Affirmative Action is Reverse Discrimination

3071 Words7 Pages

Affirmative Action is Reverse Discrimination

Is it possible to fill out a job application, apply for college, or even fill out a simple survey without being asked to provide one’s ethnicity? I often wonder how many people actually look at the information I provide instead of the fact that I happen to be Hispanic. Does that make me any different? It is extremely frustrating to realize that despite the civil rights victories of the twenty-first century, our society is still obsessed with race. Advocates of affirmative action will love to tell the American people that minorities are truly benefited by these policies, and that they are thankful for the compensation of the discrimination of their ancestors. Here is one minority who will tell you very differently. Affirmative action is a process of reverse discrimination, giving me unfair advantages based on my race, disregarding my academic abilities and personal motivation. It is degrading that colleges do not think that I can succeed without my ethnicity being a factor in the admissions process. Affirmative action is in no way beneficial to the minorities today, and history will show how it is slowly turning into a process of reverse discrimination.

During the tumultuous civil rights movement of the 1960’s, President Lyndon Johnson issued a call to action to make up for past discrimination of minorities in American history. This new method of civil rights justice took on the term “affirmative action”. Preceding this was a rise to equality among minorities, mainly African Americans and Hispanics. The breakthrough case Brown v. Board of Education desegregated public schools and opened the door for national equality of all citizens. In 1963 President John Kennedy developed eigh...

... middle of paper ...

...http://www.landmarkcases.org/>

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978) 438 U.S. 265, No. 76-811

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgibin/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=438&invol=265

Schwartz, Michael. “The Ugly Effects of California’s Proposition 209.” Arizona Daily Wildcat. 4 Mar. 1998.http://wildcat.arizona.edu/papers/91/139/05_1_m.html

“Table- UCLA Ethnic Enrollment(State and Non-State Support) (1) Fall 1973

To Fall 2000.” UCLA Office of Academic Planning and Budget, 2000.

UCLA: November 2000.

http://www.apb.ucla.edu/www00/histethn/FTOTETH.PDF

Michigan Engineering. University of Michigan, College of Engineering. 27 Nov. 2004. < http://www.engin.umich.edu/>

Wilson, Pete., Ward Connerly, and Pamela A. Lewis. “Argument in Favor of

Proposition 209.” Homepage. 27 Nov. 2004

http://vote96.ss.ca.gov/Vote96/html/BP/209yesarg.htm

Open Document