Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Technology use in criminal investigation
Use of technology in crime investigation
Technology use in criminal investigation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Technology use in criminal investigation
Khaemon Edwards
Professor Larry D. Huff
Class 1301
September 17th 2014
Does the common citizen really need access to all types of technology? Technology, one of many tools which help us decrypt our society, its high tech equipment should not be accessible to everyone. Not everyone will use the technology for their correct reasons. Others will abuse the influence the equipment has within our community. In 2013 a Southlake lawyer was gunned down by three men who used sophisticated technology. These men had surveillance cameras and vehicle tracking devices to speculate their victim. If they had not been able to gather the material it would have been harder or nearly impossible for those murderers to kill him. In a
…show more content…
Even though the equipment should not be dispersed it needs to be accessible those who want to use it for proper reasons. For example, a store clerk needs to monitor his store. The common citizen does not need access to this technology, but those like the store clerk need a way to check in on his store. After all, he cannot attend his store 24/7. Our bodies have limits. This is why we have equipment, to do what our human bodies cannot. There are crucial moments in which we need utilities more technologically advanced to do what our bodies cannot. We need surveillance cameras, gps, and tracking devices to make situations easier on us, but as far as the evidence goes not everyone deserves to use the more advanced set of technology. If everyone did then the murder of the Southlake lawyer would not have happened. Blood being shed, loyalties questioned, and trust diminishing, these are all results of the deeds done by the criminals. Due to the poor misuse of modern day technology a life was taken. By allowing our population access to every piece of technology we have we are opening more opportunities for situations like the Southlake lawyer case to
With the advent of modern technologies, the face of criminal investigations, and indeed daily life, has been irrevocably altered. In addition to locating criminals with ease, authorities now have the ability to monitor potential criminals before they can commit crimes. However, with an increased ability to detect comes an inevitable tradeoff in privacy. To monitor society as a whole is to monitor both the innocent and the guilty.
The topic of technology and our society has become a very controversial subject today. Many people believe that technology is an essential component of our modern world, helping us to improve communication from farther distances as well as giving us easy access to important information. On the other hand, there is the opinion that too much technology is affecting social interactions and our basic development. “Technology…is a queer thing, it brings you great gifts with one hand, and stabs you in the back with the other.” (Carrie Snow.) The CBC Documentary “Are We Digital Dummies” displayed the pros and cons when it comes to modern technology that we use in the western world everyday.
Ever since day one, people have been developing and creating all sorts of new methods and machines to help better everyday life in one way or another. Who can forget the invention of the ever-wondrous telephone? And we can’t forget how innovative and life-changing computers have been. However, while all machines have their positive uses, there can also be many negatives depending on how one uses said machines, wiretapping in on phone conversations, using spyware to quietly survey every keystroke and click one makes, and many other methods of unwanted snooping have arisen. As a result, laws have been made to make sure these negative uses are not taken advantage of by anyone. But because of how often technology changes, how can it be known that the laws made so long ago can still uphold proper justice? With the laws that are in place now, it’s a constant struggle to balance security with privacy. Privacy laws should be revised completely in order to create a better happy medium between security and privacy. A common misconception of most is that a happy medium of privacy and security is impossible to achieve. However, as well-said by Daniel Solove, “Protecting privacy doesn’t need to mean scuttling a security measure. Most people concerned about the privacy implications of government surveillance aren’t arguing for no[sic] surveillance and absolute privacy. They’d be fine giving up some privacy as long as appropriate controls, limitations, oversight and accountability mechanisms were in place.”(“5 Myths about Privacy”)
Recent advancements in technology have had a huge impact on the current criminal justice system. These new developments have made it easier for those in the field to track down criminals and help provide better evidence to support their cases. Things such as fingerprint databases, DNA testing, GPS tracking, and many other things have made it easier for prosecutors or defendants to prove their cases in court. This is very beneficial because with this new wave of technology officials are now able to provide more reliable and credible evidence in court. This current upsurge of technology will help benefit a lot people in the field. People such as law enforcement, falsely accused criminals, prosecutors, defendants, judges, the list just goes on and on. Technology has been has had a major impact on the criminal justice system, it is now been made easier to track down and catch criminals and made it so that the evidence provided at court is more reliable and credible.
Have you ever looked up while in a public place and noticed a camera watching you? While some people may be alarmed, others feel a sense of safety and protection. Electronic surveillance consists of cameras in public places to watch over the city streets or parks. Their purpose is to allow policemen and the state government to know when crime is happening and where in the city. Cameras provide a great advantage of protection over just having police officers patrol the cities. These men and women cannot be everywhere at one time, but the cameras can. Electronic surveillance should be accepted worldwide because it can identify criminals and decrease crime in cities.
