Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Disadvantages of dollarization
Disadvantages of dollarization
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Disadvantages of dollarization
Dollarization is the process in which nations “replace their domestic currencies [with foreign legal tender] …to obtain economic growth and stability” (Rivera-Solis 330). The US dollar is the most common choice of exchange in this practice, though the adoption of other first world states currencies may be entertained as well. Though its affects are not instant, US dollarization has brought many gradual benefits to the economic statuses of several countries. There are two types of dollarization: official and unofficial. In the process of official dollarization, a state gives complete monetary control to a foreign nation, ceding its right to both create a central bank and issue a domestic form of currency. Where as a nation loses its sovereignty …show more content…
By decreasing the purchasing power of money, or rather the amount of goods that can be bought, the economy suffers as consumers begin to withhold their funds. Without the stimulation of purchasing, the economy begins to contract. When El Salvador adopted the US dollar as its legal currency, the nation ceded monetary control to US. This means that the “US Federal Reserve’s policy rate is effectively the… rate in El Salvador” (“Country Reports” 2). Since the official dollarization of El Salvador, inflation has remained “relatively low” (Rivera-Solis 331) which encourages the growth of the economy. The lower inflation is, the more consumers can purchase and take loans from the local banks. All of this activity fosters stable economic conditions. However, despite the progress dollarization has afforded El Salvador, many economists claim that its costs outweigh such …show more content…
Zimbabwe is one of those nations. Over the years many nations have withdrawn their aid from Zimbabwe. Much conflict has arisen between those who send foreign aid and those who believe that the assistance does nothing but further social divide and corruption. The longer conflict lasts in the African nations, the more inclined those who send aid financially are to cease assisting as conditions worsen. The decrease in funding, along with various other factors, has played into Zimbabwe’s recent economic crisis. Hyperinflation has plagued the African state for the last few years, a result of “unaccounted-for expenditures of the Second Congo War and… inflationary policies of the reserve bank” (Noko 346). Dollarization functioned as a highly effective solution to the issues posed in Zimbabwe. Although Zimbabwe is geographically closer to South Africa, the decision was made to use US currency as the new official legal tender rather than the rand. Thus, the “monetary policy… of the US” (Noko 349) became that of Zimbabwe. However, unlike Panama and El Salvador, officials in Zimbabwe did not encourage the phasing out of other nations currency. The circulation of money from other nations allowed a safe guard against any negative effects that might occur in results of the adoption of the US greenback. Though dollarization has brought about a few
Salvador has adopted the dollar, it still isn't enough to pay for simple things such as a pound of
When the first Europeans settled in what would become the United States, the need of a currency to make trade easier rapidly arose. Before the US Dollar as we know it, the American Colonies went through several currency systems. Since most settlers were from the United Kingdom, the colonies were under the authority of the crown, and used the British system of pounds, shilling and pence. The use of Spanish dollars was also very widespread, and the name of the country’s official currency comes from this common practice. While the first trades took place with British or Spanish currency or commodities, the Massachusetts Bay Colony was the first to issue some paper currency, which it denominated in British terms at first, and then in both British and Spanish terms. For the first time in the colonies, a colonial authority delivered a piece of paper, regardless of the Crown’s opinion, which people trusted would be worth money. This was therefore the first fiat currency of the colonies, which would later become the United States of America. In this paper, we will explore the evolution of fiat currency in the United States, and the process that led to the adoption of the US Dollar still in use today. It will cover the period from 1690 to 1863, separated in three parts that correspond to currency evolution: Colonial currency from 1690 to 1775, the Revolution and the first banks from 1775 to 1860, and finally the US Dollar, the Legal Tender Act and the National Banking Act from 1860 onwards.
There is perhaps no other political issue in our contemporary society that is more pertinent, pervasive, and encompassing than a nation’s economy. From the first coins used in Greece and the Asia Minor in the 7th century BCE, to the earliest uses of paper money, history has proven time and time again that the control of a region’s economy is absolutely crucial to maintaining social stability and prosperity. Yet, for over a century scholars have continued to speculate why the United States, one of the world’s strongest and most influential countries, has one of the most unstable economies. Although the causes of this economic instability can be attributed to multiple factors, nearly all economists agree that they have a common ancestor: the Federal Reserve Bank – the official central bank of the United States. Throughout the course of this paper, I will attempt to determine whether or not there is a causal relationship between the Federal Reserve Bank’s monetary policies and the decline of the U.S. economy. I will do this through a brief analysis of the history and role of this institution, in addition to the central banking system in general. In turn, I will argue that the reckless and intentional manipulation of the economy by the Federal Reserve Bank, through inflation and the abolishment of the gold standard, has led to the current economic crisis in the United States.
