Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
History and development of accounting standards
Introduction of accounting standards
Introduction of accounting standards
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Introduction ASC 606 is a new revenue recognition principle that provide standards for recognizing revenue from contracts that provide goods and or services to a consumer. EY identifies the following five steps to apply the new principle: "Identify the contract(s) with a customer, identify the performance obligations in the contract, determine the transaction price, Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract, and recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.("Technical")" Section 451 of the IRC generally requires taxable income to be reported by completing the all-events test and the amount is reasonably determinable ("26"). This can create a variation from the financial statements and the taxable income amount. To further study …show more content…
This ruling changes standards from focusing on just receivables and more on highlighting how the company as a whole is doing (Li). While those interested in the financial statements may appreciate this change, it can change how the companies value themselves, which may not always be for the best. Conclusions and Insights Looking at all the information presented, ASC 606 is no small change that companies can overlook. The impact to recognition of contractual revenue will greatly impact how a variety of industries report their books. These changes can have a domino effect, and some of these organizations may have to look into changing their tax methods to better match their financial statements. ASC 606 will provide better insight and comparisons across financial statements. It creates standards that can be applied across multiple jurisdictions and industries. Therefore, it will streamline the process and better represent changes in revenues and liabilities that companies are expecting or are aware of. It also attempts to bring policies from the FASB and IASB closer as they both passed similar policy
The changes in IFRS will affect some slight modifications to significant amendments of principles. It can affect different areas of financial statements and information. For example, extensive disclosure requirements, financial statements and how specific elements will be recognize and measured. Those elements are financial instrument and employee benefit (IFRS, 2012).
Proper revenue recognition is important in because it has a direct impact on quarterly income statements, incentive calculations, investor confidence, and perception of an organizations financial health. The scandals at Enron and WorldCom illustrate how important properly recognize revenue is to the financial integrity of a company and how abuse can be extremely dangerous. (Labaton, 2006) To maintain consistency across organizations, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) relies on the standards published by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) to establish the guidelines for revenue recognition. (FASB, 2011)
The majorities of financial advisers do not have a formal accounting or tax background and thus have some challenges to overcome when reading tax returns of their clients. However they are still asked to help their clients in future planning. Since most accounting is to be done based on compliance with GAAP it would make sense to think that tax accounting should also be done this way, however both the IRS and the courts have stated that compliance with GAAP is of little significance when dealing with the objectives of tax accounting. The objectives of both accounting methods are simply different, because the primary goal of financial accounting is to provide useful information to all stakeholders and the primary goal of the income tax system is the equitable collection of revenue. Because of these differences it can be said that the users of accounting information are different for both methods. The assumption for financial accounting is the going-concern and the tax accounting system ignores this assumption. These differences give us the concept of timing differences and permanent differences. Understanding...
Plunkett, Linda M., and Robert W. Rouse. "Revenue Recognition and the Bausch and Lomb Case." CPA Journal Sept. 1998: n. pag. CPA Journal. Web. 16 May 2014.
The goal of the Codification is to simplify the organization of thousands of authoritative U.S. accounting pronouncements issued by multiple standard-setters. To achieve this goal, the FASB initiated a project to integrate and topically organize all relevant accounting pronouncements issued by the U.S. standard-setters including those of the FASB, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA), and the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF)
IASB revenue recognition benchmarks entering the merging venture comprised of two gauges, IAS 18 and IAS 11. IAS 18 worries about revenues including offer of products, administrations, intrigue, eminences and profits. IAS 11 centers around development contracts. Likewise with all IASB gauges, these standard give standards-based direction without particular direction at the exchange level. The guidelines of U.S. GAAP, gave by FASB, then again comprise of an arrangement of more than one hundred revenue related direction of particular principles on an industry and exchange level; in any case, a great part of the general direction is given by Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts No. 5, a non-legitimate wellspring of U.S. GAAP. The IASB and FASB are ready to embrace a joint standard on revenue recognition. This new world standard would adopt an advantage obligation strategy, for example, that of pre-meeting IFRS, while containing more particular direction than IFRS clients are acquainted with seeing, taking a signal from the GAAP guidelines of the United
Generally, revenue is recognized when it is probable and reasonably estimable. While this definition of revenue exists under both methods of accounting, the current revenue requirements in IFRS can be quite difficult to apply to multipart transactions. Because IAS 18 provides very limited guidance on topics like multi-elements arrangements and software recognition revenue, some companies have developed their IFRS accounting policies by referring to parts
