A Rhetorical Analysis Of Nixon Commercials

1362 Words3 Pages

Richard, Nixon was the first civil rights for every Americans. The Nixon commercials was the convincing commercials of 1968. The title of the video is 1968 Nixon Vs. Humphrey V.S Wallace which are very interesting. All three candidates are in different parties. Nixon is in the republican party, Humphrey is in democrat’s party and Wallace is in independent. Nixon, He appeared in many situations and his words are very great. He was from California. He went to Whittier college and Duke university law school. Ads gives information about how Nixon said that American should be free from domestic violence. His ads created an image about the war that was going on Vietnam, about the crimes, violence and other activities. The commercials were very …show more content…

This is a great connection between youth and the world. Today in the world we need more youth to be able to make country successful. I strongly support his words and this world needs more people to make perfect. The better the world the better the people will be. We need a better country, we want to live in a country where we can do everything we want and live it freely. His claims are useful and connected to many people opinions. People would be able to vote for him because of his thoughtful ideas about the world and worlds itself need more people like him. In my opinion, he should be a president because he wants to have or done many things about the country, for example providing peace, free from domestic violence and inspire people to change the world. If I were to vote during that time, I would vote for him. Presidential campaign Is all about motivating people to vote, the better the commercials, the more vote they will earn. If they make country better than, it will come to better opportunity. Everyone wants to have more opportunities to live their life better. Everyone wants to express their opinions and views about the candidate. Expressing their opinions are the great way of making best decision about the country. everyone has a different opinion about different people, it all depends on their beliefs and culture. Some people …show more content…

“Democrat commercials was to convince the public the Humphrey could be trusted and Richard Nixon not”. This is just opposite because his republican commercials were to inspire people to change the world. What would make people think about that he is not trusted? This is not true, people should know the difference between them two, they are totally in different party. The ads linked to have problems with many democrats. People make many negative comments about Nixon, just because he refuses to debate Humphrey one time. I strongly support Nixon and I am not in any parties. It should all depends on how they want to make the country if they want to make country better then, that’s all you need, go ahead and vote for him because we need more people like him. Voting Are always the main reasons to choose a better candidate. Many people don’t like his ads, but he was successful, he won many states because he got most electoral vote and he won the election. voting is very important and it does not matter if they make negative comments, it’s all about their views and thinking. It depends on how many votes they got, if they got most vote in many bigger states, that’s all matters in voting. He was from the Republican party, and most democrats don’t like his thinking and his commercials which is very sad, his claims are

Open Document