Achilles And Hopeless Retrieval: A Jungian Analysis

2001 Words5 Pages

The Trickster versus Achilles and Hopeless Retrieval: a Jungian Analysis of Baldr’s Murder The Swiss physician and psychiatrist, Carl Gustav Jung, lived from 1875 to 1961. Jung corresponded frequently with Sigmund Freud and based much of his early work upon Freud's ideas. However, Jung’s theories diverged from Freud’s ideas in 1913 and pioneered into a new field called analytical psychology (Young-Eisendrath). His work in psychology has led him to become referred to as the “Darwin of the Mind” (Ritvo). Jung believed in a collective unconscious, which he defined as an inherited knowledge shared by all humans in their subconscious. Jung’s work in analytical psychology extensively analyzed myth’s roles in psychology. Jung believed that the …show more content…

In particular, critics compared him with Sigmund Freud. He collaborated with Freud as he developed his theory of analytical psychology and utilized many of Freud’s teachings. However, Jung’s disagreement with Freud’s theory caused their theories to split in 1913. The schism caused critics to juxtapose their theories. Freud’s theories proposed concepts based upon psychosexual development. He focused on and critiqued for his “excessive attachment to the world of childhood”(Segal 103). On the contrary, Jung’s critics believed that Jung veered too far from development (Ibid). He does not analyze development as he focused on archetypal expression. Jung proposed that myths expressed psychological archetypes, which addressed what Freud’s critics disliked about Freud’s theory. I agree with elements of both theories, but agree with critics who state that they have different applications. Both theories stem from different parts of psychological development that are necessary to understand a character: the then and the now. Freud’s theories have issues as not all characters have a back-story to analyze; for example Sauron in The Lord of the Rings. Yet Jung's ignoring a character’s childhood leads to a shallow understanding of a psyche. For example, if I did not know that Cinderella’s dad passed away, I would not fully comprehend her feelings of isolation when her …show more content…

Loki seems to kill Baldr without any motive other than creating chaos. At first, Baldr and Loki seem like opposite characters; all the gods “praise” Bladr and despise Loki for his “treachery”(33, 38). Loki acts as dichotomy to Baldr: Loki represents chaos, hell, utility, and truth while Baldr represents order, heaven, uselessness, and obscurity, respectively. However, I noticed Sturluson describes both Loki and Bladr as being “beautiful” and having “wisdom” (Sturluson Ibid). Why would these gods, whom at first seem completely different, be

Open Document