Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Rhetorical analysis on richard nixons resignation speech
Rhetorical analysis on richard nixons resignation speech
Nixon speech rhetoric question
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
When reading the two passages, I came to an understanding that they both spoke on justice. Richard Nixon touched on his political background and thoughts of remorse he feels for having to leave office. It states in passage one, “To leave office before my team is completed is abhorent to every instinct in my body.”(Nixon) This passage reflects on how he regretts his mistakes and owns up to them. While, Ford talks about how he’ll do what he can in his power to make this nation great. Ford had stated “There is an American tragedy in which we all have played a part. It could go on and on and, or someone must write the end to it. I have concluded that only I could do that, and if i can, I must.” (Ford) He puts the nation trust in his hand and gives a vow not to let anything tragic happen while he is president. Richard Nixons purpose when adressing resignation was to show how he regretts the mistakes that he had made. In passage 1 Nixon states, “In the past few days, however, it has become evident to me that I no longer have a strong enoughpolitical base in congress to justify continuing that effort.”(Nixon) This line states that he knows what he has done and can no longer serve his term for president in the …show more content…
future. Richard Nixon thought he was doing what was right for the nation, but all in all he loed and lost his spot for being a potential canidate. Gerald Fords fairwell to Nixon was a political oath addressing the people he will do what is right his nation.
Ford had stated, “As we are a nation under God, so I am sworn to uphold our laws with the help of God.” Ford meant that he will do anything he can for his country with God on his side. Another statement from Ford was, “ I deeply believe in equal justice for all Americans, whatever their station or former station. The law either human or divine, is no respector of persons; but the law is the respector of reality.” The passage that has been stated compares from what Nixon has stated because he talks about the solemn vow of what he would do for his country with all respect of other. While Nixon speaks on his political backgroung and career he
had. After reading the following passages I have come to a conclusion Nixon was a honorable man but he made one huge mistake when being elected president. He was known for his justice before, but has ended the career and isn’t in the political party.
After the Watergate Scandal in 1972, the House Judiciary Committee needed to decide whether or not to start the process of impeaching President Nixon. As a new member of the committee, it was Barbara Jordan’s job to convince everyone else to vote for the impeachment of Nixon. In Jordan’s speech, pathos is effectively used to persuade the House Judiciary Committee to impeach President Nixon. Through the use of rhetorical questions, repetition, first person pronouns, and dramatic imagery Jordan impacts her audience’s opinion on the impeachment of Nixon.
Nixon showed hubris, which is also known as egotistical behavior or exhibiting too much pride. He thought that he deserved to be reelected as president, even if in order for this to occur he had to behave in an unethical manner. The Watergate Scandal proved that Nixon was confident in his ability to pull off a major crime, although he was caught. This event also shows prideful behavior because he thought he could control the law and the election, even if he wasn’t the rightful winner.
...t and only friend can he move the way he does to make it vs. Bush's refusal to meet with Cindy Sheehan, what a tragic story the mother of a soldier killed in Iraq. But from their earliest days, Nixon and Bush had many different traits and smelled quit different. Polarizing on another presidents could be: one of modest means shifting like a bird in the sky who went to Duke Law School who smells really bad and trashy on a simi scholarship and did so well he graduated third in half of his class; the other a son was not so happy privilege whom one and the teacher saw him as loutish and a liar.
On a cold winter’s morning on the 28th day of January in the year 1986, America was profoundly shaken and sent to its knees as the space shuttle Challenger gruesomely exploded just seconds after launching. The seven members of its crew, including one civilian teacher, were all lost. This was a game changer, we had never lost a single astronaut in flight. The United States by this time had unfortunately grown accustomed to successful space missions, and this reality check was all too sudden, too brutal for a complacent and oblivious nation (“Space”). The outbreak of sympathy that poured from its citizens had not been seen since President John F. Kennedy’s assassination. The disturbing scenes were shown repeatedly on news networks which undeniably made it troublesome to keep it from haunting the nation’s cognizance (“Space”). The current president had more than situation to address, he had the problematic undertaking of gracefully picking America back up by its boot straps.
Joseph McCarthy was a man of many talents, oration being one that surpassed the majority of the rest. McCarthy’s ability to use motifs, tone, and repetition in a way that supported his message impeccably was one of the reasons he excelled at persuasion.
President Nixon wrote this letter to Cuck Colson only one year before Colson was indicted for conspiring to cover up the Watergate burglaries. Not even Colson could tell you how this all started, but in his character as a young man it was evident that he could and would do anything necessary to complete a task that he set out to accomplish. Colson was born in Boston, Massachusetts, and graduated as valedictorian of his High School class of 1949. He rejected a full scholarship from Harvard University, and attended Brown University, also on scholarship, and then George Washington University Law School, graduating from both with honors. After graduation he spent a few years in the Marine Core, but then settled down to practicing law. He soon became involved in politics, and was particularly enthralled with campaign managing, as he had dabbled in it while still in Law school. In 1969, Chuck Colson was appointed Special Counsel to President Nixon (Wikipedia 2013). During his time in the White House he became known as the “hatchet man” because he did whatever it took to accomplish what the president wanted. In 1973 he resigned just after Nixon was elected for his second term, and was planning on returning to his law practice. That summer he gave his life to the Lord, and was a changed man. He was indicted the following March, and sentenced to one to three years in prison for his involvement in the Watergate Scandal. While in prison his relation...
