Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Joint commission on accreditation healthcare impact
Importance of accreditation in health care organizations
Importance of healthcare accreditation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Joint commission on accreditation healthcare impact
The role of accreditation in the hospital setting. At present, the accreditation is a process of review that health care organizations participate in to display the ability to meet approved criteria and standards of accreditation. Accreditation symbolizes agencies as reliable and upright organizations devoted to ongoing and continuous compliance with the highest standard of quality. Accrediting agency work with the health care experts to generate standards to ensure that quality is maintained through all facets of an organization (Accreditation Commission for Health Care, 2008; Greenfield, Pawsey & Braithwaite, 2010). However, the on-site surveys are conducted, today unannounced, by health care experts. An inclusive review is performed …show more content…
Nevertheless, accreditation is looked upon as one of the key point of references for measuring the quality of an organization. Preparing for accreditation gives the organization an opportunity to identify its strengths and opportunities for improvement, which provides information for management to make decisions regarding operations to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of performance (Accreditation Commission for Health Care, 2008; Greenfield et al., 2012). However, the oversight of health care quality in the United States is accomplished both through professionally based accrediting bodies and federal and state regulatory agencies (O’Leary, 2000; Roberts, Coale & Redman, 1987). Discuss whether or not accreditation is “mandatory.” Accreditation is usually a voluntary program in which trained external peer reviewers evaluate a health care organization’s compliance and compare it with established performance standards (Alkhenizan & Shaw, 2011 & 2012; Shaw, 2004). In many health care systems, approaches to quality assurance are frequently promoted using the …show more content…
Many countries have opted for a voluntary approach to accreditation, therefore setting it apart from licensure (mandatory) and intending it to recognize a higher level of achievement. In any case, there should be close association between the licensing agency and the accreditation body, in order to strengthen compliance with regulatory requirements and better enable sustainability of the accreditation organization (DeSilets, 2013; Hort, Djasri, & Utarini, 2013; International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2006/2007; Mate et al., 2014; Rooney & van Ostenberg, 1999; Shaw, 2004; The Joint Commission, 2012). With this in mind, the accreditation process begins when the application is submitted. It is best to submit an application when confidence in the organizations aptitude to execute can be demonstrate in compliance with the accreditation requirements and appropriate elements of the performance by the time of the on-site survey date (Agarwal, 2010; Mate et al., 2014; The Joint Commission, 2012). After the Joint Commission accepts an organization’s Application for Accreditation and receives the application deposit fee, I would begin
Sidebotham, P. (2012). What do serious case reviews achieve?. British Medical Journal . 97 (3), 189-192.
In the twentieth century the medical field has seen many changes. One way that hospitals and nursing specifically has changed and implemented the changes is by pursuing accreditations, awards, and recognitions. The purpose of this paper is to understand Magnet Status and the change required by hospitals to achieve it.
Government has developed ‘Star Ratings’ system which monitors improvements in accountability measures. The experience of the ‘Star Ratings’ system in respect of service efficiency indicates that it is prudent to act pro-actively rather than re-actively. It is vital to consider that the Government is expecting demonstrable improvements in health services rather than rhetoric alone (Radnor and Lovell, 2003).
The standards of the Joint Commission are a foundation for an objective evaluation process the may help healthcare organizations measure, assess and improve performance. These standards are focused on organizational functions that are key for providing safe high quality care services. The Joint Commission’s standards set goal expectations of reasonable, achievable and surveyable performance of an organization. Only new standards that are relative to patient safety or care quality, have positive impact on healthcare outcomes, and can be accurately measured are added. Input from healthcare professionals, providers, experts, consumers and government agencies develop these standards.
The purpose of this paper is to identify a quality safety issue. I will summarize the impact that this issue has on health care delivery. In addition, I will identify quality improvement strategies. Finally, I will share a plan to effectively implement this quality improvement strategy.
Conditions of Participation was created to ensure all facilities participating in Medicare follow a set of regulations that protect the safety of Medicare recipients. In 1986 revisions were made to reinforce accreditation and certification procedures. Participating hospitals that are accredited by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations or American Osteopathic Association have been deemed to meeting Conditions of Participation requirements on the wellbeing of Medicare Recipients. The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations also requires that the facilities are licensed by their state. (Lohr, 1990, p.
