Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Individual differences in learners
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Individual differences in learners
Standard #6 Assessment I understand that each student is different and that one test will not be able to assess full understanding. It is important to guide support and to monitor learning progress to help students develop as learners. This standard is significant to a teacher because it is assessing students’ comprehension and overall progress. It aids the teacher in scaffolding the student and creating appropriate activities to support the students’ learning process. Furthermore, the teacher can benefit and improve his or her teaching practices to better evaluate students effectively. The consequences of not knowing this standard are students not being able to fully demonstrate understanding because progress is not measured through multiple
...wledge which can be detrimental to the students who have surpassed these standards. The test does not encourage students to increase their knowledge, but only to meet requirements. Teachers should be able to tell if a student is ready to pass on to the next grade level without a standardized test based solely on each student’s grades, work, and intelligence as revealed in the classroom.
Current educational policy and practice asserts that increased standardized student testing is the key to improving student learning and is the most appropriate means for holding individual schools and teachers accountable for student learning. Instead, it has become a tool solely for summarizing what students have learned and for ranking students and schools. The problem is standardized tests cannot provide the information about student achievement that teachers and students need day-to-day. Classroom assessment can provide this kind of information.
Darrell Sabers and Amy Olson reviewed the Wide Rage Achievement Test 4th edition (WRAT-4) in the Mental Measurements Yearbook eighteen edition. In their review Sabers and Olson mentioned differences and similarities between the WRAT-4 and the previous three editions of the WRAT. The WRAT was created to assess “basic academic skills necessary for effective learning, communication and thinking” in addition it evaluates people age 5 to 94 years old that have learning, behavioral, and vocational struggles. The test is separated into four subtests which measure reading, spelling, math computation, and sentence computation. The sentence comprehension subtest is recently added to the WRAT-4 due to previous criticism about the reading subtest, which did not include any reading, but otherwise no extreme changes have been made to the other subtests. The WRAT-4 also offers the choice of combining the word reading and sentence comprehension standard scores to obtain a reading composite score. While the WRAT-4 itself is easy to understand and gives clear directions for administration, the reviewers advise against administering the test as a group, the exception being the second halves of the spelling and math computation subtests but only if it is given in groups smaller than five. The test manual is large and contains information on how to score conversion appendages. Sabers and Olson suggest creating a smaller manual with only the necessary information to administer the test to make it more convenient. Standard score come with confidence intervals and percentile ranks based on age and grade. The reviewers recommend adding confidence intervals around the percentile ranks since they are easily interpreted and widely used. The reviewers prop...
Even with material being taught incessantly, standardized tests can not accurately measure a student’s ability. The tests are “single-target—meaning that every student, no matter what level of achievement or ability, course selection, or cu...
After taking the Personal Survey of Assessment Literacy, I learned a lot about myself and what I do know about assessments, and what I don’t. This survey allowed me to reflect on the process that I take to plan, develop, and administer tests in my class and what I need to do with the results. When I went through the criteria of all of the topics in the survey, I honestly did not know what the survey was talking about or what it meant. This was really concerning to me because I like to think that I do a pretty good job when it comes to instruction of my class and how I assess their knowledge of the material. I learned from this survey that there are a lot of things I do well during assessments and that there is still a lot that I need to learn to be an effective classroom leader. After scoring the survey, I noticed that I scored myself the highest in the section of During Test Administration with a perfect average score of 5 and scored an average of 4 in the section After Testing. The two lowest sections I scored in where in the General Considerations with an average score of 3.3 and in the section of Prior to Test Design with a score of 3.5.
Students dread the time of the year when they stop with their course material and begin to prepare for test. Everyone is in agreement that some type of revolution is needed when it comes to education; eliminating standardized test will aid the reform. The need for standardized testing has proven to be ineffective and outdated; some leading educationalist also believe this because the tests do not measure a student’s true potential. This will save money, stop labeling, and alleviate stress in students and teachers.
