Absolutism Vs Constitutionalism Essay

439 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Absolutism vs constitutionalism

The two types of political systems that were seen in early Europe was absolutism and constitutionalism. Absolutism is when the monarch has full uncontested control with no checks and constitutionalism limits the power between authority and government. The monarchs of absolutism claimed they are a chosen vessel of God and are meant to follow God’s will. Constitutionalism limits the government through checks and balances from other groups of authority. Both forms of government have their advantages and disadvantages, which can prove or disprove if they are better than the other.
Absolutist rulers are able to pass whatever they want whenever they want without having to have it approved by another group of authority. These monarchs were able to …show more content…

Within this system there must be a maintained balance of the rights of their subjects and the power of government. England converted to a constitutional monarchy in 1688 where they allowed a monarch but there was a balance with an elected parliament put in place. The monarchs are not allowed full power to prevent rash action from happening but their actions took time because parliament had to be called into session. In 1689 a bill of rights was written that limited the power of the British Monarchs and was accepted by the monarchs at that time. This bill told the rights to their subjects, such as freedom of worship, and made the monarch respect those rights. The advantages of both political systems are also similar to the disadvantages of the other. As constitutionalism can not act quickly absolutionalism is only acted through one mind and can act freely. The disadvantage for absolutism is acting that freely which is the advantage of constitutionalism where the actions are checked before they are put into action. These types of governments have there flaws and as of right now there isn’t a perfect government that balances their power and

Show More
Related

  • The Palace of Versailles and the Absolutism of Louis XIV

    1705 Words  | 4 Pages

    Absolutism describes a form of monarchical power that is unrestrained by all other institutions, such as churches, legislatures, or social elites. To achieve absolutism one must first promote oneself as being powerful and authoritative, then the individual must take control of anyone who might stand in the way of absolute power. The Palace of Versailles helped King Louis XIV fulfill both of those objectives. Versailles used propaganda by promoting Louis with its grandiosity and generous portraits that all exuded a sense of supremacy. Versailles also helped Louis take control of the nobility by providing enough space to keep them under his watchful eye. The Palace of Versailles supported absolutism during King Louis XIV’s reign through propaganda, and control of nobility.

    Read More

  • Absolutism And Democracy

    526 Words  | 2 Pages

    Absolute monarchy (Absolutism), it is a form of monarchy in which a single ruler has supreme authority and it is not restricted by any written laws or customs. An example of absolutism monarchy is French King Louis XIV, Russian Tsar Peter the Great, or English King Henry VIII. Democracy is a system of government by elected representatives or officials. Example of democracy is the United States. These type of government exist in the 17th and 18th century in Europe. So the question is, which type of government was considered the most effective in Europe? In my opinion, I believe that absolutism was the most effective in Europe.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Absolutism And Constitutionalism

    1140 Words  | 3 Pages

    Under an absolutism based government, the people are ruled by a single dictator. A prime example of a government similar to that of absolutism would be the Soviet Union under control by Joseph Stalin. Another example would be Adolf Hitler when he dominated Nazi Germany. Constitutionalism on the other hand is a form of government where checks and balances come into play. There is not a single individual who is able to control the entire government. Sure there are people who have more control than others. However, these people are not able to make decisions that would shake the government to its core. Why? Other members of the government would veto the individual and ultimately, put a complete stop to the disastrous plans that he/she had in store for the government. Another belief of a constitutionalism-based government is that there is a constitution that has been written and put into play. The constitution is similar to that of a rulebook per say. An absolutism-based government would never carry such a thing or even think about it for that matter. As has been noted, absolutism and constitutionalism are completely different from one

    Read More

  • The Rise in Political Power of 17th Century England and France

    530 Words  | 2 Pages

    In England, the parliament because of this need, grew to have power over the king and cause great toleration of people's

    Read More

  • Industrial Revolution and Absolutism

    632 Words  | 2 Pages

    So in conclusion it is clear to see that both systems of government have benefits and drawbacks. Parliament can help a country make better well rounded decisions and also keep a corrupt ruler in check. Absolutism, with the right leader, can help citizens feel more secure give the country a strong image. So in the end it comes down to what the people want and feel comfortable with.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Strengths And Weaknesses

    1389 Words  | 3 Pages

    Who would have more control? They decided that the whole nation had authority. This idea of "Separation of Powers" helped avoid one group having dominance. Sovereignty was to be divided between state and national governments. The delegates created a government with three branches, and idea inspired by the French philosopher Baron de Montesquieu. The Judicial, Executive, and Legislative branches would check and balance each other. The Judicial branch could now protect our rights and the Executive branch could enforce laws. Congress now had the power to create and impose taxes. The delegates also decided that a group of people appointed by each state would choose the leader of the executive branch. Each state received a certain number of votes in proportion to its population, as determined by the census. The framers called this the Electoral College. The delegates also determined how representation in Congress would

    Read More

  • King George I

    878 Words  | 2 Pages

    Due to George’s little interaction with parliament, it further asserted itself with a new coronation of oath, requiring each monarch to swear to obey parliamentary statutes. It established a mandatory term of office for itself, gained tighter control over the budget and army, and produced a Bill of Rights that guaranteed citizens many liberties.

