In “Proficiency” Shannon Nichols explains her experience with taking the ninth grade proficiency test and how it has altered her love for writing. Shannon Nichols was an honor roll student throughout elementary and middle school who never received anything below a 3.0 GPA and loved writing just as much as she loved math. In March of her eight grade year, Shannon Nichols had to complete the ninth grade proficiency test which determines whether a student receives their diploma. She was smart and she knew it which lead her to assume she would, without a doubt, pass every section of her test.
She felt the test was challenging, but had confidence she had passed. To her surprise she passed every section excluding one, writing. She could not understand how she could have possibly failed. “How could I have screwed up writing? I surely spelled every word correctly, used good grammar, and even used big words in the proper context. How could I have failed?” exclaimed Nichols. Ultimately, she got over it. She continued her honors English class and passed with an A. By October she felt she was
…show more content…
prepared to pass the test. Evidently she failed, again. Failing the second time around brought her down, she felt she had disappointed her family and let herself down. Not being able to understand what she could have done wrong led her to quit trying so hard which eventually led her to pass on the third try. Even though she passed, she never had the same love for writing she once had. She feels if someone was able to explain what she had done wrong she would have maintained her love and enthusiasm for writing. In my eleventh grade year I took the Scholastic Aptitude Test, I also passed every part excluding writing. The score I received was unacceptable on my behalf and I made it a requirement to take it again. When I took the writing portion of the test I simply answered the question as I would answer any other question, I later realized that was a mistake. I took preparation classes for this test but I do not recall practicing the writing portion. I scheduled another date to take the test again my senior year. The second time I took it, I answered the question differently, instead of writing it in paragraph form I answered it in an essay format. When I received the score I was far more satisfied now then I was the first time. The difference between my experience and the experience of Shannon Nichols was that I was able to realize where I went wrong after seeing a digital copy of my writing assessment, Nichols was not able to know where she went wrong and was only able to know her score. In “Teaching College English- it’s a battle” George Leef discusses why he believes teaching college English is a battle.
In the article Rick Diguette explain why he considers teaching college English a battle. He discusses the attitudes and behaviors he has witnessed with college students. The battle is largely fought against bad habits such as misspelling. Students were often told to not worry about the spelling but to express themselves. Professors also encounter the whining behavior. This behavior is associated with students who feel and believe that they have received a grade lower than the grade they believe is deserved. Another behavior they experience is the confidence barrier that freshman students have. Students who believe they were more than good at writing papers enter college with the same attitude, and they resist if a professor attempts to tell these students
otherwise. George Leef discusses the experience of helicopter parents. These are the parents who will defend their child and, in this case, demand to know why their child has received the grade he or she received. Another behavior described is when a number of students the professor would believe dropped the class will eventually reappear. These students return pleading for mercy even when almost nothing was done throughout the semester. Concerning George Leef’s argument on student behaviors, I agree. The behaviors he discussed are commonly displayed in today’s college students. The behavior I have witnessed the most is the reappearing students. These students generally come to class everyday for the first two months then suddenly disappear. Most but not all will return around the middle of the third month if not the towards the end attempting to make up all the late and missed assignments they have not not done. In “Looking forward: an academic race to the bottom” Mark Miller discusses the experience he had being a professor at a private university. Miller describes how a private university has similar characteristics to a retail business. He believes colleges are offering the least amount of work a student must complete in order to obtain a degree. He soon realized that students were not being treated as students, but more so as consumers. When Miller was teaching at the private university he noticed how different it was compared to teaching at a public community college. The night Miller taught his first class. He had a female student leave class early and informed him as to why. Several students began to leave the class before it was over. According to the article, after Miller graded essays, a student said to him “‘I paid for this class, I expect to pass it and get a good grade.’”. When Miller told his students that they must remain in class until it was dismissed and missing too much class time could affect their overall grade, he was then told by his students that their other teachers allowed them to come and go as they pleased. Compared to public community college, students had to attend classes regularly and earn their grades, but private universities did not follow the same protocol. Three weeks into the semester , Miller received a call from the dean and was told to reduce the amount of homework he was giving the class. Miller finished the term feeling as if he did not teach but merely showed up to class. According to Mark Miller’s point of view on private universities being more like retail business, I disagree. Before attending Manor College, I attended a private four year university. I attended this university for about a year, and within that year I was responsible for the grades I received. Complaining about the grade received would not have changed anything. If a student was not fond of the grade received, he or she would have to discuss it with their professor and find a way to fix or receive extra credit. Complaining to the dean that the professor was giving out too much work would not make a difference, the dean would simply suggest meeting up with a tutor. Nichols, Shannon. “Proficiency.” W.W. Norton: The Norton Field Guide to Writing, W. W. Norton & Company, 2016, https://www.wwnorton.com/college/english/write/fieldguide/model_essays.asp. Accessed 16 Aug. 2016. Leef, George. "Teaching College English — It’s a Battle." National Review, 28 July 2017, www.nationalreview.com/corner/449944/college-english-battlefield-martin-center-article (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Accessed 29 July 2017. Miller, Mark James. "Looking Forward: An academic race to the bottom." Santa Maria Times, 27 July2017, santamariatimes.com/opinion/columnists/looking-forward-an-academic-race-to-the-bottom/article_106715bb-e039-5912-aec3-0f1da288003e.html. Accessed 29 July 2017.