Organise dates and times with team meetings so standardisation actions can be considered. Ensuring assessors have experience and knowledge in the area of their subject. Information from the assessor as to what is to be monitored from which candidate and when. Therefore, Identifying the criteria that is to be assessed and IQA from the qualification using various methods e.g. Observations, written evidence, questioning, and R.P.L. Assessors will be observed with their decisions of the outcomes and sampled by the IQA. On an on-going basis, identifying as to what can be amended with constructive feedback. When completing in a summative stage, you would be checking the full assessment process with signatures and dates on all documents, maintaining accurate records throughout the IQA
This assessment score surprised me for I feel that I am very tolerant and adapt well to change, but maybe, as I get older, I resistance change because I have found principles and ideas that work well to achieve success and see change as only undermining what is already working (McShane & Von Glinow, 2016, p. 429). McShane & Von Glinow (2016, p. 428) says that “constructive communication” can overcome resistance. This statement is directed at management, but I plan on using this same advice to overcome my own resistance to change from management. Changes are occurring in my department and some role realignment is going to take place, as this occurs, I agree with McShane & Von Glinow (2016, p. 434) that this change will cause me additional stress, of course, now that I know this I can actions to prevent it. An article written by John MacArthur’s says that the Apostle Paul when faced with pressure still reserved “room in his heart to feel the anxiety of other” (MacArthur, 2012), so when thinking of change, instead of just seeing it as something that is stressing me out, I need to realize that others are probably going thought the same emotions and symptomize with them other, for MacArthur also says that, “Anyone who knows and loves Jesus Christ is capable of handling pressure like that” (MacArthur, 2012). I also need to remember that God is in control and no matter what changes occur God will see me through it (Matthew 6:26). By managing change better, will make me a
I feel that this model ties in nicely to our current policies and especially ties into the Danielson framework and the Common Core Standards. The easy to follow format of the assessment model made sense and really stuck with me.
Yes, ma’am I agree with your assessment. Educators have so much to worry about throughout the school year to make sure students learn the assigned curriculum and pass the STAAR. No matter the subject or grade level one teaches, there is never enough time. As a special education teacher, I must ensure that my students have the appropriate accommodations in place for the STAAR-Alternate assessment as well as proper objectives that meet their individual needs. My paperwork must be as perfect as possible since it can be audited at any time and my certificate be on the line. Furthermore, I worked on my professional counseling practicum this semester. I was saddened to see that our three middle school counselors are stressed beyond words with
Standardized testing is not an effective way to test the skills and abilities of today’s students. Standardized tests do not reveal what a student actually understands and learns, but instead only prove how well a student can do on a generic test. Schools have an obligation to prepare students for life, and with the power standardized tests have today, students are being cheated out of a proper, valuable education and forced to prepare and improve their test skills. Too much time, energy, and pressure to succeed are being devoted to standardized tests. Standardized testing, as it is being used presently, is a flawed way of testing the skills of today’s students.
IQ scores reliability ranged from 95 to .98 while the five Factor Index reliability range from .90 to .92. Reliabilities for the 10 individual subtests averaged from .84 to .89.
Assessment, in the context of education, was defined by Lambert, D (2000, pag 4) as the processs of gathering, recording and using information about pupils' responses to educational tasks. Despite some can consider that assessment is separated from the learning process, assessment is, in fact, an essential part of the learning proccess. Maguire, M. and Dillon, J. (2007, pag 213) pointed out that assessment is intrincately bound-up in the teaching-learning cycle.
As teachers, we have to monitor the progress our students make each day, week, quarter and year. Classroom assessments are one of the most crucial educational tools for teachers. When assessments are properly developed and interpreted, they can help teachers better understand their students learning progress and needs, by providing the resources to collect evidence that indicates what information their students know and what skills they can perform. Assessments help teachers to not only identify and monitor learners’ strengths, weaknesses, learning and progress but also help them to better plan and conduct instruction. For these reasons, ongoing classroom assessment is the glue that binds teaching and learning together and allows educators to monitor their efficacy and student learning.
Standard 6 standard states, “The teacher understands and uses multiple methods of assessment to engage learners in their own growth, to monitor learner progress and to guide the teacher’s and learner’s decision making” (Council of Chief State School Officers, 2013, April, p. 10). This standard is a hard standard to feel like you can fully be successful on. When I first began teaching, it was something that I struggled with. My students have a hard time looking at their assessments and seeing growth. When they hear the word pre-test, they want to just “Christmas Tree” their answers. They know that the test does not count against them so they are done with the test of 30 questions in about fifteen minutes because they just marked answers