Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Tobacco in india essay
Tobacco industries in india essay
Argument in favor of ban on tobacco advertisement by government of india
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Tobacco in india essay
Tobacco Advertising ban in India
Government involvement in personal decisions in life has frequently been a hot button topic. What role does the government have in personal decisions and at what point have they crossed the line of personal liberties? Here we will analyze a case study in India over the implications of government involvement in the advertising of tobacco.
In February 2001, India announced a bill that would ban Tobacco companies from advertising and sponsoring sporting events. This decision was immediately met with dissension. Many believed the government didn’t have moral grounds to make such a decision and that this action held no weight. But was this action even achievable? Would it even have the desired effect and was it even morally ethical?
Many in favor of the ban on advertising cited the implementation of similar legislation in other countries such as France, Finland, and Norway. Supporters claim that the government has an obligation to look after the overall welfare of its citizens such as they do with
…show more content…
Opponents believe that adults have the right to make the decision to consume tobacco and are fully aware of the risks. The freedom to make our own choices is a fundamental component of a free society. When government creeps into our daily lives we are all at risk of losing our freedoms. Manufacturers of tobacco ascertain that if they are allowed to produce and sell tobacco then they should be able to advertise their product as well. After all, advertising is an effective means by which companies can help the consumer differentiate between their products. Opponents of the ban also cite a survey by the Indian Market Research Bureau. In this survey, none of the respondents listed advertising as the reason they started
The tobacco industry seems like a beneficial addition to our economy. It has basically been a socially acceptable business in the past because it brings jobs to our people and tax money to the government to redistribute; but consider the cost of tobacco related treatment, mortality and disability- it exceeds the benefit to the producer by two hundred billion dollars US. (4) Tobacco is a very profitable industry determined to grow despite government loss or public health. Its history has demonstrated how money can blind morals like an addiction that is never satisfied. Past lawsuits were mostly unsuccessful because the juries blamed the smoker even though the definition of criminal negligence fits the industry’s acts perfectly. Some may argue for the industry in the name of free enterprise but since they have had such a clear understanding of the dangers of their product it changes the understanding of their business tactics and motives. The success of the industry has merely been a reflection of its immoral practices. These practices have been observed through its use of the media in regards to children, the tests that used underage smokers, the use of revenue to avoid the law, the use of nicotine manipulation and the suppression of research.
Sloan Wilson did not publish The Man in the Gray Flannel Suit, a classic on 1950's middle-class conformity, until 1955. But, by July 1953, PALL MALL cigarette advertisers appear aware that "society seemed to reward those who lacked rough edges and eschewed eccentricity" (Blum 794). This conclusion seems justified by a TIME magazine advertisement. Here, these promoters apply this conformity principle and other advertising techniques to a specific socioeconomic group. They seek to lure the expanding male, middle-class audience by presenting indecorous fun, an enticing social situation, and smooth smoking delight all stemming from their product.
Tobacco companies should be prevented from using advertising tactics that target teenagers. There has always been controversy as to how tobacco companies should prevent using advertising tactics to target teenagers. As controversial as this is tobacco companies shouldn’t advertise teen smoking. Many teens may be lured to believe cigarette advertising because it has been part of the American Culture for years, magazine ads and the media target young people, and these companies receive a drastic increase financially; however, the advertising by these cigarette companies has disadvantages such as having to campaign against their own company, limiting their cigarette advertising and becoming a controversial dilemma as to encouraging teenagers to smoke. From billboards to newspaper advertisements, cigarette promotions started becoming part of the American Culture.
“One man's gossip may be another man's news, but distinguishing between the two is often the key in determining whether the press is guilty of invasion of privacy.” Whether the article is newsworthy, whether the information is truthful, invasion of someone’s privacy is a tort, a civil wrong. Appropriation of name and likeness is one of the four forms of invasion of privacy that is defined as, one who appropriates to his own use or benefit the name or likeness of another is subject to liability to the other for invasion of his privacy. Like every other tort there are cases that have different forms of a defense, and information that the plaintiff and defendant have to defend to prove civil right from wrong.