    Read More

  • Articles Of Confederation Pros And Cons

    432 Words  | 1 Pages

    In this unit, we learned about the two types of governments the US Constitution and the Articles of Confederation. We also learned about people views on these two types of government. The United States Constitution created a strong central government using checks and balances. Under the Constitution, there were three branches of government: the executive, legislative and judicial branch ("Branches of Government."). Under the articles of confederation, there was a weak central government with limited powers ("Transcript of Articles of Confederation (1777)."). Both the Articles of Confederation and the US Constitution had many pros and cons. The people in the colonies either had federalist or anti-federalist views. A federalist is a person who

    Read More

  • The End of Absolutism in Europe

    812 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the late 17th and early 18th century, many European nations such as France and Russia were absolute monarchies. Even countries such as England had kings who at least attempted to implement absolutism. Indeed the concept of absolutism, where the monarch is the unquestionably highest authority and absolute ruler of every element in the realm, is certainly appealing to any sovereign. However, this unrestricted power was abused, and by the end of the 18th century, absolutism was gone. Absolutism failed because the monarchs' mistreatment of the population caused the people to revolt against their rule and policies. There are many factors which caused this discontent. For one, there was a great loss of human lives. Louis XIV of France participated in four wars, while Peter of Russia ruthlessly executed anyone who stood against his will. Secondly, monarchs attempted to change religious beliefs. This was notable in England where rulers such as James II desired to convert the Anglican nation into Catholicism. Finally, the burden of taxation was more than the population could support. France was brought into huge foreign debt, English kings constantly attempted to raise money, and Peter of Russia increased taxes by 550 percent. These are some of the key reasons why absolutism failed in Europe.

    Read More

  • Essay On Democracy And Athenian Democracy

    1230 Words  | 3 Pages

    The system of government we have today was starting to developed centuries ago by the Athenians and Romans. Both governments were established with the intent to give power to the people, even though it did not always play out that way in society. The Athenian democracy and the Roman republic were two very different governments in practice, but also maintained similar characteristics in both systems of government.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Absolutism

    615 Words  | 2 Pages

    They both have limitation and a certain amount of power given to the leader. The nature of constitutionalism is based on limitations, and absolutism has minor similarities. Defenders of Absolutism such as Louis XIV, the divine ruler, had supreme power of the absolutist government, but was still limited on the restraint and fear of God based on his rule. With constitutionalism, limitations are there to keep leaders “in line” and can only be in power with the consent of the people. John locke shows us what “counts” and what doesn’t in the second treatise which gives us the limited government. The purpose is also similar because the purpose is still to keep a centralized government however one is just much more limited than the other based on rules and not morals. The biggest similarity is that the leader still has power. Even if it’s a longer process in a constitution, the leaders still have executive power to a certain extent. The purpose is even more similar in the fact that absolutism and constitutionalism are both used to maximize effectiveness, but in different

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Absolutism And Constitutionalism

    693 Words  | 2 Pages

    Both are formed over time based on circumstance and both have advantages and disadvantages. Absolutism will take away the rights of the people, which in western culture especially with a rising middle class tends to create unrest. Despite this, with undefined power to a ruler, it means they can do things quicker than if there was opposition and a constitution to bypass, which means in a way it can be flexible, however it really all depends on the type of government, and the ruler. If the ruler is ignorant or arrogant, it may become extremely less flexible to changing circumstances, which is where the advantages of constitutionalism are shown. Constitutionalism will generally be more stable than absolutism with a few exceptions. The stability is caused by the increased power to the people rather than a ruler and the ruler has defined power and cannot easily defy what the people of the nation want depending on the constitution. Which means the people of that nation will be less likely to revolt against the current ruler if he follows the constitution. However, it can go both ways since if the ruler tries to exceed the power given by the constitution the people would probably be more likely to revolt. Despite this, it is still ends up being more stable most of the

    Read More

  • French Monarchy Vs Absolute Monarchy

    611 Words  | 2 Pages

    In France, the people were oppressed, violated, and disregarded. They were no longer citizens of the state of France, they were simply subjects to the crown. Their absolute monarchy transitioned to that of a tyranny. Sadly, when Parliament lost power in England this exact incident occurred. As discussed previously, Parliament longed for a constitutional monarchy to avoid disaster. But exactly like France, the constitutional monarchy transitioned to an absolute monarchy, and then from that formed a tyranny. Starting at James I and ending at James II, the English monarchy was not what they had long desired for it to be. Many were tyrant rather than kings, and several even dismissed Parliament in order to escape the possibility of them being question and maybe even removed. Obviously, these two countries are more alike than would appear at first

    Read More

  • What Are The Advantages And Disadvantages Of Absolutism

    717 Words  | 2 Pages

    There are many different ways to organize a central government (Melina para 1). A democracy is a form of government where the people have the power to elect the leaders, like in the current United States of America (Melina para 11). A communist government is where one party runs the whole government with a stern hand, like in present day Russia (Melina para 6). Both of these kinds of governments have huge differences in how they operate (Melina para 1). These are main government systems today; however, during the seventeenth century, there was a different kind of government that was enacted (Spielvogel 444). Absolutism was one of the governments during this developing period; absolutism is the type of government where power is in the hand of one king and he rules by divine right (Spielvogel 444). In simplest terms, the king has all the power of the nation resting in his hands (Spielvogel 444). France, during the seventeenth century was seen to be ran by an absolute monarchy (Spielvogel 444).

    Read More

  • What is a State?

    2335 Words  | 5 Pages

    Weber explains that there are three different types of legitimized authority. The first authority that Weber describes is the authority is rooted in the ancient ritual and tradition to conform to the principle authority of forefathers (Weber 1958). This is exemplified in the form of patriarchy and an inherited authority. England is an exceptional example of this because while many European nations had monarchy authority in their history, England still recognizes the royal bloodline and has a monarchy. While the position of the monarchy within the government has changed from commander and chief to the chief of state, England holds onto this authority by which they legitimize their state. The second form of authority, Weber refers to as “gift of grace”. The concept of this authority is that the legitimacy comes from a certainty in a re...

    Read More

More about Absolutism Vs Constitutionalism Essay

Open Document