Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Topic proposal of abortion
Conservation issues on abortion
Looking at abortion through the history lens
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Topic proposal of abortion
Topic: The most restrictive laws regarding abortion are found in Queensland, where there is a very real issue of access. Investigate and assess Queensland’s abortion laws and recommend possible changes to these laws.
1.0 Introduction
In Queensland we have the strictest and restrictive laws for abortion throughout Australia. These laws only let women get an abortion if their mental or physical health is at risk; it is the safest to get an abortion within the first 12 weeks of your pregnancy. It is much harder to get an abortion in Queensland than any other state in Australia this is because our state is backwards compared to the other states in Australia. This is bad for the stakeholders because they cannot even get an abortion if they have been raped and got pregnant from it. Throughout this report the legal issues associated with abortion will be discussed, how it affects stakeholders and the legal outcomes for abortion.
2.0 Investigation
2.1 Legal issues with Abortion
Abortion is the only medical procedure that is contained in
…show more content…
Queensland Abortion laws are much higher and stricter than other states and they should be lowered to 10 years sentence for S224 of the criminal code, 5 years for S225 and S226 should stay the same but include that it should be legal for Rape and Fetal defects to be classed as a reason for an abortion. Considering it really should be the women’s decision if they want to get an abortion. Children are also really expensive to look after on average a child will cost about $200,000 from birth – 17 years old; this would a very scary position if the mother was still in school or lacked a steady income. After investigating into it this far it would be fair to say that the sentences for Abortion should be lowered and add other reasons why they can get an
woman can have. Knowing that if you brought a child into the world and you
For many years in Canada and many other countries abortion has been a topic of debate. In Canada, there has been no legislation regarding abortions since 1988 as the previous laws were said to violate women’s Charter rights under Section 7 which states that Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice. Due to this, the Supreme Court of Canada considered abortion legislation to be a violation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Since then, no legislations regarding abortion has been changed. Joyce Arthur, executive director of the Abortion Rights Coalition
...rvices as a cause of the sexual attitudes, patterns and trends existent in society today. Undoubtedly, a multitude of wider factors are to blame. The extent of availability has also been deemed a weakness due to potential health complications. However, no medical advance or regulation reform can rid a procedure of risk. From looking at the strengths of the approach, it is clear that regulations inflict little disruption on the lives of patients. Most importantly, the British approach to abortion eliminates any desire or need to undergo an unsafe termination. Changing regulations in regards to restrictions of abortions may undermine this strength which may cause the re-emergence of high maternal mortality rates. Therefore, the strengths overpower any of the aforementioned weaknesses. The British approach to the regulation of abortion is in no serious need of reform.
The child could have a serious disorder from something such as the Zika virus and that child or the mother of the child should not be emotionally put through that. I can see the points made by the Pro-live such as abortion is murder, but abortion will most likely stay legalised in most Australian states like it is currently, and it will most likely stay that way. There are variables that could affect her choice. She could be poor, the child could have a birth defect, and so on. Giving her a right to decide whether she should abort the baby it’s entirely her choice. What if the mother was raped or she got pregnant from incest. Would you traumatise this mother with the child of the rapist for 9 months, and would you allow an inbred child that will most likely have a disability and be put through literal
The number of abortions and abortion providers have slowly declined since the 1980’s. The article provides facts about the amount of providers available and the amount of abortions that take place. Therefore, with the amount of abortion providers declining, many women have limited access to this procedure and cannot exert their right to have an abortion.
Abortion is arguably the most controversial topic in all the issues revolving around reproduction. Women of all different races, classes, and religions have been practicing abortion since before the colonial era in America. The laws pertaining to abortion have changed many times, adding and removing discrepancies and stipulations throughout many years, and still to this day. The views of abortion in society during different time periods have also changed and adapted. At the time of Sarah Grosvenor’s decision to abort, the laws pertaining to abortion did not make the act fully illegal. However in years after Grosvenor’s case abortion was outlawed. The law played a minor part in women’s decisions to have an abortion, however society, and gender played the most prominent role in the decision of abortion.
Abortions have created many debates because it relates to ethical, moral, and legal issues throughout the world, because it is legal this topic is going viral. This issue leads to the question of the baby’s rights and the women’s rights. Abortion should NOT be legal anywhere because it not only takes away a human life, but can also affect your mental and emotional health, and it takes away a teenager’s/adult’s accountability.