Unfortunately for the National Government, Congress did not have any power to collect taxes from people in each individual state. The Congress could ask for money, but could not by any mean force states to pay them. The National Government greatly needed money to cover expenses and debts. Congress could not pay the Nation’s debt, which meant they could not provide much needed programs and services for the states. With that issue being addressed, it is obvious the Nation had problems with their currency. With no uniform currency for the Nation, each state came up with their individual currency. Every state’s value of a dollar had differences in what they worth. By printing their own money, the Nation’s currency became practically worthless, while the state’s currency was worth quite a bit.
The impact of the Structural Adjustment Programs imposed by International Financial Intuitions (IFIs) such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund on the developing countries of Africa has led to the destruction of Africa’s social sectors and has handicapped Africa in its fight with poverty, the AIDS pandemic, and keeping children in school.
Mexico’s economy was very unstable and unfair in comparison to the U.S. and Canada’s economic standing. But even though Mexico’s economy was bad, Canada and the U.S. ignored that Mexico wasn’t in any condition to enter as an equal partner (Henderson 121). The overvalued peso in Mexico also caused many problems economically. Since the peso was overvalued for many years, when the peso did float in 1994, it lost 20 percent of its value (Henderson 123). Due to this drastic change to Mexico’s currency, Mexicans were unable to make their payments nor buy goods because the prices rose drastically, which caused many businesses to shut down or lay off their workers (Henderson 123). This was the start of the many problems yet to come because these countries would be trading unequally with Mexico since Mexico didn’t have much to give besides workers who would work for cheap
Just like a corporation issues shares of stock to function as a productive entity, a country has to issue currency in order to fund its operations. This currency is the lifeblood of a nation, creating wealth for its citizens by fostering economic development and providing public infrastructure and services. In a true democracy, the government is owned by the citizens and operated by representatives of the population as a whole, who control and more importantly regulate the issuance of this currency. This is a critical point to remember.
The colon was the official currency of El Salvador from 1892 to 2001, when it adopted the U.S. Dollar. Based on the research carried out in 2010, El Salvador ranked 12th among the Latin American countries in the category of Human Development Index and fourth in Central America and is increasing rapidly when it comes to the industrial sector.
Adam smith wrote in his masterpiece, the wealth of nations, “It is the necessary, though very slow and gradual consequence of a certain propensity in human nature which has in view no such extensive utility; the propensity to truck, barter, and exchange one thing for another”. This propensity in human nature led to the development of currency – a medium of exchange accepted by a community of people. For centuries gold and silver were used around the world as currency; in 1834 the United States, formerly on a bimetallic standard, converted to a gold de facto standard. This policy made it so the dollar was backed by gold at a ratio of $20.67 per ounce. The Gold standard was used until August 15, 1971 when President Richard Nixon announced that the United States would no longer redeem currency for gold. (Bordo, n.d.) Instead a fiat monetary system – currency not backed by gold – would be used. Both systems have their advantages and
Deliberate fixing of the exchange rate or preannounced rates of depreciation below the prevailing rates of inflation, have been adopted in various countries to break inflation. The experience has been almost unif...
The Gold Standard, 1890-1926.” Journal of Global History 3 (2008), 313-335. Eichengreen, Barry. A. Globalizing Capital: A History of the International Monetary System. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996. Galbraith, John.
The theme of this essay outlines two things. One, the key elements of Bretton woods system and second, the characterisation of Bretton woods system by Ruggie as ‘embedded liberalism’, and how far he succeeds in it. The Bretton woods system is widely referred to the international monetary regime, which prevailed from the end of the World War 2 until the early 1970s. After the end of the World War 2, the need of international monetary framework to boost trade and economic; growth and stability, was important. Taking its name from the site of the 1944 conference, attended by all forty-four allied nations; the Bretton Woods system consisted of four key elements. First, to make a system in which each member nation has to fix or peg his currency exchange rate against the gold or U.S. dollar, as the key currency. Secondly, the free exchange of currencies between countries at the established and fixed exchange rate; plus or minus a one-percent margin. Thirdly, to create an institutional forum, so-called International Monetary Fund (IMF), for the international co-operation on money matters: to set up, stabilize, and watch over exchange rates. Fourth, to remove all the existing exchange controls limiting (protectionism) policies by the members, on the use of its currency for international trade. In practice the first scheme, as well as its later development and final demise, were directly dependent on the preferences and policies of its most powerful member, the United States. According to John Gerard Ruggie, 1982, this Bretton woods system of monetary co-operation represented the type of liberalism which characterise “domestic social economic stability along with a liberal trading order.” He referred this system as ‘embed...
...price and devaluation of the domestic currency to bring it back to A from A’ the country has to sell off its Foreign assets.
The first reason is the issue of euro. Considering a strong correlation between money and collective national identity, money can be used as an effective tool in facilitating the integration of diverse identities (Risse, 2003). Actually, the principal goal of the issues of euro is to promote the unification of the monetary system and foster integration of the economy in order to ease economic activities betwee...
Today, couple of monetary forms are completely upheld by gold or silver. Subsequent to most world monetary standards are fiat cash, the cash supply could increment quickly for political reasons, bringing about inflation. The