Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Symbolism as a literary tool essay
Significance of symbolism in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In Hemingway’s short story “Hills Like White Elephants”, an interesting relationship between a girl and an American boy was introduced. The story seems to be about their discussion of a particular ‘operation’, or more bluntly, the abortion. There are actually more underlying problems to the discussion than there seem to be. This interesting relationship is depicted by the author’s use of intriguing choice of point of view, setting, and concrete details. It is fair to say that after the story concludes, the girl will decide not to have the abortion and will part with the boy because she will eventually realize how problematic their relationship is and how her way of living contradicts his. Initially, the girl is highly dependent on the boy. At the very beginning, the setting of a bar in a …show more content…
train station in Spain is introduced. The girl’s inability to communicate in Spanish makes her completely dependent on the boy, as well as reflects her incompetence to voice herself. While they are drinking, they obliquely talk about the abortion, which the guy refers to as an “awfully simple operation”, as he tries to downplay the seriousness of it. The guy is very anxious about the abortion— he wants the girl to do it, and he expects everything to be “fine afterwards”. However, the girl is indecisive. She is willing to have the abortion for the guy, as she says that she does not “care about” herself, how she just cares about the guy. The way she talks reflects her immaturity that is not expected from a mature, sophisticated woman, but a girl who is agitated to please the man that she is with. Furthermore, The girl mentions the hills “like white elephants” in their conversation, which she implies to be the unborn child, an unwanted gift that the girl somewhat wants to keep. Later on, the girl matures quite a bit and sees who the guy truly is.
The guy keeps saying that the abortion is “perfectly natural” and “perfectly simple”— he is forcing the girl to have the abortion while he claims that he wouldn't have the girl do it is she “didn't want to”. The guy thinks that the child would anchor him down, which impedes him from living the life that they are leading now— trying one drink after another, changing from one hotel to another, and traveling from places to places. On the other hand, the girl is tired of this unstable lifestyle; she is tired of keeping to“look at things and try new drinks”; she is tired of dealing with all the uncertainties. Moreover, she later on retracts her previous comment on the hills, “they don't really look like white elephants”; by this she implies her wish to keep the unborn child, but the American misses it. The guy thinks that the baby is the “only that bothers” them and he persists the girl to have the operation by saying how he will stay with the girl “all the time” while she does the operation. The girl now realizes how a barely-fixable, problematic relationship it is, and she now knows what to expect from the
guy. Eventually, the girl makes up her mind. Since the girl now knows what she wants, which contradicts with what the guy wants, her mind is made up. As the setting introduces, the story takes place at a train station. This isolated train station is merely a stopping point for them in the journey, so is only a stopping point in her life. Train stations are where people decide where to go next; they are where decisions are made. She has made hers, too. In the last scenes, the girl and the guy drink separately by themselves, which foreshadows their parting. As the girl matures up in the story, she has now transitions into a more independent woman whose opinions would not be altered by the man that she is with. With all the factors considered, it is fair to conclude that she is going to keep the baby as she wishes to, and is going to part with the man who does not realize how questionable their relationship is.
“Hills like White Elephants” by Ernest Hemingway is about a couple, the American and Jig, who contemplate whether or not to have an abortion. The premise of the story seems simple enough, but the outcome is highly debated. Critics argue that the baby was kept by the couple ( Renner ) and others claim the baby was aborted.( Fletcher ) Others have even simplified the story, claiming that the issue was not resolved because the couple was drunk by the end of the story. ( Sipiora ) Although the conclusion is in questions many have agreed with the idea that the couples relationship would be changed and would end prematurely. ( Wyche ) Dialogue is the main technique in conveying this argument but we can only understand the complexity of Hemingway’s work by looking at the story as a whole. By looking at the many symbols, intrinsically and
The communication going on between the man and girl in the story, "Hills Like White Elephants,'; are not an honest one. The man seems to lead the conversation where as the girl is quiet. He brings up the subject of 'operation' which suggested abortion, but never mentions the word 'abortion' in the story to understate it. He tries to convince the girl to get the operation, but the girl seems bothered by this subject. However, he does not stop. Their relationship seems to be fine when the baby has not came in between them. We could see this where the guy says, "We'll be fine afterward. Just like we were before.'; The girl wants the relationship to become as before, but is in a huge dilemma whether to give birth to the baby or not. The man does not want the baby and has the choice of abortion in mind, not thinking of the other problems that would occur through operation such as the girl's health. Later on, the girl makes a melancholy remark that the hills look like white elephants. Probably the hills being a round shape reminded her of the baby. She walks toward the end of the station, and sees the beautiful nature. When she looks more toward the nature, one could see her small desire wanting the baby and thinks what may have been happened if she had the baby. The guy does not pay attention to that remark, because he is just concerned about making his point that he wants the operation done, not considering her side.