In the article “Clive Thompson on the New Literacy,” writer Clive Thompson argues that the widespread use of technology and social media does not make kids illiterate and unable to form coherent sentences, but instead, keeps them actively writing and learning. Thompson’s article is based off of a study done by Andrea Lunsford, a writing professor at Stanford University. Thompson agrees with Lunsford that the use of social media and the Internet allow students to be creative and get better at writing. In his article, Thompson quotes John Sutherland, an English professor at University College of London, to inform the audience of the opposite side of the argument. He states, “Facebook encourages narcissistic blabbering, video and PowerPoint have
When analyzing the article “Blue-Collar Brilliance,” written by Mike Rose, and the article “Shop Class as Soulcraft,” by Matthew B. Crawford, you can see several differences in the strategies they use. Rose’s text was an educational article about the intelligence gained through manual labor trades. Roses intended audience is the well educated, professional class, as well as educators, and individuals working in white collar jobs. His purpose is to prove that not all blue-collar workers need an education to succeed and to bust the stereotype that blue-collar individuals can gain the essential skills and education from their jobs. Crawford also based his article around blue-collar work, he mainly focuses on the values the craftsman, being a craftsman
In Florence Kelley's speech to the people attending the NAWSA convention, she uses emotional appeal to motivate her audience to convince their male counterparts to legalize voting for women, and also to persuade the males to help put an end to child labor.
In Jay Heinrichs, “Thank You for Arguing”, the Eddie Haskell Ploy was a rhetorical virtue that stuck out and closely connected to me. When unsure if you will win an argument, the Eddie Haskell Ploy explains, “…preempt your opponent by taking his side” (Heinrichs 65). This not only makes you look like you knew what you were doing all along, but it makes the opposing side respect you more and leave them feeling more cared about and confident in their side. For example, after Jay Heinrich’s daughter used this sly ploy, he stated, “Even though I saw through the ruse, I admired it. Her virtue went way up in my eyes” (Heinrichs 64). This ploy is a classic move that my siblings and I would always pull on our parents. For instance, when I knew asking
“A Modest Proposal” was written in 1729 by a satirical author by the name of Jonathan Swift. Swift studied at the University of Oxford and was also know for his popular writing in Gulliver’s Travel. The purpose for his satire “A Modest Proposal” was to enlighten the citizens of Ireland about their hardship and suffering. He informed them about their scares of food, money, and property, but provided a possible solution to their problem. To persuade the people Swift adopts a comforting and friendly tone to his audience for the people to react to his solution.
Authors use rhetorical strategies to express themes in their writing. Different rhetorical strategies help convey different themes with varying degrees of effectiveness. One way to measure the effectiveness is to rhetorical analyze two pieces of writing to each other and see which is best.
In Patricia Limerick’s article “Dancing with Professors”, she argues the problems that college students must face in the present regarding writing. Essays are daunting to most college students, and given the typical lengths of college papers, students are not motivated to write the assigned essays. One of the major arguments in Limerick’s article is how “It is, in truth, difficult to persuade students to write well when they find so few good examples in their assigned reading.” To college students, this argument is true with most of their ...