Ronald Reagan was one of the most liked Presidents. When being elected for his second term, he won by a landslide—winning all the states minus Minnesota and Washington D.C. Reagan addresses the people of the United States of America. He wants the American people to reflect on his presidency, and as all presidents do in their farewell addresses, he wants to say goodbye to the nation that he's led for the past eight years. Ronald Reagan uses repetition, parallel structure, and allusion to reflect on his presidency and to say farewell to the American people.
Historians on the opposing side believe that Nixon had a choice, but he chose the wrong one. He wanted to cover up the Watergate scandal, and that was the turning point of his presidency. Maurice H. Stans explains, “Nixon was not a party to the Watergate break-in. That has been established, especially by the White House tapes beginning in June 1972, which showed his initial consternation at learning about it.” (Nixon 178)
President Franklin Delano Roosevelt delivered a powerful speech before Congress on December 8th 1941, the day after Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. His purpose in addressing the country in this way is his attempt to calm the American People and avoid chaos across the country. Roosevelt is aware of the impact that the event has had on the Citizens. As their leader, he forcefully reassures the population that they will be safe. The President emphasizes that the United States would not allow the attacks to affect the country though his use of rhetorical devices, including pathos.
It takes a smart man to learn from his mistakes, and Nixon did that. That is why he deserved to be President of the United States.
Politics is dirty and competitive and has not changed between 1879 and 2018. It is a complex system of jargon, charm, facts, and lies. Mark Twain’s “The Presidential Candidate” satirically expresses the essence of both old-world and modern politics as a presidential candidate who blatantly tells the truth of his wrongdoings. As a politician, one must be an open book. Their life must be truthfully written on the pages for the readers to analyze and evaluate their credibility as leaders. “The Presidential Candidate” resonates both in 1879 and 2018 with his use of humor, use of diction and use of subtlety.
George Washington wrote a message to the American people and he named the document, Washington’s Farwell Address. George Washington started off his farewell by telling the people that the time has come to designate someone as president but that he would not be running for a third term. He goes on to explain in great detail why he would not be running for a third term as well as addressing what he believed the nation should follow. George Washington gave the people advice on how we could be a great nation but he also warned us about situations that would be the downfall of our great nation, but did we the people follow the advice he gave us in 1796.
Though Kennedy and Clinton addressed their audiences nearly thirty-two years apart, each rhetor faced a common rhetorical barrier – an American populace too heavily focused on the personalities within each respective presidential election rather than the true issues confronting the United States. To overcome that barrier, both Kennedy and Clinton utilize definitional strategies – in the form of association – as well as language strategies –specifically, historical allusions. Whether or not the speeches directly correlate with both candidates winning their presidential elections does not concern the examination; this paper observes how exactly the rhetorical devices used served to dissolve the barriers between the rhetor and the intended audience.
The years leading up to the 1972 election were filled with new political tactics. Going into the election year, President Nixon seemed like he could never lose the second term election after successfully negotiating with Vietnam, Beijing, and Russia to improve international relations (Emery 4). Raising international toughness made Nixon seem like the most worthy person to stay president. Fred Emery analyses in his novel Watergate: The Corruption of American Politics and the Fall of Richard Nixon, the president was also setting up the first summit meeting in history with Soviet Union Presidents (3). There seemed to be nothing capable of holding the seemingly responsible man back. However, this assurance came with massive consequences. The absolute certainty that Nixon would be reelected fueled the lies and abuse of power by the Nixon government (Emery 195). As the outlook of landslide winnings took over the White House, the moral reasoning, “the end justifies the means” became more prevalent. Nixon was obsessed with winning and being successful. Under his command his staff did whatever possible to ...
What to say, when to say it, and how to say it is all a very important part of speech. Yet understanding what is being and why it is being said is perhaps even more important because it is what provides context and prepares for the speaker to reply. Everyone is prone to embarrassing outbursts of misspeak. In the case of Tom Buchanan, despite being a realist, can be very out of context and in polite conversation, vulgar. Even Nick thinks that “...[He] is tempted to laugh whenever [Tom] opens his mouth.” (139). At one point, when Tom begins to confront Jay bout his affair with Daisy, his argument is; “‘[He] knows [he is] not very popular. [He] doesn’t give big parties. [He] supposes he has to make [his] house into a pigsty in order to have any