Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
THEORY OF ETHICS Abortion
Ethical dilemma of abortion laws
Ethical dilemma of abortion laws
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: THEORY OF ETHICS Abortion
Abortion is a highly debated biomedical issue in the community. While the theories or moral status lay out the rules of what and who have moral status, abortion is a problem because it can be explained and ruled in both ways (pro and con abortion) by multiple theories. For example, the theory of human properties states that all humans have properties and that the human life begins at fertilization. This theory suggests that once a human’s life begins, they have full moral rights and status. Abortion goes against this theory. This theory states that even an unborn child is protected by moral status, ultimately leading ethics to decide that abortion is wrong and goes against the theory of human properties. While this seems clear cut, there …show more content…
The theory of sentience explains that beings with the consciousness in the form of feeling. If a being is able to feel pain or pleasure, they are protected by moral status according to this theory. There is evidence that has shown that even an unborn fetus can feel pain, therefore, they should be protected and abortions should not be performed. This theory is not always practical to implement though. There are many things in the world that do feel both pain and pleasure. Most of these beings are not technically protected by moral status. For example, if the population was to protect all beings with sentience, people would not be able to eat meat. In order to obtain meat, an animal that has sentience would have to be killed, therefore not protected by moral status. This is not the case in our community as meat is commonly eaten in order to sustain the lives of many people. Therefore, even though the act of abortion goes against this moral theory, the theory itself is not as practical as one may think it is. Currently when abortions take place, there are laws that state that medications medication to reduce pain must be given to the fetus (if they are more than 22 weeks of gestational age). This act therefore could then satisfy the theory of sentience for abortions, as the fetus will technically not be able to feel any more pain due to the drugs that are …show more content…
If a fetus is ultimately causing harm and could lead to complications including death to the mother of the fetus, what is saying that the mother is not protected by moral status any more than the unborn child is? The mother is able to feel pain (has sentient properties), has moral agency, cognitive properties, and human properties. She ultimately fits and is protected by all of the theories of moral status. It can be seen as impractical if the mother is not allowed an abortion in order to save her own life for the life of an unborn fetus that technically does not meet the requirements of many of the theories of moral status, and therefore is not as protected as the mother. Overall, abortion is a highly debatable topic and can be seen as right or wrong for many reasons. Depending on the situation there are many ethical arguments that can be made for the rights of the fetus or even for taking away rights of the
Thou shalt not kill; one-tenth of what may arguably be the most famous guidelines of morality in the western culture, and also the main driving force for pro-life advocates. The argument supporting their beliefs typically starts with the premises that a fetus is a person, and to destroy or to kill a person is unethical. Therefore abortion, the premeditated destruction of a human being, is murder, and consequently unethical. I deny the fact that the fetus, what I will refer to as an embryo up to 22 weeks old, has the right to live. The opposing argument is invalid because a fetus, although perhaps a part of human species, is not formally a person. This leaves it simply to be a part of the woman?s body, whose fate lies solely in the hands of the pregnant woman alone, no different from a tumor she might have. By proving this, the abortion debate then becomes an issue of women?s rights, something that is most controversial indeed. Furthermore, it is fair to question the credibility of many people against abortion because of obvious contradictions in the logic of their belief systems. The fact that this debate is relevant in modern society is ludicrous since there is a simple and plausible solution to this problem that could potentially end the debate for good, leaving both sides satisfied.
(1) The fetus is a person (or moral equivalent) (2) It is wrong to kill persons (C) It is wrong to have an abortion. But there is a suppressed premise needed to make the argument work because the mother also has a right to her own body (bodily integrity). As it stands the
There are variables that could affect her choice. She could be poor, the child could have a birth defect, and so on. Giving her a right to decide whether she should abort the baby, it’s entirely her choice. What if the mother was raped or she got pregnant from incest? Would you traumatise this mother with the child of the rapist for 9 months, and would you allow an inbred child that will most likely have a disability and be put through literal hell?
Abortion has so many different viewpoints on the topic, some positive, some negative. Roe and Wade played a huge part in the decision making process on abortion. Everyone has their own opinions about abortion, but the opinions concerning when life begins have a significant effect on a person’s views concerning whether they are for or against abortion. Studies of the long-term effects of abortion on women are traumatic and devastating. They can include mental, physical, and emotional problems after an abortion.
In our society, there are many ethical dilemmas that we are faced with that are virtually impossible to solve. One of the most difficult and controversial issues that we are faced with is abortion. There are many strong arguments both for and against the right to have an abortion which are so complicated that it becomes impossible to resolve. The complexity of this issue lies in the different aspects of the argument. The essence of a person, rights, and who is entitled to these rights, are a few of the many aspects which are very difficult to define. There are also issues of what circumstances would justify abortion. Because the issue of abortion is virtually impossible to solve, all one can hope to do is understand the different aspects of the argument so that if he or she is faced with that issue in their own lives, they would be able to make educated and thoughtful decisions in dealing with it.
