Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Economy on depression essay
The responses of president franklin roosevelt administration to the problems of the great Depression
Economy on depression essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Economy on depression essay
The ideologies of the Axis Powers were brief excerpts that gave us a small glimpse into the mind and thought processes of Adolf Hitler as well as the fundamental thinking patterns of the Japanese authoritarian regime. The questions that will be addressed in this essay are: From what concrete conditions did the ideas expressed in these documents arise? Why did they achieve such widespread popularity? To what extent might persons even in the Western democracies find such ideas persuasive in the 1930’s? Adolf Hitler’s political goals and social philosophies can be seen vividly through a brief excerpt of his autobiography/exposition entitled “Mein Kampf” or “My Struggles.” Hitler’s thoughts seemed to arise from a mind that blamed the German …show more content…
collapse; economic demise, heavy reparations put on Germany, unemployment, depression, on the “failure to recognize the racial problem and especially the Jewish menace.” (Strayer, 1020) Hitler the nationalist was interested only in preserving the German race. This was thought to be possible by eliminating internal enemies or political parties that resisted a Nazi Germany such as the Communist and Socialist parties, external enemies; mainly the Jews whom he “believed were responsible for the German defeat in the First World War” (Modern World History, 2015) and were on a conspiracy to gain world leadership. The ultimate goal was to create a society that would only include and be under German rule. The racist Hitler argues that the Aryan “Alone was the founder of all higher humanity, therefore representing that prototype of all that we understand by the word man. He is the Prometheus of mankind from whose bright forehead the divine spark of genus has sprung at all times.” (Strayer, 1019) He believed that only the White race should pro-create. “Any crossing of two beings not exactly the same level of the two parents produces a medium between Page 2 the level of the two parents…Such mating is contrary to the will of Nature for a breeding of all life.” Or “All who are not of good race in this world are chaff.” (Strayer, 1019) These thoughts gave way to a belief in survival of the fittest. Only the strong survived and the weak needed to be eliminated to make space for the strong. In the excerpt, paranoid and hate-filled Hitler envisioned what he perceived as a German- only society that eliminated all considered to not be like them; weak, sickly, of lower race and mainly Jewish. He believed that Aryans were in a dominant position in the world, and was trying to call other Aryan elitist to be revolutionaries for the cause. The only means of achieving this was by eliminating the Jews and creating a German-ruled, pure race. Why did this achieve such widespread popularity? At a time when there was The Deep Depression coupled with a spreading resentment over the terms of the Versailles Treaty which crippled Germany territorially, militarily and economically, Hitler exploited Germany’s woes by blaming the politicians and Jews and promised to restore Germany to richer and more prosperous times. “Hitler pledged civil peace, radical economic policies, and the restoration of national pride and unity. His Nazi rhetoric was virulently nationalist and anti-Semitic, while still portraying Jews as responsible for all of Germany’s ills.” (Nazi Germany, 2015) Strong leadership is what the German’s needed in place of a country that was marked by a weakened government and political crisis. Hitler promised this along with a national rebirth. He was appointed chancellor, under the belief that the Nazis could be controlled from within the cabinet. “With the use of intimidation and manipulation the Nazi’s passed laws which did not need to be voted on, eliminated political opposition, banned social Democrats and forced the other parties to disband. Germany was declared a one-party state.” (Nazi Germany, 2015) Anti- against the Jews. Page 3 To what extent might persons even in the Western democracies find such ideas persuasive in the 1930’s?
During the1930’s the Western economy was still in terrible shape from the Great Depression and the Stock Market Crash of 1929. “Evident instability – with cycles of boom and bust, expansion and recession - generated profound anxiety and threatened the livelihood of both industrial workers and those who gained a modest toehold in the middle class. Unemployment soared everywhere, and in both Germany and the United States it reached 30 percent or more by 1932. Vacant factories, soup kitchens, bread lines, shantytowns and beggars came to symbolize the human reality of this economic disaster.” (Strayer, 990) Like Germany, the Western democracies were economically in trouble and looking for stability and recovery. The United States’ response to the Great Depression, under Roosevelt, came in the form of the New Deal “which was an experimental combination of reforms seeking to restart economic growth. In Britain, France and Scandinavia, the Depression energized a democratic socialism that sought greater regulation of the economy and a more equal distribution of wealth, through peaceful means and electoral policies.” (Strayer, 993) The lack and need for restoration was clearly global. Hitler’s promise of civil peace, unity and the restoration of national pride would seem very appealing and very similar to the wants and needs of the Western democracies; but through peaceful means. No one was interested in or could afford setting off a heavily funded war by taking a stand against Hitler. Through a policy of appeasement allowing Hitler to take back land that was ordered dematerialized by the Treaty of Versailles, the British and the French tried to avoid all-out war but to no avail. Hitler continued his conquests eventually having most of Europe under Nazi control. A second war in Europe had
