A Rhetorical Analysis Of Pokemon Go

742 Words2 Pages

A new app has taken the world by storm, and it is: Pokemon Go. A strongly debated topic is on the rise as Pokemon Go tops Twitter’s daily users and discovers people spending more time in its app than on Facebook. Is Pokemon Go beneficial or detrimental to the current society? Ryan Matthew Pierson’s article, “Pokemon Go has taken over the world - and it’s a good thing” speaks positively about the app and promotes that it is indeed beneficial. On the contrary, Alexandra Petri’s article, “Pokemon Go, An Honest Review” assails this app. Pierson’s explanation of self-experiences, choice of language and application of statistics well overpowers his competitor in this debate and is the most compelling. Petri has no ground in comparison to Pierson’s …show more content…

Pierson’s tone is formal “Pokemon Go benefits from Niantic’s previos dive into augmented reality…” (Pierson). Furthermore, his writing is also quite laudatory, “There is already a case where people playing Pokemon GO have actually helped fight crime” (Pierson). And yet, he exemplifies a light-hearted tone as well, “You’re playing? You’re in the club” (Pierson). All of these components found in Pierson’s tone aid in evoking interest and does a spectacular job of compelling his readers. On the other hand, Petri is exceptionally hypercritical “There are whole classes of Pokemon who look like nothing so much as daffodils who have been in industrial accidents, or drug-addled goldfish, or like if you described a cat to a sketch artist and the sketch artist only retained one thing of everything you said” (Petri). On top of that, sarcasm is off the charts “People are praising Pokemon Go as a rare activity that gets you to talk to strangers and go outdoors. Well, we used to have a hobby like that. It was called smoking. I’m thinking about taking that up, instead. It might get me off Pokemon Go” (Petri). If that was not enough, Petri is also churlish and unmannerly as she yells through the computer screen “WAKE UP, SHEEPLE! ZUBAT CANDY IS ZUBATS!” (Petri). Not one of Petri’s tone descriptions are positive. In fact, they invoke anger from an audience and is

Open Document