A Small Crime by Jerry Wexler

652 Words2 Pages

Everyone in life has caused mischief or trouble to the community during their lifetime. There is always reasoning behind these acts whether it creates memory for one or just due to immaturity of a person. In the short story, “A Small Crime” by Jerry Wexler, a young boy, at the age of nine years old, commits a crime of plagiarism and is later disciplined by his parents. However, his father eventually tells him his own personal experience of writing on a wall in the railway station. The age of a person highly affects their reasoning behind the actions they perform, as one ages, one is able to have a more valid reasoning for their actions due to one’s greater knowledge and familiarity with society. When the boy was first caught by the police of the crime he committed, his parents brought him back home in order to correct his inappropriate behaviour. The boy’s emotions gradually begin to change as he experiences anxiousness to sadness and later to loneliness. The boy is unable to provide a justified reason for the crime he committed in public. He felt guilty of committing an act due to his innocence and confusion at a young age. This can be demonstrated as his parents prohibit from giving him more allowance and “he could not help but be apprehensive”. Later on, when he is not invited to enjoy supper with his parents he is deeply saddened since he values his relationships with his parents, especially telling his father about his adventures. Finally, the boy experiences loneliness as he has gradually begins to understand the consequences of the choice he decided to make as a child. The author use of explaining a young tree that his grandfather had planted is a sign of symbolism. As the plant begins to sprout leaves, it eventually g... ... middle of paper ... ...tand the impacts of his acts. Even though the father performed a wrongful act, his logical and understandable reasoning allows him to be seen in a more positive light than his son. Sometimes when one commits a disgraceful act to the community, there will sometimes be a proper motive that initiates them do it. The author displays irony that even though the father and his son performed the same crime, the audience will have a different viewpoint towards each person. They understand and can excuse the father’s behaviour due to his longer experience in life which caused him to have a specific intention for doing the act he did. However, the audience will have a more difficult time trying to connect and defend the boy since, due to his premature age and inexperience, he is unable to properly justify the reasoning behind his actions and the benefits it provides himself.

Open Document