begun. Page 4 The Cardinal Principles of the National Entity of Japan was a brief moral teaching manual that expressed the nationalist Japanese government’s concern about the threats to the essential nature of Japan; mainly their youth. It blamed others, specifically, the “European and American culture, systems, and learning for various ideological and social events that were imported into the present – day Japan. We subjects are intrinsically quite different from the so-called Occidental countries.” (Strayer, 1022) The racist and elite Japanese clearly saw themselves as unique and were in fear of outside influences of Europeans and Americans on their society and its school-aged youth. They would do whatever necessary to maintain control including authoritarian governing with denial of democracy at home while trying to expand its territory with a strong military. This was evidenced by “the Ministry of Education publishing a small volume of the Cardinal Principles that was widely distributed in schools and homes throughout the country in 1937” (Strayer, 1021) The Meiji was an era of time that represented a Japan that moved from being an isolated to a more modern form. “It marked the end of the Japanese system of feudalism, and completely restructured the social, economic, and military reality of life in Japan” (Szczepanski, 2015). The Emperor Meiji was being blamed for allowing the importation of foreign ideologies into the Japanese society too rapidly and not giving it thorough thought. The Cardinal Principle spoke of unity under one ruler while promoting militarism. They promoted an entire country that served one Emperor with a strong military that represented the strength of the nation. The people of Japan were embracing a new modernization that brought “economic growth, dignity of the individual, free expression of ideas, greater gender equality, educational expansion, cabinets led by leaders of the major parties with the emergence of a two-party system.” (Strayer, 1000) The Cardinal Principle represented elitist –thinkers who
]Haffner, is a book which is hard to define. Only 165 pages long, Haffner has crammed more relevant information into this book than many twice its length. He observes Hitler's roller coaster ride through life and the country that he eventually took along. From Hitler's private life to the complete betrayal of Germany, Haffner evaluates the conditions and impetus for Hitler's accomplishments and failures. These include not only Hitler's psyche, but also the political arena of post World War I Europe.
In the late 1930s complaisant European nations were lulled into the jaws of the very dangerous “victim/slave mentality.” Weak democracies tried placating and accommodating the tyrannical proponents of the Communist, Socialist and Fascist ideologies and Europe soon found itself in jeopardy with maniacs like Stalin, Hitler and Mussolini threatening the existence of taken-for-granted freedom and human rights. Thanks to the intervention of the United States Hitler and Mussolini were defeated (despite incredible adversity) and Europe was salvaged from the scourge of Fascism. But Nazi Fascism did not go away meekly. Its defeat required intensive struggle, sacrifice and perseverance with over 50 million military and civilian deaths occurring during the widespread devastation.
Hitler's Aims and Actions as the Cause of World War II When considering the reasons for the outbreak of war in 1939 it is easy to place the entire blame on Hitler’s aggressive foreign policy in the late 1930s. One British historian, writing a few years after the end of the war, claimed that ‘the Second World War was Hitler’s personal war, in that he intended it, he prepared for it, he chose the moment for launching it.’ In this assignment it is my intention to show that Hitler’s foreign policy was a major factor in causing the conflict but that other reasons, both long term and short term, need to be recognised as well. Probably the first factor that need considering is the Treaty of Versailles, of 1919.
Gesink, Indira. "Fascism, Nazism and Road to WWII." World Civilizations II. Baldwin Wallace University. Marting Hall, Berea. 3 April 2014. Class lecture.
The reason for this paper was to understand more about why he was doing what he was doing and how it affected the people in Germany and everywhere else. Why he became the person he was and why he did that. Adolf Hitler had a very difficult childhood and did not have a good relationship with his dad. He had many losses in his life. For the years that he was homeless in Vienna it was at this time where he developed his hatred for jews and started going to meetings about that and started to believe that jew where the cause of everything has happened around the Germany. During the World War I time he wanted to sign up and be in army. But instead he was just and a messenger for the World I. After the world war I he was still working for the military. He was in parties and wanted to seize most of Munich. He was also arrested. That he also ran for president and had he was elected. This topic Adolf Hitler impacts the Holocaust and World War II is that he was the start of it and that if he was not like he was he would have not had World War II. That is the biggest and impact that he had on World War II. What the reader should have taken away from this paper is why Hitler did what he did and why he became the way he did. Also what the reader should take away is that the problems he had when he was littler and the problems he had when he was on his own. How he dealt with all these problems and why he was doing what he was doing. And why he developed his hate for jews and how that happened. That is what the reader should take away from this
Historians are often divided into categories in regard to dealing with Nazi Germany foreign policy and its relation to Hitler: 'intentionalist', and 'structuralist'. The intentionalist interpretation focuses on Hitler's own steerage of Nazi foreign policy in accordance with a clear, concise 'programme' planned long in advance. The 'structuralist' approach puts forth the idea that Hitler seized opportunities as they came, radicalizing the foreign policies of the Nazi regime in response. Structuralists reject the idea of a specific Hitlerian ideological 'programme', and instead argue for an emphasis on expansion no clear aims or objectives, and radicalized with the dynamism of the Nazi movement. With Nazi ideology and circumstances in Germany after World War I influencing Nazi foreign policy, the general goals this foreign policy prescribed to included revision of Versailles, the attainment of Lebensraum, or 'living space', and German racial domination. These foreign policy goals are seen through an examination of the actions the Nazi government took in response to events as they happened while in power, and also through Hitler's own ideology expressed in his writings such as Mein Kempf. This synthesis of ideology and social structure in Germany as the determinants of foreign policy therefore can be most appropriately approached by attributing Nazi foreign policy to a combination as both 'intentionalist' and 'structuralist' aims. Nazi foreign policy radicalized with their successes and was affected by Hitler pragmatically seizing opportunities to increase Nazi power, but also was based on early a consistent ideological programme espoused by Hitler from early on.