... is an abstract model that proposes an exploratory plan for health services and evaluating quality of health care. In accordance with the model, information about quality of care can be obtained from three categories: structure, process, and outcomes. In addition, not long ago The Joint Commission include outcomes in its accreditation valuations (Sultz, & Young, 2011, p. 378).
In the healthcare system, quality is a major driving compartment for patient outcomes. The quality of care reflects the outcomes in a patient’s care. According to Feeley, Fly, Walters and Burke (2010), “quality equ...
Health care must be fully accountable for quality and the patient experience is simply the patient's perception of quality. Society should question and debate on how healthcare organizations should show improvement for consumers. This can help organizations create reliable health coverage cost and evaluate medical performances for families and individuals in the future. Physicians and organizations are now evaluating patients with collection of electronic data to improve a patient’s...
Quality improvement (QI) involves the regular and constant actions that enable measurable improvement in health care. QI results in enhanced health services, organizational efficiency, quality and safe care to patients, and desired health outcomes for individuals and patient populations (U. S. Department of Health and Human Service, 2011). A successful quality improvement program is patient-centered, a collaboration of teams, and uses data in systems. QI helps to develop a culture of excellence in nursing, identify and prioritize areas of improvement, promote communication and collaboration, collect and analyze data, and encourage continuous evaluation of systems and processes (American Academy
The World Health Organization outlines 6 areas of quality that help shape our definition of what makes quality care. Those areas are; (1) Effective: using evidence bases practice to improve health outcomes based on needs of individuals and communities. (2) Efficient: healthcare that maximizes resources and minimizes waste. (3) Accessible: timely care that is provided in a setting where the skills and resources are appropriate for the medical need and is geographically reasonable. (4) Acceptable/Patient-Centered: healthcare that considers individual needs, preferences, and culture. (5) Equitable: healthcare quality that does not vary because of race, gender, ethnicity, geographical location, or socioeconomically status. (6) Safe: healthcare that minimizes harm and risks to patients. (Bengoa, 2006)
Understanding quality measurement is essential in improving quality. Teams need to be able to understand whether the changes being made are actually leading to improved care and improved outcomes. For data to have an impact on an improvement initiative, providers and staff must understand it, trust it, and use it. Health care organization must understand the measurement of quality provided by the Institute of Medicine (patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, compliance, efficiency, safe, timely, patient centered, and equitable. An organization cannot improve its performance if it does not know how it is performing. Measuring quality improvements is essential as it reflects the quality of care given by the providers and that by comparing performance
...n of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO), and the American Medical Accreditation Program (AMAP), just to name a couple. Each of the accrediting bodies is unique in terms of their mission, activities, compositions of their boards, and organizational histories, and each develops their own accreditation process and programs and sets their own accreditation standards. . "Accreditation of a health care facility or program is a symbol of quality, similar to the Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval that indicates to the public that the organization or program has met certain standards." (Goode, 2001) The accreditation proves that healthcare facility underwent the accreditation process and met all of the necessary requirements to become qualified. Accreditation has been generally viewed as a desirable process to establish standards and work toward achieving higher quality care.
Further, they are the reflection of a desired and achievable performance that helps in the comparison of the actual and the expected level. The objective of the standards for professional is to direct and maintain practices that are safe. In the profession, they promote all the actions undertaken and also provide a mean of assessment. Such ensures efficiency and safety because the health professional comes with checklists for specific things of the employers (O'connell, Gardner & Coyer, 2014). In the health care delivery, the standards act as a guarantee to the accountability of the actions and decisions taken to maintain a high level of competence during patient care and health-related service delivery.
The community, providers and health organizations work together with entrepreneurs to change health care delivery and improve quality care and outcomes regardless of existing constraints brought about through policy, regulation, innovation, and increasing technological demand. Quality in healthcare is the continuing effort to reach and maintain necessary goals and requirements in order to meet standards of care provided by the healthcare facility. Quality in health care leads to accreditation, performance improvement, and high quality evaluation reports that greatly benefit the healthcare institution as a whole. The entrepreneurship process has influenced the delivery of health care services and products. (Feigenbaum,