“Bitterness keeps you from flying. Always stay humble and kind.”- Tim McGraw For most of my life so far, there has always been one word that has stood out the most to me. It is a word that has always followed me and will continue to follow me forever. “This word is humble”.
In 1729, Jonathan Swift published a pamphlet called “A Modest Proposal”. It is a satirical piece that described a radical and humorous proposal to a very serious problem. The problem Swift was attacking was the poverty and state of destitution that Ireland was in at the time. Swift wanted to bring attention to the seriousness of the problem and does so by satirically proposing to eat the babies of poor families in order to rid Ireland of poverty. Clearly, this proposal is not to be taken seriously, but merely to prompt others to work to better the state of the nation. Swift hoped to reach not only the people of Ireland who he was calling to action, but the British, who were oppressing the poor. He writes with contempt for those who are oppressing the Irish and also dissatisfaction with the people in Ireland themselves to be oppressed.
Mike Rose met many struggling students at UCLA’s Tutorial Center, the Writing Research Project, and the school’s Summer program. He first describes the loneliness students feel upon arriving at college, and that as they try to find themselves, they all to often lose themselves because they are bombarded with ideas that are so foreign to them. He introduces his audiences to Andrea, a bright young girl out of high school who, despite hours of memorizing in her textbook, could not obtain a passing grade on her Chemistry mid-term. How is this possible if she spent so much time studding? Rose explains that she failed because in college, and in this course in particular, it is not enough for a student to know the material, but rather, to be able to apply it in a various amount of problems. Yet the problem Andrea faces is that she was never taught this in high school.
A young girl is excited about graduating high school and attending her first year at college. She tries hard at school and receives above-average grades. She is an active student involved in student council, band, the drama team, and peer tutoring, but her ACT scores are extremely low, disqualifying her from many universities. The young girl represents many students who are not successful at taking standardized tests because they have not developed the advanced skills required to take a test like the ACT or SAT. An academically motivated and responsible student should not be prevented from attending college because a "standard" test is not his or her standard. The current methods of testing for the ACT or SAT should be abolished and replaced with modified and less "standard" questions to better measure a student's learning potential. In addition to different testing techniques, a student's learning potential should be a measure of a culmination of activities and methods; testing should be less important than other methods in determining a student's learning potential, if not the least important. Standardized testing must evolve to encompass a more diverse student population, and it should not be the primary factor in measuring learning potential.
As writers, many students write to the expectations of their professors and not to their fullest potential. Throughout English 101 I had been writing only to please my professor or to fill the basic requirement to pass English. I always felt that my writing ability was never enough for my professors throughout the previous years. They always wanted clear and concise essays, which for some reason was unreachable by me. However, starting college and taking English 101 helped me with my weaknesses and changed my technique of writing essays. My experience in English 101 taught me to write to my fullest potential and to write what I felt; rather then writing what was required.
I believe that the purpose of education is to produce the next generation of leaders who are intelligent and have great character. This idea is supported in the article “The Purpose of Education” by Martin Luther King. Martin Luther King Jr. was a civil rights activist who fought for black and white people to have equal rights in America. He writes about the true purpose, and meaning of education in the article by saying, “Education must enable one to sift and weigh evidence, to discern the true from the false, the real from the unreal, and the facts from the fiction (MLK1).” This quote from the article explains that being academically educated is very important. It will help people stand up, be a leader, and take charge to make the world a better place for everyone. That gallant leader will argue against the fallacy, lies,
‘I am going to fail’ was the very first thought that crept into my mind on that very first day of class. Before I stepped into the classroom on the first day, I felt pretty good about my writing. I had done previously well in English, and didn’t think this class would be much of a challenge. This all changed on the first day of school, when my professor talked about the level of reading and writing expected for this class. I remember thinking ‘I don’t read, why couldn’t I have been born someone who likes to read?!’ Since this moment on the very first day of class, I have grown immensely through hard work. In this essay, I will explain what I have learned over the course of this class about myself, and about writing.
I should receive a passing grade in this class because I can write now. Not just an exaggeration, but after another semester of English I finally feel confident that can write. Three of the reasons behind my confidence is I learned, I experienced and best of all I repeated. These three values helped prepare me for what is in store in English 1302 and here is why.