Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Religious considerations in health care
Religious considerations in health care
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Religious considerations in health care
“What is the Senate at UCSF?”
The Academic Senate is vital to the system of shared governance at both UC San Francisco and the University of California system. On every campus or ‘Division’, the Senate has committees. A lot of them. Why? Faculty are busy, and their concerns often interfere with their ability to address the missions of UC and UCSF in regards to teaching, clinical care, and research. The Academic Senate shepherds these faculty concerns from the front line to the administration and back. In other words, through shared governance faculty play a role in guiding how the University is managed.
There is an independent Academic Senate office on each UC campus and at the systemwide level at the UC Office of the President (UCOP) in Oakland.
…show more content…
Joseph Health, a Catholic healthcare organization. As a Catholic healthcare organization, SRMH adheres to the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services (ERDs), which holds to different healthcare governing practices than UCSF. Faculty voiced concern that a collaboration could restrict the quality and range of clinical services provided, and thus requested the Academic Senate’s review of the issue.
The appointed Task Force’s review found that the affiliation would expand UCSF’s service area into Santa Rosa and the administration’s quick decision to collaborate was largely because if UCSF did not expand the affiliation with Santa Rosa, a different healthcare organization would. Furthermore, while the two companies had different governing structures, they aligned on some core values, such as caring for those in impoverished conditions.
The Task Force’s review also found that in the future, changes in any affiliation needed to be better communicated to faculty through the Academic Senate prior to making final decisions. This serves as a prime example of how the administration and the campus can work together to utilize the Academic Senate’s shared governance aspect and make changes within their
…show more content…
The Standing Committees include: Academic Freedom, Academic Personnel, Academic Planning & Budget, Clinical Affairs, Committee on Committees, Courses of Instruction, Educational Policy, Equal Opportunity, Executive Council, Faculty Welfare, Graduate Council, Library & Scholarly Communication, Privilege and Tenure, Research, Rules & Jurisdiction, and Space.
Faculty members must hold a 50% appointment to serve on Senate committees or councils, although a faculty member at any rank or percent time can bring matters to the attention of the Senate and request a review. All five faculty series are eligible to serve on any committee.
Most committees meet monthly and a UCSF Division Meeting, covering key issues, take place twice a year. At meetings, committees hear presentations from groups on campus, and take actions through legislative voting. Majority of meetings follow parliamentary rules of order, using the Alice Sturgis model from “Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure.” Parliamentary procedures are founded upon a rule of the majority, while still respecting the opinions of the
The law making process is a lengthy process. First, a representative must have an idea for a new law and they become the sponsor of this bill. The representative must present to the bill to the Clerk of the House if it is in the house (H.R. Bills), or in the Senate (S Bills). The Government Printing Office, GPO, then prints the bill and distributes it to each representative. The Speaker of the House, for further study, then assigns this bill to a standing committee within the house. The standing committee studies the bill and its contents and has two options, either to release the bill with a recommendation to pass it or lay it aside so it cannot be voted on. If the bill is released, it may be voted on or sent into debate within the house and needs a majority vote for the bill to move onto the Senate. Within the Senate, the bill must go through one of the Senate’s sixteen standing committees, and as with the House of Representatives, the bill is either released or pigeonholed. If it is released, a simple majority passes the bill. The bill takes another step into a conference committee, which is made up of members of the Hou...
There are four different types of congressional committees that serve to review legislation before a vote. The categories are standing, select, conference, and joint. Standing committees are both permanent and bicameral. The standing committee ensures that legislation which falls under a common or reoccurring category will always have a committee assigned to it. Select committees, on the other hand, focus on a specific issue, and are usually only ...
“ … we… need an alternative to winner-take-all majoritarianism… with Nikolas’s help… I call [this] the ‘principle of taking turns.’ [It] does better than simple majority rule… it accommodates the values of self-government, fairness, deliberation, compromise, and consensus that lie at the heart of the democratic ideal” (para.
Baldridge, J.V., Curtis, D.V., Ecker, G.P., & Riley, G.L. (1977). Alternative models of governance in higher education. In G.L. Riley and J.V. Baldridge. Governing academic organization. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing.
