single cause of crime; the crime is rooted in a diversity of causes and takes a variety of forms depending on the situation in which the crimes occur. However, the published articles vary in their definitions and uses of Criminological Theory. Rawlins (2005) suggest that the criminal phenomenon is too complex to be explained by a single theory. Other theories suggest differently and; therefore, have varying explanations. This paper examines the Psychological, Biochemical, and Social Process theories to slightly explain Jeffrey Dahmer’s actions.
As years go on so will the research on serial killers and hopefully we as a society will fully understand them and one day be able to cure whatever inside that makes them have the urge to kill. Works Cited The Electronic Journal of Sociology, published by the University of Guelph, Ontario. http://www.scribd.com/doc/167086215/How-Serial-Killers-Work. According to the article “10 Most Common Traits of Potential Serial Killers By Hestie Barnard Gerber. According to Comrade Chikatilo: The Psychopathology of Russia's Notorious Serial Killer.
Serial killers are defined to “be driven by instinct and desire to kill.” In a study done in 2000, Dr, Richard Davidson says, “people with a large amount of aggression – in particular people who have committed aggressive murders or have a social disorder – have almost no brain activity in the orbital frontal cortex or the anterior cingulated cortex while activity in the amyglade continued perfectly. The orbital frontal cortex and the anterior congulated cortex control emotional impulses while the amyglade controls reactions to fear.” Davidson concludes his research claiming that although environment can and will affect a serial killer’s thoughts, it is a killer’s genetic makeup that inevitably creates murderous thoughts.
Watching this tragic documentary left me with a lot of questions. I can relate this documentary to more than one theory that I have learned in class, but I think the best theory that explains what I saw is the Psychological School of Criminology. This documentary is a vivid picture of how a person’s life can devastate them psychologically and turn them into something deplorable. According to the Psychological School of Criminology crime results from inappropriate conditioned behavior or abnormal, inappropriate or dysfunctional mental processes stemming from the personality. Defective or abnormal mental processes have a variety for causes including a diseased mind, inappropriate learning, or inadequate conditioning, usually in early childhood. This theory best fits with the documentary of Aileen: The life and death of a Serial Killer. All the mental or psychological damage was done to her during her childhood. All that made an impact on her to the point where she has no self-respect.
Serial killers have many frightening facets. The most frightening thing about them is that experts still do not know what makes a human become a serial killer. Many experts believe serial killers become what they are because they have a genetic disposition or brain abnormality while other experts believe that a serial killer is created by childhood abuse; and some other experts believe that it is a combination of both brain abnormalities and abusive childhood experiences that creates a serial killer. A murderer is considered a serial killer when they “murder three or more persons in at least three separate events with a “cooling off period” between kills” (Mitchell and Aamodt 40). When defining a serial killer, their background, genes, and brain are not mentioned; perhaps one day those aspects of the serial killer can be included.
Behavior is sometimes defined as the response of an individual, group, or species to its environment. Parents, girlfriends, sisters, brothers, and peers can all affect a person's behavior. Not everybody necessarily will have the behavior of a serial killer. In this paper, I will attempt to show the difference between the psychopath and the psychotic. Explain how the environment, upbringing, and treatment of serial killers led them to become who they are today.
The nurturing of individuals plays a role in the making of killers, as 94% of serial killers had experienced some form of abuse as children and 42% have suffered severe physical abuse (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2010). A child abuse is a determining factor, in which supports the idea that serial killers and psychopath, are influenced significantly by nurture (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2011). In most cases social, cultural and physiological determinants all play a role in influencing serial killers to grow into a mass murderer. It is important that physiological and social determinants can be identified, so they could be altered for the purpose of preventing the number of crime.