Differences remain between U.S. GAAP and IFRS when it comes to revenue recognition. U.S. GAAP gives detailed rules covering 200 different pronouncements about how revenue should be recognized while IFRS offers two standards, IAS 18 and IAS 11; these deal with revenue and construction contracts. There is a current proposal for a new revenue recognition standard for both IFRS and U.S. GAAP (Doupnik & Perera, 2014). This standard seeks a main direction and corrects inconstancies between the two different views. This proposal would bring a unity to both entities and more progress toward
Financial Accounting Standards Board. (1985). Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 86. Norwalk. Retrieved April 7, 2014, from http://www.fasb.org/cs/BlobServer?blobkey=id&blobnocache=true&blobwhere=1175820922177&blobheader=application%2Fpdf&blobheadername2=Content-Length&blobheadername1=Content-Disposition&blobheadervalue2=189998&blobheadervalue1=filename%3Dfas86.pdf&blobcol=url
GAAP reporting standards (AICPA, n.d.). A private business owner can utilize the concise and familiar accounting principles and accrual income tax or cash basis method of financial reporting to assess the company’s performance and provide relatable decision-making information to stakeholders (AICPA, n.d.). Moreover, it is a cost-effective measure for business owners that do not have to comply with U.S. GAAP base financial statements. In addition, CPAs can provide value pricing by preparing meaningful and concise reporting to internal and external parties. However, a business owner should carefully consider and examine the available options before deciding on an appropriate reporting framework. In order to provide the best short-term and long-term solution, it is imperative to consider a company’s business structure and future
Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) were first established in the 1930s in response to the historical stock market crash in 1929. Nowadays GAAP is influenced by several organizations including the Financial Accounting Standards Advisory Council (FASAC), Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Publicly trade companies are required to follow GAAP in the United States. Many other countries have their own set of accounting principles. In today’s global business climate, many businesses need to grow in order to survive. A small business may choose to merge with a bigger another company, and a large company may want to acquire a small company in order to expand in certain condition. More and more international mergers and acquisitions are happening nowadays. But how would they adapt to the ever-changing accounting standards in different countries? There are complications of consolidation of the financial statements when companies make merger/acquisition deal. To be able to adapt to the new business environment, GAAP is also making changes. International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) were first developed by the International Accounting Standard Board in 1973. IFRS gained its popularity quickly. Nowadays, over 100 countries recognize IFRS. As the biggest economy in the world, United States (United Nations 2012); however, did not plan to implement IFRSs until 2011. In this paper, we will discuss the possibilities of future of convergence between U.S GAAP and IFRS.
... to the topic or accounting policy options in full IFRS that were dropped from the IFRS for SMEs, or it relates to the principles of recognition and measurement in full IFRS that have stayed changed by simplifications in the IFRS for SMEs and they are not considered to be suitable based on the needs of consumers or cost-benefit concerns. For example, some disclosure in full IFRS are more relevant to investment decisions in the public capital markets from transactions and other events and conditions faced by the typical SMEs.
Over the last several years, the controversy of the United States adopting International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) has been a significant issue for many businesses who are pro Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Although U.S GAAP has been the common accounting principles for many countries, specifically the US, now countries are adopting IFRS. In addition, there are many organizations such as European Union (EU) and International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC), who want domestic and international businesses to have one set of standards to be implemented. On November 14, 2008, the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed a rule named “Roadmap for United States Issuers”. This proposed rule could potentially force businesses that are publicly traded in the United States to begin implementing IFRS for the years after December 2014. Moreover, transitioning from U.S. GAAP to IFRS can effect financial reporting, operations within a company and can cost companies money.
Accounting gives companies, investors, regulators and others with a standardized way to explain the financial performance of an entity. Accounting standards present preparers of financial statements with a set of rules that they have to follow when preparing an entity’s accounts, making sure this standardization is across the market (Robert 2008). Many Companies are required to publish their financial statements in accordance with the relevant accounting standards. To simply International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) is one set of accounting standards, which have been established and maintained by the IASB with the purpose of those standards being efficient of being useful consistently. These two bodies work together to come
The success of a company is very dependent upon its financial accounting. In accounting there are numerous Regulatory bodies that govern the accounting world. These companies are extremely important to a company because they set the standards when it comes to the language and decision making of a company. These regulatory bodies can be structured as agencies, associations, commissions, and boards. Without companies like the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC), The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), Internal Accounting Standards Board (IASB), Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and other regulatory bodies a company could not make well informed decisions. In this paper the author will look at only four of them.