Acute Pain Case Study

1098 Words3 Pages

4. Compare your client’s situation to the theory. What parts were useful in thinking through your client’s situation? What parts of the theory did you actually use during your care, even though you weren’t acquainted with it while you were working with that client?
The middle-range theory of acute pain applies to this situation in several different ways. This particular situation would require a multimodal approach by the nurse and health care providers in order to provide the patient with the pain medication as well as teaching about nonpharmacological methods to aid in relieving the pain. This was evident in the care of JH, when I explained to her the type of analgesic medication she was receiving. She seemed not to be listening at this point due to her past knowledge of this medication in previous hospitalizations.
I promised JH that I would provide attentive care for her pain management, reassessing her pain thirty minutes after administration and every two hours to see if she required another dosage. This was crucial in order to assure the pain relief methods were adequate and to re-intervene if they were not. I think that this aspect of attentive care in the theory was useful in thinking through her care especially with her past of not having adequate pain relief. Before administration I asked for her to rate her pain on a scale of 0-10, …show more content…

A large aspect that may have helped this case is if we had asked her what has previously worked to get her pain to her desired goal. This would have helped us create a better plan of care to help achieve her goal. We acknowledged the fact that the pain she was experiencing after administration may be the least amount she could have felt with her condition. Because the syndrome has so many unanswered questions, it is impossible to know whether the relief of all pain is even possible, or a goal of a 2 on a 0-10 scale is

Open Document