"National Right to Life | The Nation's Oldest & Largest Pro-life Organization." National Right to
The birth of a child is usually a wonderful and priceless occasion. However, on June 5, 2015, an eleven-year-old girl gave birth to a newborn girl. Approximately a year before she gave birth, her 40-year-old father repeatedly sexually assaulted her. In this case, the unprepared eleven-year-old child decided to have the baby. This is a prime example that illustrates that the right to abortion should always be vested in the woman. Abortion, which has been debated for centuries and will continue to be fought upon for centuries to come, is a hot issue among social, political, and religious entities. This research paper will inform the reader about abortion using scholarly journals to define abortion, specifically when a fetus becomes a human being,
How would you feel if someone decided that you should never get a chance at life? That
In the absence of an agreement determining when life begins, state sovereignty has allowed state legislators the authority to shape a state’s policy on abortion. Thus, what has occurred across the United States is the ability for states to enact legislation which places severe limitations on when and how a pregnancy may be terminated.... ... middle of paper ... ...
Currently, abortion is a crime under New South Wales (NSW) and Queensland statute law. The NSW Crimes Act 1900, section 82 decrees: “Whosoever, being a woman with child, unlawfully administers to herself any drug or noxious thing, or unlawfully uses any instrument or other means, with intent in any such case to procure her miscarriage, shall be liable to imprisonment for ten years.” Section 83 denotes the same, however references doctors rather than pregnant women. Sections 224 and 225 of Queensland’s Criminal Code 1899 echo identical sentiments. Later rulings in Australian courts have set a precedent more liberal than the statute law, however. In NSW, the ‘Levine Ruling’ from R v. Wald decreed that abortion was lawful if “...the accused had an honest belief on reasonable grounds that what they did was necessary to preserve the woman involved from serious danger to their life, or physical or mental health...”. Similarly, Queensland’s ‘Maguire Ruling’ in R v Bayliss and Cullen deferred to Victoria’s ‘Menhennitt Ruling’ in R v Davidson. Justice Menhennitt ruled in Davidson that abortion was lawful if the defendant “...believed on reasonable grounds that the act done by him was (a) necessary to preserve the woman from a serious danger to her life or her physical or mental health (not being merely the normal dangers of pregnancy and childbirth)...”. Despite these rulings, it is still necessary to amend state legislation and remove abortion from the criminal code. Case law (as in Wald, Davidson, and Bayliss) is primarily relied upon by the Australian judiciary. However, it is too flexible and interpretive to exist independently, and thus is counterbalanced by the rigidity of statute law (as in the Crimes Act 1900). Because of this, Australian statute law and case law on abortion must be
Abortion Taking out the trash, or taking a human life? That is what most the argument is with abortion, some believe that abortion is okay because the fetus is not yet a person, and that the fetus will be nothing but trouble. On the other side people believe that even all the way down to the zygote (when sperm meets the egg and earliest stage of pregnancy) there is a human growing in you. A growing boy or girl, with their own little fingers, and toes, their own cute as can be toothless smile, and their functioning organs. To them one day that zygote will turn into someone great, a person just like you and I that needs love just as you and I, a person that deserves to not get taken from our world before it even has a chance to take its first breath.
Abortion has been one of the most talked about topics in society just about anywhere from television, magazines, whether or not it should be the right or wrong thing to do. Abortion is a very sensitive issue to discuss, because of its nature. Many people have said that abortion is a very bad thing to do and it should not even be choice whether or not to abort a living fetus. People think that abortion is committing murder as it is killing the human fetus. However, others feel that a woman should have a voice and have the right to choose to keep the child or not and that it is not murder until the baby is born. Majority of individuals who believe that abortion is bad say that the fetus is human who is partly being formed and to have an abortion is considered to be murder. For the people who think an abortion is ok, say that it’s not considered murder unless the child is born. I believe that abortion should be seen in which the stage the fetus is in. if the fetus is in an early stage of pregnancy it is not considered murder, but if the fetus has already began to develop into a larger fetus then it is indeed considered to be murder. There are times when abortion can be accepted, if the mother is having complications due to pregnancy. For example if the mother is enduring complications in her pregnancy that can harm her, because of the child in that case it is ok to perform an abortion to help save the mother’s life. It is also very important to understand this type of situation. The mother has the right to have an abortion and it is her decision because a mother knows best about her health conditions.
Abortion by definition means the way of ending pregnancy by removing fetus from the womb before it is able to survive independently. Abortion is an extremely debatable issue because while some people are completely against it, others believe that a woman should have the right to choose. Abortion decision is like killing own child or killing an innocent human life before coming out from uterus. I will explain how a human life is being destroyed, the process in which they destroy the fetus, and how to avoid this situation all together I believe that abortion is morally impermissible.