Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effects of abuse on children's development
Parental abuse effects on children
Negative effects of Child Abuse
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effects of abuse on children's development
Lyle and Erik Menendez were just two young males who had their whole lives ahead of them. That soon came crashing down on August 20th, 1989, when they began taking out their rage against their parents that night. The brothers started their horrendous acts on their farther, Jose, who was known to be extremely tough on the young boys and allegedly performed sexual acts on them too. Soon after finishing off their farther, they begin to torture their mother, Marie Louise, mostly known by Kitty, who knew about the sexual abuse and hard time the boys went through and did nothing, received the blunt of their anger. Combining the shot wounds on both Jose and Kitty, there were a total of fifteen shots all together. The brothers had their plan all worked out, and were going to get away with it had it not been for younger brother, Erik. Keeping the secret of the murders weighed too much on Erik and he soon confessed everything to his therapist, L. Jerome Oziel. Even after the confession, the boys were still not convicted of these crimes. Nearly seven months after the crimes the boys were arrested …show more content…
Some seen them as the victims, where as some seen them as cold blooded killers. The brothers played up the idea that the murders of their parents were their only way out. During the trial, Erik’s attorney brought family members, coaches, neighbors, and friends to the stand to describe what Jose and Kitty were like to the boys. All of them saying how hard he was on the boys and how he was prone to embarrass the boys when they did not meet his standards (“Menendez Brothers’”). Soon, the judge was done hearing about the parents, and brought the boys to the stand. Both boys told the court of the abuse they endured, and how they believed that their parents were planning to kill them soon because they could not keep their mouth shut about the abuse. The media covered this case throughout it all because it was truly
However, there were many others who were involved in the trial against Casey Anthony. For example, there was the bounty hunter Leonard Padilla, he tried to get a lead on Caylee from Casey after she was released from jail. Meter reader Roy Kronk had found a plastic bag of human remains in a wooded area near the Anthonys' home, the remains were confirmed to be those of Caylee Marie Anthony. After the trial has been started, there have been many more people involved in this criminal case. Casey’s defense, Jose Baez shocked the media when he accused Casey’s father of covering up the death of Caylee in the family pool and for sexually abusing her. Involved with George, was his mistress Krystal Holloway, who had little relations to the case. This led Casey to revealing about her brother, Lee Anthony who she had claimed had made sexual advances towards her. However Lee Anthony does not turn out to be the father of Caylee, so he shows no real importance to the case.
Many controversies occurred in the town. Evidence was small and the debate of whether the teens were innocent or guilty was very unclear. In early 1994, all three teenagers were found guilty and put in jail for life. Several books have been written about the case. A lot of people have found that it was unfair for these boys to be convicted since there was said to be no hard evidence. Two books in particular explore deep into the case. They both consider people involved, and the unfairness of the entire case. Each author has an opinion as well.
Perhaps the biggest factor in why these brothers murder can be attributed to the theory of Subculture of Violence. Subculture of violence states that those who are poor or less fortunate are more likely to engage in violent acts, such as murder and rape. This is attributed to their social standing, and their inability to get out of the lower social classes. The actual cause of violence in these situations is poverty and social inequality. While the brothers are not lashing out at those who are significantly richer than them, they are lashing out at those who are more powerful than them. They are also lashing out at those who make others poor and impoverished.
Is it possible to sympathize with two calculated killers, if they claimed abuse? The jurors of the Menendez brothers’ first trial thought so. The Menendez brothers came from a wealthy family who lived in Beverly Hills, but everything was not as posh as it seemed. Lyle and Erik Menendez seemed to have it all, but their family allegedly had a deep secret. This secret eventually came out on the day that they murdered their parents in cold blood. The brothers shot their parents in their own home, like professional hit men. Aside from this trial, there have been many other cases showing conflicting ideas between jurors. In the play Twelve Angry Men, written by Reginald Rose, he portrays the modern-day problems with the justice system. Through researching this case and reading the play, Twelve Angry Men, one can infer that the jurors from this play would hav/e great difficulty in coming to a verdict in the Menendez Trial.
Michael Johnson,also known as, Tiger Mandingo is a gay black male. He was a college wrestler at Lindenwood University. Johnson was HIV-positive. He would normally go on random hookup apps and have unprotected sex with complete strangers. On October 13,2013 Johnson was accused of infecting a man with HIV. Although Johnson pleads not guilty, he was still charged to 60 years in prison. This is currently an important or trendy topic because it is all over social media and it has been a controversial topic. Many have questions as to why was the sentence so harsh and others say it is what he deserves. Michael Johnson’s sentence was not justifiable because the laws used to convict him are outdated, he was poorly represented,and he was not judged
Thats why Luis would never get caught or when the police did try and investagate they could not track anything leading back to Luis he was a very smart killer. I believe he committed these crimes because his past was terrible and he was abused and he had problems when he was little along with his family. I think his motive would be revenage. When Luis turned his self in after he got caught for the first time to get lesser punishment he told the police where all the bodies were. He also wrote a speech on how sorry he was and to make up for what he did. Luis seemes to be intelligent but killing young boys isn’t. Luis is smart but not intelligent because he did get caught one
Before their trial had started, it was clear that Lyle and Erik Menendez killed their parents. The question was, why did they kill their parents? It was assumed it was greed alone that had drove the brothers to shoot their parents (Latson, 2015). Defense attorneys countered that with an alternative motive, a lifetime of abuse (Latson, 2015).
This most likely was the start of things to come for Donald.He lived with his lover, Carl Hoeweler.
