The purpose of the speech provided by Chimamanda Adichie is to portray the various impacts a single story can have on both an individual and a society. This is because of the usage of stereotypes provided by the media which creates an overall image, that everyone believes to be true. This is prominent when she says “A single story creates stereotypes, and the problem with stereotypes is not that they are untrue, but that they are incomplete.” Having a single story also confines the world to generalized outlooks on cultures, religions and nationalities. Due to this, individuals must seek for diversity and different perspectives, in which everyone should be able to see the world as it is, not just the aspect that the media portrays. Through …show more content…
This speech provides a fair amount of information about the dangers a single story can bring. Therefore, it makes individuals more cautious when it comes to relying solely in the media and believing the stereotypes that are present ubiquitously. In addition, she also makes use of flashbacks in order to put her individual perspective and explain the importance of her view of a single story. She said, “Their poverty was my single story of them.” referring to the houseboy, Fide. Her use of personal anecdotes also places a sense of empathy to the audience, as it is an issue that affected her personally. She demonstrates how the danger of a single story affected her when she talks about her roommate “My roommate had a single story of Africa: A single story of catastrophe”. The idea her roommate had of her depicted Adichie as an incompetent individual who lived in constant fear without knowing how to function a stove, or speak english. Adichie also ends her speech by using rhetorical questions such as “What if we had an African television network..?” “What if my mother had told us that Fide’s family was… hardworking?”. Using rhetorical questions are extremely persuasive as they were are asked with a purpose and intention, making the reader think twice before answering. There was also a presence of the Aristotelian appeals being Ethos, Pathos and Logos. Adichie was able to successfully employ ethos …show more content…
For instance, the aspect of a ‘single story’ is a metaphor by itself, and it is present throughout the entirety of the speech. It convinced the audience of the negative effects of cultural ignorance and stereotyping. A single story is a metaphor for the dangers of stereotyping, the negative impacts it has on individuals and the common misconception given by the media. There is also the use of Historical Allusion. Adichie refers to John Locke when he referred to African Americans as “beasts who have no houses” and “people who have no heads”. This allows the audience to realize the power of stereotypes and misconceptions, how they were present back then and how they are present now. Adichie also successfully employs the use of repetition throughout her speech. Throughout her speech she repeatedly talks about the various ways African’s are mistreated throughout society. At minute 4:50 she talks about her roommates misconception towards africans “ Her default position… was kind of patronizing, mell-meaning pity”. On minute 12:16 she talks about her cousin and how “he died because he could not get adequate healthcare” and on minute 13:26 she talks about the “5000 people [that] apply for one job vacancy in
In Thomas King's short story "Borders," a Blackfoot mother struggles with maintaining her cultural heritage under the pressure of two dominating nations. Storytelling is important, both for the mother and for the dominant White society. Stories are used to maintain and pass on cultural information and customs from one generation to another. Furthermore, stories can be used both positively and negatively. They can trap individuals into certain ways of thinking, but they can also act as catalysts that drive social change within society.
As a former slave, bereft of any free will, written words were all but unavailable to Frederick Douglass. Slaves were unable to tell their stories, to expose the dehumanization that their enslavement caused on both sides of the racial rift; so it was necessary for Douglass to fight tooth and nail to obtain the right to learn, and ultimately to narrate his own life story. Amongst the narration, multiple rhetorical strategies are integrated into the text in order to uncover the dehumanizing effect their mistreatment had on slaves during this time. His primary purpose is to educate those who are ignorant of the horrible conditions that slaves lived in and the cruelty that they suffer. He does this through the use of rhetorical devices such as anecdotes, irony and by further connecting to his audience with pathos and ethos. By using his own personal experiences as the subject of his argument, Douglass is able to make a strong and compelling case against slavery; at a time when it was socially unacceptable to do so.
In Douglass’s Narrative, Douglass uses his eloquent storytelling skills and provocative rhetoric to both display the horrors of slavery for Whites and Blacks as well as convince the public that slavery undermines the values of the nation and Christianity. He uses his former mistress, Mrs. Auld, as an example of how slavery corrupts White women, who embody Christian values and nurturance in the home. She transforms from a kind, idealistic exemplar of a proper woman to a complete monster. Furthermore, Douglass appeals to his White audience by distinguishing true Christianity by the one practiced by slave owners. Slavery turns White owners into violent, greedy, and blind hypocrites to the message of God. Finally, he also compares the perils slave escapes are similar to the those of the forefathers who fought for this nation by referencing Patrick Henry. His own bravery for choosing between slavery and potentially fatal consequences for escaping reflects how the American people were willing to die for their their liberty, and this analogy make abolitions a more recognizable and patriotic crusade for American rights. His entire narrative is the epitome of a Transcendentalist, American success story of self-reliance and organized principles to success -with the additional white stamp of
Through the use of his words, Douglas is not only able to make the audience hear his argument but visualize it as well. Douglas’ uses a lot of imagery, metaphors and symbols to help better understand his speech. Through the use of imagery, Douglass shows the struggle for freedom with the founding fathers and the condition of the slave in America at the time he’s the speech. He paints a picture for his audience about how the founding fathers wanted to set themselves free from a tyrant king and how they accomplished their goal. He also uses many metaphors through out his speech. One being the most effective one, “For it is not light that is needed, but fire; it is not the gentle shower, but thunder. We need the storm, the whirlwind, and the earthquake” (69). By saying this Douglas is trying to say that only talking is not going to do anything but something stronger to let them know that it’s going to take much more than that to end slavery once and for all. This piece compares to Rogin’s writing style but Rogin uses imagery and metaphors as well. In the beginning of the text he quotes William Carlos Williams who says, “History begins for us with murder and enslavement, not with discovery” (26) which already allows the readers to picture in their mind the kind of brutality he is speaking of. The imagery that comes to mind is the cruelty towards the Native Americans on their
While different texts may have various rhetorical situations, each of them corresponds with a number of fundamental components such as the author, audience and purpose. In light of the fact that cultural backgrounds and experiences are critical in shaping the author’s rhetoric moves, it is necessary to examine them first. Truth was one of the most courageous African-American anti-slavery campaigners and probably one of the very first ‘...