Abortion is a voluminous topic today all around the world. Differing viewpoints on abortion are recognized in politics, religion, and throughout the general population. There is a small amount of people who are nonchalant on the subject. Women have abortions for many different reasons and according to certain groups these reasons are either justified or not. Everyone tends to have their own articulated opinion, and many vocalize tenaciously what they believe. Pro-life individuals along with religion are sanguine that abortion is ethically and morally erroneous. Whereas those who are pro-choice say that abortion is inconsequential and the mother’s choice is more important than the fetus. Reasons to not get an abortion include risks involved in receiving an abortion. In some cases death can occur. However, there are other alternatives to abortion. For example, raising the child and adoption.
Moral status means that there are moral implications to how you treat a particular thing (if, in this situation, should the fetus be treated like a human being and not an object to dispose.) There may be no moral implications to a piece of paper, but there are moral implications to a human being. The question that leads up is, while there is a clear difference between the two, there is a question of what is the reason that we treat one thing as valuable over another. Is the reason we treat one thing as more valuable over another is because one can speak our language, or because one has a heartbeat while the other is practically lifeless? The problem of moral status is central to the question of abortion.
For years, abortion has been an extremely controversial subject. One important aspect of the controversy is whether a woman should be permitted by law to have an abortion and under what circumstances. Another is whether laws should protect the unborn. History has shown that whenever abortion had been prohibited, women still attempted and succeeded in obtaining illegal abortions. Unfortunately, they have suffered serious health reasons or died in the process.
Abortion may appear ethical or unethical depending on various viewpoints and circumstances. The fetus is considered a person and bringing it to term may be unethical as the act is considered as murder. In some situations, the mother may require to terminate a pregnancy for her bodily autonomy (Johnston, 2003). In such positions, the resolution to terminate a pregnancy may be argued as the most ethical choice. The mother is also considered to having a reasonable level of ethical responsibility to the fetus, because she did not take enough precaution to ensure avoiding conception (Cline, 2014). The mother’s ethical responsibility to the fetus may not be enough to deprive her choice of abortion; it...
Abortion is one of the most controversial topics of this generation. Abortion is the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy, most often performed during the first 28 weeks of a pregnancy. Ever since the court case of Roe v. Wade battle lines have been drawn between pro-choice, advocates who support the right to an abortion, and pro-life, advocates who will do anything to stop abortion. Pro-life and pro-choice advocates beliefs on abortion differs morally, lawfully and ethically.
One of the most controversial issues in this day and age is the stance people take on abortion. The two main positions that people take are either of pro-choice or pro-life; both sides, although polar opposites, tend to refer to both the issue of morality and logical rationale. The pro-life side of the debate believes that abortion is an utterly immoral practice that should be abolished. On the contrary, abortion should remain a legal procedure because it is a reproductive right; its eradication would not only take away the pregnant person’s autonomy, but would also put more children in financially unstable homes and the adoption system, and would cause an increase in potentially fatal, unsafe abortions.
Abortions can happen in two ways one by accident often called a miscarriage and the second way is often called an induced abortion where the foetus is forced out of the body. A utilitarian would say that if a couple could not raise the child it would be better if they are aborted because it would put less burden in society. Thus when using the utilitarian consequential principle of ethics, we establish a set general morals and rules in which we can apply to every moral question based upon our utilitarian findings. When this is applied to abortion, we can see that abortion is completely ethical entity that provided “the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest amount of people.” (Jeremy Bentham,
It is almost unanimously agreed upon that the right to life is the most important and sacred right possessed by human beings. With this being said, it comes as no surprise that there are few issues that are more contentious than abortion. Some consider the process of abortion as immoral and consisting of the deprivation of one’s right to life. Others, on the opposite end of the spectrum, see abortion as a liberty and a simple exercise of the right to the freedom of choice.
First of all, in many scenarios, an abortion is necessary and it would be wrong not to let the mother choose an abortion. For example, if a woman is raped, is she expected to keep the child? Of course not! Even if the mother decided to have the baby and support it, for the rest of her life she will be burdened simply because she was a victim of a predator. Also, if a woman was being safe and using protection, and the protection failed, she should be given the chance to choose. Although it was partly her fault, she was being responsible for her actions and practicing safe sex. Finally, there is the circumstance under which tests prove that if the baby is born, it will be deformed or handicapped. Such a child will suffer for the rest of their life, however short it may be. Though the parents may choose to keep the child, if it will suffer physically, they might want to stop its suffering before it even starts.
Abortions have always been a very controversial topic. Over the years we continue to fight for or against it. One can say that is one of the most talked and argued topic in the United States. An abortion is when a woman terminates her pregnancy before the fetus is viable using various of methods. Some argue that abortions should be illegal and considered murder, while others, from a religious point of view, say that no one has the right to take away the life of a person, in this case the fetus. However, others insist, that abortions are a basic women’s right.