What stands out about American universities today? Is it the academic opportunities offered to students, experienced faculty, or strong sense of community? Or...perhaps they have lost their focus. It is not uncommon for universities to focus their efforts and budgets elsewhere; by building state of the art gyms, for example, remodeling luxury dorms, grooming campuses, or creating more management positions. College students and professors alike are subject to the nationally occurring changes in higher level education. Colleges are becoming commercialized and tuition is rising, but is the quality of education improving? In “Why We Should Fear University, Inc.”, Fredrik DeBoer is able to provide a personal take on the issue of corporate domination
Senate Historical Office. “About the Senate Committee System”. Senate.gov, September, 2002. Web. Feb. 25, 2012.
Congressional committees are the part of the iron triangle that puts bills into the legislative process after they work with interest groups. A member of a congressional committee proposes a bill into the committee to be voted on. Members of congressional committees are members of the legislative branch, so when they propose the bill into their committee they work with the other members to get it passed. If one member doesn't like the bill they can try to get the bill maker to change it to his liking so he will vote for it. For example in my congressional committee, the judiciary committee, congressman Mclenan proposed a bill to give tax cuts to banks who approve a certain amount of low income people's loans. We all thought that other people that needed loans might be overlooked just because they were not low income people. We made him make guidelines for that issue, so we could vote for it.
Special rules and new floor procedures have been institutionalized. Although the external political environment of the House is as electrifying as that of the Senate, it is based on a very different body of basic rules. The individualist Senate, a body in which senators aggressively exploited the great Congressional privileges these rules gave them, as she argues, to further their own individual ends. In fact, nowadays, the process of lawmaking in a chamber with non-majoritarian rules and with members so accustomed to exploiting those rules fully is reasonably expected to drag on for months, if not
Contrasts in the lawmaking methodology utilized as a part of the House and Senate reflect the distinctive size of the two chambers and individual terms of its parts. In the House, the dominant part gathering is inflexibly in control, stacking advisory groups with lion 's share party parts, and utilizing principles to seek after enactment supported by its parts. In the Senate, singular parts are better ready to hold up the procedure, which prompts lower similarity costs, however higher exchange costs. The complication of the lawmaking procedure gives rivals different chances to murder a bill, making a solid predisposition for the present state of affairs.
The Society shall also have, as ex-officio members, faculty advisors whose prerogatives shall be to advise the society.
...llnesses. The medical center prides themselves to uphold the mission and vision of University of California has put in place. The strategic plan that UCSF has put in planned has already helped with patient satisfaction, and the increase in clinical and population research. To accomplish all of the goals that UCSF have set for themselves they would need to keep with improving and stabilizing patient care and their relationship with patients `who visit or use the facilities that are offered to them. Parnassus Heights and Mount Zion campuses have achieved over the years much recognition for superb research and for their clinical trials. These are the reason why University of California – San Francisco Medical Center is to be one top 100 hospitals in America. They focus not only the patients that use their facilities but also the community in the area of San Francisco.
middle of paper ... ... committees of both Houses of Congress. There are 16 standing committees in the Senate and 19 in the House of Representatives.
For years, countries have had different legislatures bicameral and unicameral. The features of each legislatures are distinct from one another. It even accounts to various vices and virtues. Both legislatures exist in various countries in the world. The reason to which varies in each place. Legislatures are essential for a society to perform politically well. However, the political structure of every nations varies thus, there exist no simple generalization. The structural arrangements of different legislatures are distinct in relation to their number of chambers available. (Danziger, J. N. (1996))
What legislative professionalism means and what constitutes a professional legislature are difficult questions to answer; therefore, studies of professionalism have employed a variety of measures of the concept (King 2000). In this section, we discuss various measures of legislative professionalism suggested by scholars. In doing so, we point out that their measures are exclusively focused on Western countries with an established democracy and that few studies have given sufficient attention to non-Western countries. Legislative professionalism refers to the extent to which the legislature can “command the full attention of its members, provide them with adequate resources to do their jobs in a manner comparable to other full-time political
If politicians (of any other governmental instrument) act in the same way for a number of years, a convention can arise because of tradition; if the mechanism works, there seems to be little point in changing it. The most important example of a convention derived from tradition is that the monarch acts on ministerial advice. This convention has been apparent since the late 19th century. A more unusual way for a convention to arise is through specific agreement.