When comparing the two short stories and holding them in tension with each other, it is neither the black woman nor the African American man’s arrogance, but one’s hubris that is the source of the difficulties of one’s race and the demise of oneself. Wright believes that the black woman is the source of difficulties. Hurston believes that the black man’s hubris is the cause of his demise. By holding these two stories in tension with each other, the emerging truth is that hubris is the cause of downfall.
In one way it is symbolic of the African Americans’ struggle for equality throughout our nation’s history. The various hardships that the narrator must endure, in his quest to deliver his speech, are representative of the many hardships that the blacks went through in their fight for equality.
The word danger probably makes you want to turn away and stop doing whatever it is that you are doing. Well, what do you do when you see the words, “The Danger of a Single Story?” These words had me nervous about what I was going to be watching. However, there was a lot of information that was explained throughout this 20-minute TED talk from Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie. This paper will explore compelling ideas she mentioned that relate to things I have experienced when I went to another culture, the risks of telling a single story narrative in intercultural interactions, ways to protect myself from single story misconceptions, and how I was able to see how a single story might affect the way I communicate with others in different cultures.
Frederick Douglass was brought from Africa as a baby to the U.S. to become a slave during the 17th century. In his narrative book “Narrative of The Life of Frederick Douglass,” he used rhetoric to provoke reader’s emotions, and inspiration of hope when everything isn’t good. Douglass used the rhetoric appeal pathos to show people how horrible he was treated as a slave, and how he kept up his motivation about becoming free from slavery. In addition, he also used pathos so effective that readers can see his experiences in front of themselves.
America in the mid to early nineteenth century saw the torture of many African Americans in slavery. Plantation owners did not care whether they were young or old, girl or boy, to them all slaves were there to work. One slave in particular, Frederick Douglass, documented his journey through slavery in his autobiography Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass. Through the use of various rhetorical devices and strategies, Douglass conveys the dehumanizing and corrupting effect of slavery, in order to show the overall need for American abolition. His use of devices such as parallelism, asyndeton, simile, antithesis, juxtaposition and use of irony, not only establish ethos but also show the negative effects of slavery on slaves, masters and
Watch this Ted Talk, The Danger of a Single Story: https://www.ted.com/talks/chimamanda_adichie_the_danger_of_a_single_story?language=en (Links to an external site.)
In The Narrative of Frederick Douglass by Frederick Douglass, an African American male describes his day as a slave and what he has become from the experience. Douglass writes this story to make readers understand that slavery is brutalizing and dehumanizing, that a slave is able to become a man, and that he still has intellectual ability even though he is a slave. In the story, these messages are shown frequently through the diction of Frederick Douglass.
In order to convince, one must fist charm the inner feelings of the audience. In Frederick Douglass's Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, he appeals to the interest of the reader through his first hand accounts of slavery, his use of irony in these descriptions, and his balance between evasiveness and frankness.
In analyzing Kate Chopin’s “The Story of An Hour” it is unquestionably an ironic, satirical, fiction abundantly filled with literary imagery and raw emotions. Chopin commences the narrative focusing on the frailty of Mrs. Mallard’s heart condition and the extent at which her sister, Josephine and husband’s friend Richards take measures to inform her of her husband’s passing. Mrs. Mallard comes to an emotional impasse grieving over her husband’s sudden accidental death and realizes her newly found emotional freedom that altogether overwhelms her in pure jubilation that is shortly lived.
Racism and sexism thinly veiled by xenophobia in America, Adichie portrays these two factors in society. Generally by putting her main character through a consistent stream of seemingly routine events involving one or even both of the factors. Often times she deals with micro-aggressions about her hair, which does not fit the American standard of beauty and elegance. Often showing how people are quick to assume that she is unintelligent simply by her skin and her accent. Often times Adichie portrays Ifemelu as the object of criticism and envy. Ifemelu is merely struggling to survive in a new environment. An environment that by all accounts constantly attempts to tear her down, her psyche and emotional stability constantly suffering damage.