Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Activity based costing AN INTRODUCTION
Activity based costing AN INTRODUCTION
Features of activity based costing
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Activity based costing AN INTRODUCTION
One of the basic parts of cost accounting is to gauge the cost of tangible or intangible product or service. All costing models are attempting to discover the "correct" cost 1.e actual cost without any cost variances for all cost objects, for example, product, profit, segment, and division. costing methodologies all over the world apportion overhead by utilizing volume- driven measure, for example, unit transformed to first gauge a foreordained overhead rate then assign overhead by applying this normal overhead rate to the cost object. Requisition of such models is authentic for offices generating goods with less differing qualities. In any case, as manufactured goods differ, the wide averaging methodology prompts severe cost variations (Johnson and Kaplan, 1987, Cooper and Kaplan, 1988).
A more refined overhead allocation system, for example, Activity Based Costing (ABC) plans to lessen these cost estimation mutilations by making various cost pools and allocation bases to apportion overhead to item or administration in two stages allocation procedure. One issue that identifies with the ABC framelabor is that the allocation methodology accepts a strict relative relationship between activity and cost. Noreen and Soderstrom (1994) test this straight corresponding suspicion by looking at the healing center's opportunity arrangement conduct of overhead costs and exercises. The effects demonstrate that the proportionality speculation might be rejected for the majority of the overhead records. On normal over the accounts, the normal cost for every unit of activity exaggerates marginal cost by in the ballpark of 40% and in some branches by over 100%. An alternate study directed by Noreen and Soderstrom (1997) prescribes that costing f...
... middle of paper ...
... H"" edition, McGraw-Hill Irwin. New York, NY
McNair, C. J. (2007). Beyond the boundaries: Future trends in cost management. Cost Management, 21(1), p.10-21.
Homgren, C, Datar, S. & Foster, G (2012). Cost Accounting- A Managerial Emphasis, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Johnson, H. & Kaplan, R (1987). Relevance Lost: the Rise and fall of Management Accounting, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
Cooper, R. & Kaplan, R (1988). "Measure Costs Right: Make the Right Decisions," Harvard Business Review, Sept-Oct, p.96-103
Noreen, E. & Soderstrom, N. (1994) "Are Overhead costs Strictly Proportional to Activity?" Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol.17 (1), p.255-278
Kim, K. & Hon, I (2008). "Application of a hybrid genetic algorithm and neural netlabor approach in activity-based costing," Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 24(1), January, p.73-77
Overhead based on direct labor includes the cost of the Product Development Support Center, interest expenses, and general and administrative expenses. The Product Development Support Center failed to account for hours spent on each product, which will not only complicate the product cost calculations, but also the calculation of capitalization expenses later on. The Development Support Center will be most used during the peak (i.e. most hours) time of development for each product, and hours worked will probably be the best way to divvy up the costs of the support center. The money invested in the company is being used on developing each product right now. I figured interest would best be divvied up by hours to attribute the interest expense to the product using the most of the investment. Similar to the reasons stated before general and administrative costs are going to be associated with the most prominent product, and that is best seen through hours. (Figure A)
Reimers, Jane L. (2003). Financial Accounting A Business Process Application. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
The presentation of the material is in dollars only. Overhead is applied to products as a percent of direct labor dollar cost. Factory profit for each year is found by subtracting direct material, direct labor, and direct overhead costs from total sales. The overhead percentage is calculated at the same time budgeting and is applied as a single overhead pool throughout each model year. The consulting company used 435% of direct labor costs in 1987 for their study; the budgeted was actually 437% (OH/DL=107,954/24,682). A similar percentage applies in the following year (109890/25294=434.5%). However in the next two years, after the outsourcing of oil pans and mufflers was enacted, the allocation of overhead in...
Marshall, M.H., McManus, W.W., Viele, V.F. (2003). Accounting: What the Numbers Mean. 6th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
[5] Colin Drury, Management and Costing Accounting, (7th edition), Chapter 17, Standard costing and variance analysis, p. 425-436
Treating overhead costs as "fixed" can cause an unfair and highly misleading distribution of overhead costs which are in fact variable.
Marshall, D. H., McManus, W. W, & Viele, D. (2002). Accounting: What the Numbers Mean. 5th ed. San Francisco: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
"College Accounting Coach." Process Costing-Definitions And Features(Part1) « Process Costing « Cost Accounting «. Feb. 2007. Web
Rishinek, A., 1983. Control Aspects of Standard Costing: Variance Analysis, Inflation Adjustment, The Learning Curve and their Computer Applications. Managerial Finance, 9(1), pp. 14-18.
Activity-based costing is used as a supplement of traditional cost accounting in a company to support manager in internal decision making. It focus on assigning the indirect cost to direct costs in order to get a more accurate cost on products. Activity-based costing uses several cost pools instead of one in traditional cost accounting. The system is easy to implement and it provides many benefits, it allows the company to respond to inefficiency by reallocating resources to more profitable activity from areas that absorb too many resources. It also allows the company to respond to manufacturing overhead cost and assumes a more accurate selling price on products in order to make more profits. Company that do not have internal expertise to conduct activity-based costing analysis may think to hire one or ask company that provides this kind of services for help.
Activity-Based Costing ( ABC ) Summary The business environment in the 1990s is markedly different from that of the past when conventional cost accounting procedures were established. Activity-based costing (ABC), pioneered in the late 1980s, offered a new costing approach consistent with the changed environment. However, ABC did not diffuse rapidly into the business community.
Therefore, adopting an activity base costing (ABC) system will help managers with many of these issues. Although an ABC system mainly identify costing of products and services, it is also capable of assigning costs to other resources. Furthermore, the approach identifies indirect costs in more details and take other activities into consideration when loading costs (Apak et al, 2012). Yaya (2011) added that while periodic financial statement reporting is based on cost of resources provided, an ABC system also includes cost information about the resources used. The importance of adopting an ABC system at ACME, would be during times when interested consumers wanting modified vehicles for their use. The ABC system can then apply the cost to modifying an original vehicle to specifications of the customer. While an ABC system is beneficial for most manufacturing firms, the system does have some advantages and disadvantages that managers should take into consideration (Blocher et al,
One and only reason why ABC provides more correct product cost information is that old-style costing systems frequently allocate all overhead, including batch-level, product-level, and facility-level overhead, using an allocation base that is appropriate only for unit-level costs.
The overall purpose of cost accounting is to advise top administration and the management team on the most suitable and cost effective methods and actions to employ based on cost, capability and efficiencies of a given product or service. It can be defined as the method where all the expenditures used during execution of business activities are gathered, categorized, examined and noted down (Horngren & Srikant, 2000). Once these numbers are gathered and recorded the information is used to determine a selling price and/or to identify possible investment opportunities. Although the principal aim or function of cost accounting is to help the business administration with their decision making and business planning process, the cost accounting data
Cost control and management. The study also identifies several other advantages of using the ABC