The nature of advertising is to sell and persuade, although advertisements are not created to cause any damage, some advertisements can be very harmful to viewers. While most advertisements that possess bad habits like smoking and drinking have been banned, there is still gambling related advertisements being shown. Some of these advertisements include: television advertisements in particular during sport shows and special events like Melbourne Cup Day, computer pop-ups, messages sent to your personal email and phone. This essay will argue that all forms of advertising of gambling should be completely banned because it can be a trigger for people who already gamble and are addicted. This can result in complications in people’s lifestyle, relationships and financial situation. In addition advertisements can be misleading for young adolescents, which in turn can start lifelong addictions.
The government has tried and tried to take away our basic rights, hide stuff from us, and are now trying to ban junk food and fast food commercials? I think junk food commercials should not be banned because the government should not have the power the sensor what we watch. It is discrimination towards the companies that pay to put their product on television but no longer can because they are blamed for the nation’s problems. Finally it would take away jobs.
Many people say alcohol and tobacco ads on television, in magazines, even at convenient stores encourage youth to start these bad habits. Do these ads really target children? Can these ads really influence kids to start drinking or smoking? Advertisements can have some influences on teens, but the alcohol and tobacco companies say it really cannot. Although these ads can seem appealing to kids by making the people look cool doing it, these ads are not aimed toward these teens.
Some believe that companies should have the right to advertise their products, even if they 've proven to be harmful for the consumer. When it comes to a product like cigarettes, there have been many studies about the toxic effects it can have on the user over a long period of time therefore banning advertising for such a product doesn 't seem unreasonable. In 2001, the Indian government proposed a bill that would ban tobacco advertising from sporting and cultural events, with the intention to lessen the appeal to the younger audience. This bill was met with much resistance from the Indian Tobacco Company because less advertising meant less tobacco sales which would hurt the industries bottom line. Also, this showed the government was making an ethical decision and putting the health of it 's people first, because it financially benefitted from taxation on the sale of cigarettes.
A man on the point of death is shown lying on a bed, Aids has taken
Tobacco is used around the world, and its negative health effects are also public knowledge. Since everyone knows that tobacco can seriously harm people who use it, many countries face the ethical dilemma of allowing this harmful substance to be sold, regulated, and smoked. The case study “Ban on Tobacco Ads by the Government of India” addresses some of the effects of an advertising ban on tobacco in India, as well as the conflict of interest that the advertisement prompts. While I do strongly feel that smoking is harmful and dangerous, I do not think that the government should ban advertisements in India, because if they start by banning ads for one substance, they could move on to banning others. Would anyone like to see caffeine or alcohol banned, just because too much of those substances is harmful? I do not think that anyone would support that ban, so I believe that the government should not ban advertisements, while people should be the ones to regulate their own habits. I will return to this point after summarizing main arguments of the article.
Plessis, Pierre D. "Should Alcohol and Cigarette Ads Be Banned." Living Healthy 360. N.p., 2 July 2008. Web. 08 Dec. 2013.
As per a consensus one in every five persons is a smoker, and another one is badly affected by the smoke of the first one. The tobacco industry is surviving because of vested interests of few individual. Besides there is some consideration of millions of people affiliated to this industry worldwide. Anyhow, someone somewhere has to take this harsh decision. Once banned, this industry will mostly be replaced by healthier food industries because a person with a taste of tobacco develops a dislike for dairy products and other healthier
Advertising." Current Issues: Macmillan Social Science Library. Detroit: Gale, 2010. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 4 Dec. 2013.
For these reasons, I do not believe that it is up to the government to ban the advertisements.
Advertising has had a powerful impact on today’s children. From songs, to logos. to characters, advertisers keep in mind their audiences. Competition is the force which causes advertisers to target children. Children are targeted through the catch phrases. animated characters, and toys in these competitive advertisements.