In a way, the novel accurately describes the court proceedings that would have happened to anyone at this time. Through these proceedings, we see the innocence in the young men, especially in Archie McLean and Alex Hare. These boys are the youngest and appear to be the most innocent men throughout the novel, which brings an insight into the reasoning behind their actions. Alex Hare, the man who, in court, defined his relationship with the McLean boys as “[picking his] friends poorly,” was in fact the man who delivered the fatal blow to Johnny Ussher (Bowering, 227). The McLean boys repeated through the court proceedings that they “did not kill Johnny Ussher… He killed [them],” (226). The McLeans and Hare almost contradict themselves within the court, claiming that they did not kill Ussher, as well as stating that they had something they needed to do and that Ussher was essentially a result of them doing what needed to be done. Charlie claims that the boys had something they needed to do that couldn’t be done from jail, and that is why there happened to be a fatality (227). Although the reader knows the extent of the boys’ characters and the reasoning behind the decision they made, the courts do not know such a thing. However, it is incredibly difficult to stand a fair trial when the defendant has been shot to death. With this knowledge, the courts produce the only
The Mexican Mafia define what is deviant from their organizational/ subcultural point of view by issuing out hits for those who disobey the moral values of the deadly gang. Also, the gang members that were told to commit the hits on other prison members or even some on the streets and chose to refuse were getting “whacked.” The Mafia never decided to kill any children because they claimed that was against what their gang stood for. It was dishonorable. Until, one gang member by the name of Jimmy “Character” Palma killed a mother and her two children. According to they autopsy Character meant to pull the trigger and the innocent children and was only supposed to do a hit on a mafia dropout. Rene “Boxer” Enriquez did not handle the situation
“The victims were enjoying the scenery, Doe explains, “the night was warm and beautiful with their dreams ahead of them as big as the stars of that night until the flashlight quickly approached them.” Mike Mageau was attacked in a similar fashion as the first murder: shot once they responded to the killer’s demands of leaving the car; in fact Doe states, “Mageau was certain the man was a police officer, which was the reason he opened the window...to show his ID.” After the shooting an anonymous person contacted the police department, and “He,” Doe explains, “identified himself as being responsible for killing the previous victims, Faraday and Jensen.” However, this one was different since Mageau was alive, though left in critical condition, progress to the investigation could have been substantial enough to identify the killer. Nonetheless, as claimed by Doe, “Progress really was not made” due to the amount of blurred and ambiguous information the police received, which ended up wasting five weeks without making any
The article Rethinking Entrapment by Joseph Colquitt speaks to several arguments concerning the criminal justice systems entrapment doctrine. Colquitt’s assertions are that entrapment is a preferred method used by law enforcement and is not restricted, However, human rights activist contend the tactic is grossly misused and requires control to prevent misuse. The method of entrapment is viewed by the public as a deceptive practice. The community is suspicious of officers due to entrapment procedures and feel it conflicts with police community relations. Furthermore, Colquitt’s article focuses on how to improve the use of entrapment practices as it is a necessary process of law enforcement officers to discourage as well as capture criminals
With Tex were Susan Atkins, Pat KRenwinkel and Linda Kasabian. That fateful night five people were murdered. The next night, tragedy struck again. This time, it was grocery shop owners Leno and Rosemary LaBianca. For this murder, Leslie Van Houten came along who was anxious to prove her loyalty to the family. Leslie states “I knew that people would die. I knew that there would be killing.”Along with her came Krenwinkel, Tex, Atkins, Kasabian and Manson himself. After the murders, the family got arrested on unrelated charges and moved back out to Death Valley. The family was arrested again for arson and auto theft but the police soon realised the dismal
I won’t lie, I cried a bit during the prosecutors closing statement. The prosecutor started out with a replay of the audio tape of the killing, the family of the victim broke down as the victims screams before and after she was shot echoed in the courtroom. I heard so much more detail in the audio tape than I heard the first time and it is haunting me, the gurgling of blood as she tried to breathe, the victims friend wailing for her to not leave her. I feel messed up about this case, maybe it was too much for me? Regardless, the prosecutor ended his statements with large pictures of the 3 little boys who are now motherless, it was powerful and my heart sank for the little boys. The defense attorney did a good job with his statement considering, in my mind, the case was a slam dunk. I keep thinking about the little boys that are now living with the victim’s sister. What type of damage was done to them? I wrote a list of things that I noted throughout this case in regards to the kids: they had to endure their mother’s relationship with this man that was twice their mother’s age, who was in and out of jail, who moved them all over the southern states, they never seemed to have a stable living situation, their mother broke away from him and now their only father figure (good or bad) was gone, they then have a new random
While child abuse does not always result in a serial killer, the aftermath of the neglect and abuse is unforeseeable and can have many alternate routes. The researchers were trying to answer the question of if there was a common factor that many or all serial killers shared that could have attributed to their psychological issues. From the research gathered, it would appear that child abuse is a common factor, however it is not guaranteed that all serial killers experience child abuse and not all children that experience abuse will become serial killers. Some problems posed with this research is that an extensive amount of the information obtained was from an unconnected third party, therefore the truthfulness of the information must be scrutinized. Also, some criminals may lie about their past. Some may say that they were abused to have an explanation for their heinous crimes, or some may downplay their past because they do not wish to disclose vulnerable aspects of their life. In all, the child abuse among lust serial killers could be considered to be a factor in their murderous actions. It is warned, however, to not generalize these findings to all serial killers, as the information gathered was determined off a group of lust serial