Whether technology is with us or hurting us, we still have to use it and it affects our lives daily. We need it to get a hold of someone. We need it to do our jobs. Most importantly, we need it to keep our lives away from harm. There are many ways to manipulate technology, but technology has more good to it than bad. There are those who use it for good, like investigators so they can figure out the real story. Then there are those who use it for bad, just like those who commit cyber bullying along with other minor and major things. We need technology regardless if people argue they like or not. There is no way to stop technology and keeping people from making it better. With the developments in technology, we may be able to enjoy all the pricey luxuries and still enjoy life at the same time.
I think a way we can assist our laws with keeping up with the advancement of technology is to allow police officers to obtain a digital paperless warrant on an official police agency phone. We see technology advancing at an extremely quick rate; we know our laws are barely able to keep up with our general demands, let alone technology. So to receive a digital paperless warrant will give law enforcement an edge on apprehend a criminal when the evidence is time sensitive. Of course there are limitations on the reach police officers will have on using this tech tool. According to our The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects people’s right “to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches
As technology as advanced, so has our society. We are able to accomplish many tasks much easier, faster, and in effective ways. However, if looked at the harmful impact it has had on the society, one can realize that these are severe and really negative. One of the main concerns is privacy rights. Many people want that their information and personal data be kept in secrecy, however with today’s technology, privacy is almost impossible. No matter how hard one tries, information being leaked through technological advancements have become more and more common. With personal information being leaked, one does not know exactly how the information will be used, which validates the statement that privacy rights have been diminishing and should be brought to concern. Many people do not realize that their information is being used by third-parties and to consumer companies. In conclusion, technology has had a significant effect on privacy
Having a network of cameras on every street in the city increases the chances of preventing a crime, along with the ability to capture a criminal on video. Some people argue that the cameras generate an overwhelming amount of evidence to sift through.... ... middle of paper ... ... However, because all this technology is relatively new, there are not really any policies that have been enacted yet.
Technology has opened new encounters and opportunities for the criminal justice system. There are so many new practices of criminal activity, such as computer crimes. There are different types of computer crimes that many people become victims of every day. Computer crime is any crime that involves a computer and a network. The computer may have been used in the commission of a crime, or it may be the target ("Computer Crime: Chapter 2: What Are the Crimes?", n.d.). Crimes such as data diddling, pump and dump, social engineering and spoofing are computer crimes. Even though these crimes are difficult by privacy issues, the new technology has made investigations and prosecutions well organized and effective. Though views are different on the pros and cons of specific technological changes in the criminal justice system, there is an agreement the system has changed affectedly ("Effects of Technology in Criminal Justice | eHow", n.d.).
A lot of the high-tech devices are costly, but they seem to work in states that have a high crime rate. Technology has its positives and negatives but nothing is one hundred percent effective. Some technology is notice by people in the streets and tends to get destroyed before it can even be utilized. With that being said it does not work when crimes are committed in those areas. Finally, so of these technologies may be against a persons’ fourth amendment right.
According to Seaskate INC., (1998), police departments in the 1900’s were only equipped with a nightstick and a handgun. Sometime around the 1920’s the police started to use polygraph tests, fingerprint identification, and the handwriting classification system. The larger population and availability of automobiles made it necessary for police to become more mobile. The police met this need with using cars that were equipped with two-way radios (Seaskate INC., 1998). Recent forms of technology in law enforcement include hardware and software that can be used to gather and preserve computer based evidence. Since computers are increasingly becoming an everyday part of life, law enforcement agencies need to ensure that they match the rate of technology growth in order to catch the criminals that use computers to exploit their
...puter technology are rooted in the general ethical issues that people in society deal with. For example, the ethical issues such as invasion of privacy, theft, and fraud have been around since human beings began interacting with each other. The fact is that elements of these ethical issues are not unique to the computer field or computer technology. These current technologies raise the same ethical dilemmas with conditions that are unique to computer and cyber technology. This explains why we general ethical issue are such as privacy, theft and fraud are reexamined as informational privacy, identity theft and computer fraud in computer technology.
People want the freedom and empowerment to use technology, while being protected against malicious actions. Protection starts with awareness and education, the government needs to begin empirical goals around previous campaign successes. President Obama noted, “The government is bringing about unprecedented transparency and liability for Americans to take part in their democracy.” (Obama, 2009).
Throughout the years, technology has been increasing in both good and bad ways. Technology is now being used to contact people through social media, link people together through group chats, and also spy on people. Although connecting with people instantly on social media is the upside to technology usage, people often tend to share private information that can be used in the wrong way which is the downside of technology. As both technology and crime increases, technology usage is now being increased to help solve crimes. Many years ago, without the usage of technology, many aspects of a crime was not questioned or the resources to uncover certain evidence were both time consuming and/or expensive. The Police Chief Magazine list many technological improvements that have been put in place to