In Hemingway’s “Hills like White Elephants” and Wallace’s “Good People,” both of the young females, Jig and Sheri, experience an unplanned pregnancy and must decide whether an abortion is the right choice. While the former story employs dialogue to depict the relationship of an adventurous, carefree couple in the 1920s, the latter uses third person limited point of view to show a faithful young couple whose religion is their source of morality. Thus, Wallace digs much deeper since both religion and love are a factor in Sheri’s ultimate decision. The enigmatic endings of both stories leave us questioning Jig and Sheri’s choice and its impact on the future of their relationship with their respective partners. The text suggests that Jig will not comply with the American’s wish of aborting the baby because of her vision and the indicative dialogue between her and the American, and Sheri will conform to her religious beliefs and carry the child.
In the story Hills like White Elephants, there is an exceptionally heavy theme of alienation in regards to the girl, Jig, and the medical procedure she and the American are going to Madrid in order to have done. Though it is never explicitly stated, the reader can infer that the procedure the two are discussing Jig having done is an abortion; considering that the American says “We’ll be fine afterward. Just like we were before.” (Hemingway) The following dialogue only solidifies this assumption, because the couple continues to talk about how things were perfect before and that this will give them the chance to be happy and worry free again. What really solidifies the nature of the operation is that the man knows many people who have had it done and were so happy afterwards, and that they are leaving home in order to have it done, which shows that there is a certain amount of shame that comes with having the procedure done.
Hemingway also uses immorality as the central idea. The American is trying to convince the girl to abort: ‘“I have known lots of people that have done it…. ‘But if I do it, then it will be nice again if I say things are like white elephants…‘I’ll love it” I just cannot think about it” (596,597). Here one sees how the man manipulates the girl.
Life is a series of crossroads, major and minor, and each decision plays a key part in analysing the character of a person. In “Hills Like White Elephants” Ernest Hemingway tears back the curtains and exposes one of these moments in full ingenuousness. A man and a woman, named Jig, are at an impasse. They have to decide whether or not they are going to abort their child. The man wants no change in his life, and so he wants no child. The woman wants a change in lifestyle, but in order to keep the child she has to break the autonomous lifestyle that has surrounded her for her entire life. She, in essence, must change her identity in order to follow her aspirations. By juxtaposing the character’s perceived identity to the character’s hopes, Hemingway provides the reader with certain axioms of life. These axioms that Hemingway presents fit into the curriculum of Junior Year by relating to specific values and social conventions, by having literary merit and lastly by transcending time by influencing modern society’s media themes and motifs.
‘Hills Like White Elephants’ is a short story authored by Ernest Hemingway about an American and a girl named Jig. In the story, the two are sitting in a train station waiting for the train to Madrid. While they wait, they have an intense ongoing debate on whether or not to abort Jig. At the end of the story, the train is about to arrive and the man carries luggage on the tracks as they prepare to leave. The end of the story does not clearly define the outcome of its decision. She said I feel good at the end of the story - happiness is a central theme of the story, but we wonder if she went through with the operation. The paper discusses the manner in which symbolism has been employed in the story to communicate about an abortion, the couple is considering to go through.
The story "Hills Like White Elephants" is a conversation between a young woman `Jig' and an American man waiting for a train at a station in Spain. The author never names the topic of their discussion but as their dialogue progresses; it becomes evident that Jig is pregnant. The man wants Jig to abort the unborn child but she is unconvinced and wants to become a mother. Hemingway has brilliantly written the story's dialogue which "captures the feel of a private conversation while at the same time communicating the necessary narrative background" (O'Brien 19). At the end of the story, it is unclear as to what decision has been made; however, Hemingway gives the reader several clues regarding what Jig feels, and what she wants to do. Jig's private thoughts are illuminated by Hemingway's description of the setting, the character, and the conflict. Stanley Renner suggests that, as a result of the couple's discussion, "Jig has become able to make a more clear-sighted estimation, and perhaps a better choice, of men" Wyche(59). The couple's inability to communicate effectively their true thoughts and emotions makes their dialogue very appealing. The story examines the gender differences and miscommunications as they influence the decision whether to abort the unborn child or not (Smiley). In his book on Hemingway, published in 1999, Carl P. Eby points out that "[f]or the past two decades, Hemingway criticism has been dominated by a reconsideration of the role of gender in his work" (Bauer 125).
