Act 3 Scene 1 Macbeth Essay

594 Words2 Pages

Good morning, Mr. Chairman and fellow students. The topic for our debate is that “The story of a bad man who commits a crime is not a tragedy, but a straightforward tale of evil”. Macbeth, however, is about a good man who becomes evil, and that is his tragedy”. We, the negative team, believe that this statement is false. Today, I will be arguing that after Macbeth killed King Duncan, he was no longer considered the hero, and without a hero, this could no longer be a tragedy. First Point My first point is that by Act 2 Macbeth is no longer a hero after killing king Duncan.For example during Act 3 Scene 1 Macbeth is crowned king and invites Banquo, a dear friend of his to his coronation feast.However to the readers horror Macbeth intends to have Banquo and his son Flance killed, saying to his assassins “He’s my enemy too, And I hate him so much that every minute he’s alive it eats away at my …show more content…

I have no reason to fear him. But even so, I'll make doubly sure. I'll guarantee my own fate by having you killed, Macduff.That way I can conquer my own fear and sleep easy at night.”These words are clearly not from a hero but more like words Second Point My second point is that without a hero the story of Macbeth can no longer be called a tragedy.For instance the absence of a standard hero significantly changes the dynamics of a tragedy. Unlike other traditional tragic stories where the protagonist's flaws lead to their downfall, Shakespeare's play unfolds without a clear hero. As Macbeth descends into darkness driven via unchecked ambition, thereby blurring the lines between him being a hero and him being a villain. For example, in Act 5 scene 5 upon hearing of Lady Macbeth's death, Macbeth delivers his renowned soliloquy starting

More about Act 3 Scene 1 Macbeth Essay

Open Document