German foreign policy during the Third Reich is a great source of great debate. Many historians agree that Hitler did make the big decisions of foreign policy after 1933. However, the disagreement occurs when discussing the extent which the foreign policy was derived from Hitler’s own “ideological pre-possessions and programme” (356). According to the structuralists, the foreign policy emphasized expansion and contained unclear and unspecific aims. This was due to the “uncontrollable dynamism and radicalizing momentum of the Nazi movement and governmental system” (353). Hitler’s foreign policy stressed his image and ideological fixations, not his direct intervention and initiative. Hitler is seen as an opportunist who makes spur-of-the-moment decisions, rather than a man with a concrete plan (354).
In the year 1929 their was a large depression in the country of Germany. This depression was made up of power struggle and economic distress. The people of Germany no longer trusted the democratic government that they once knew. This allowed Adolf Hitler, the great speaker that he was, to persuade the German people to bring him and his Nazi party into power. Adolf Hitler approached the German people speaking of nationalism which was very much needed after World War I. Not only did he need the...
Support for the Nazi party was due to the growing belief that it was a
Surprisingly, Hitler came to power legally through the success of his book Mein Kampt (My Struggle) which he wrote in prison. In this book, Hitler uttered his dream of a new nation, a nation which consists of a pure “Aryan” ra...
As a result of Germany’s strong leaders, the country was able to take the world by storm and make it to the top. In 1938, TIME Magazine named Adolf Hitler their Man of the Year, declaring that “Herr Hitler reaped on that day at Munich the harvest of an audacious, defiant, ruthless foreign policy he had pursued for five and a half years.” It is to be understood by TIME’s perspective that Hitler was on top of the world; practically unstoppable. His unique foreign policy pushed the reversal of the Treaty of Versailles, the unity of everyone who spoke German, and the reinstatement of all lost German territories. As a result of Adolf Hitler acting upon his policy, “he had torn the Treaty of Versailles to shreds. He had rearmed Germany to the teeth— or as close to the teeth as he was able. He had stolen Austria before the eyes of a horrified and apparently impotent world” (TIME). Hitler had completely achieved the goals of his foreign policy. In addition, h...
Adolf Hitler (the Führer or leader of the Nazi party) “believed that a person's characteristics, attitudes, abilities, and behavior were determined by his or her so-called racial make-up.” He thought that those “inherited characteristics (did not only affect) outward appearance and physical structure”, but also determined a person’s physical, emotional/social, and mental state. Besides these ideas, the Nazi’s believed tha...
During the Twentieth-Century, there were several dramatic economic changes and events. Going from being a complete agricultural nation to being an industrial super, enduring a great depression, having a civil rights movement and so many more, the 20th Century carries the names of some of the world’s most important events. Although history has flourished with all of its game changers, the solute most important event of the 1900’s was World War 2. The second world war, just decades after the first, “was the most widespread and deadliest war in history, involving more than 300 countries and resulting in more than 50 million military and civilian dead,” according to History.com. After World War I had ended, the peace settlement known as the Treaty of Versailles, created in 1919, had a purpose of obligating Germany to relinquish territories to Belgium, Czechoslovakia, and Poland. However these new territories were very susceptible to aggression from its neighboring countries, Germany and the Soviet Union. During this time there was still a great deal of tension between the countries/ territories. Italy and Japan viewed the treaty as a failure to acknowledge the status of the two’s world powers. Also Germans saw that rather than being defeated at the close of World War I, they were betrayed. With the economy being exceptionally deprived and a great deal of political instability, this set the stage for dictatorships that according to Twentieth-Century America “offered territorial expansion by military conquest as a way to redress old rivalries, dominate trade and gain access to raw materials”. Countries such as Japan began making use of propaganda’s stressing that Japans “greatness” must be reassured. Italy’s Fascist dictator, Benito Mus...
* Saarland was under LN control and after 15 years the people could vote if they wanted to belong to Germany or France
“Adolf Hitler became Chancellor of Germany in January of 1933” and assumed both the powers of president and chancellor in August of 1934. He was a very ruthless and determined leader. Finding fault was a strength of Hitler’s and finding it in Western societies was no different.