Another issue that is discussed in this story is abortion and two opposing views. When the conversation turns from the hills to the operation one is able to comprehend the mentality of the woman. "Then what will we do afterwards?" (465) shows the woman is concerned about what will occur after the operation. "And if I do it you will be happy and things will be like they were and you will love me" (465). Here, the woman implies she wants the reassurance that he will still be there after the operation, because an abortion places an emotional strain on the on the woman.
In Ernest Hemingway’s “Hills Like White Elephants” the character Jig is submissive to her counterpart The American Man, who is encouraging her to have an abortion. While Jig is not sure what she wants, she does not wish to press the subject of the operation because The American Man is intent upon persuading her to go through with the procedure. Throughout this story Jig’s helplessness, indecisiveness, and her lack of education become apparent, although by the end of the story she becomes confident, decisive, and ultimately takes back control of her decisions and life.
In the short story by Ernest Hemingway, "Hills Like White Elephants," a couple is delayed at a train station en route to Madrid and is observed in conflict over the girl's impending abortion. In his writing, Hemingway does not offer any commentary through a specific character's point of view, nor, in the storytelling, does he offer his explicit opinions on how to feel or think about the issues that emerge. The narrative seems to be purely objective, somewhat like a newspaper or journal article, and in true Hemingway form the story ends abruptly, without the couple's conflict clearly being resolved. The ambiguity of the ending has been a subject of much debate; however, the impact of what is not said in words can be gleaned through the symbolism of their surroundings. Upon examination of the setting, the couple's final choice becomes instantly apparent.
Every writer has different views and perspective which grasps an audience’s attention. Often times these views come from their own experiences and judgments. More specifically, a writer depicting the opposite sex usually has to make an educated interpretation of the differences in views, personalities, traits, and feelings. These judgments differ from artist to artist allowing for literature and feminist criticism to be intriguing. Both, Ernest Hemmingway’s “Hills Like White Elephants” and Kate Chopin’s “The Storm” illustrate the different perspective of the author’s characters from a male and female point of view.
He pays no attention to the outside when the girl mentions “ the two hills look like white elephants”. While the girl seems reluctant to take an abortion, the man tries to persuade her “ I'll go with you and I'll stay with you all the time. They just let the air in and then it's all perfectly natural.” (Hemingway) He claims that their relationship will turn to normal and they will be happy as before if the girl have an abortion. From these dialogue, this American is clearly a man who is powerful in this relationship. He is selfish and egoistic when he mentioned the word “ simple” several times in his talks, such as “I won't worry about that because it's perfectly simple” (Hemingway). Even though he seems to be very emotional in this conversation, he never cares about the girl’s feeling and the potential physical damage on her. We can have a feeling that this man is not honesty towards the girl. In other words, he is fraudulent. From the beginning of the story, this man is thinking about how to persuade the girl to take the action. When he notices the girl talks with hesitation and not willing to have an abortion, he shows his sympathy by saying " I think it's the best thing to do. But I don't want you to do it if you don't really want to." (Hemingway) However, these talks are not convincing because he
An unnamed American man and a woman named Jig are waiting for a train to Barcelona so Jig can get an abortion. While the two are waiting for the train, they go into a bar to have a drink. When they sit down and their waitress comes over to them to take their order, she glares out the window at the white hills for a moment and then proceeds to take their order. The unnamed man and Jig look out at the hills and notice how they are covered from top to bottom in white and the land beneath the hills is barren and brown. Jig said that “they look like white elephants” and the man disagreed. The two got into a deep conversation about the abortion and Jig decided that she wanted to keep the baby. By the end of the discussion, the man had convinced Jig to abort the child.
The conversation between the characters continues and Jigs true feelings about the abortion begin to rise. While the two continue to talk about the future a conversation plays out where The American says, “We can have everything, we can have the whole world, we can go anywhere” and Jig responds to this by saying, “No, we can’t. It isn’t ours anymore. And once they take it away, you never get it back” (Hemingway, 214). The American and Jig are holding one conversation but are talking about two completely different things. When The American speaks of the world, he means it literally. He believes that the two can have the world together, and their problems will be over, after Jig gets the abortion. While Jig on the other hand is referring to something completely