Divine Pungi
Sydney Brown
English 120s
April 26 2018
4.5 Rhetorical Analysis Assignment
There are various things to do in order to lose weight, such as starting a diet, being healthy as well as eating healthy. We continue to believe what is the right way of being healthy in the way we view food in which involve eating less and more different. There are a few things to understand to fulfill our basic needs such as being able to make a difference between the good and bad cravings our body has. As well as knowing what nutrition facts are showing and most importantly how to read and understand nutrition facts and how to live a healthy lifestyle.
“When we attempt to rise above our animal nature through the moralization of food, we unnecessarily complicate the process of eating,”(Maxfield, pg. 446) as Maxfield states to prove that food isn’t moral or immoral. Maxfield’s major claim is that our understanding of health is mainly based on culture as it is in fact, eventually begins to refer articles in order to support her beliefs. As she quotes Paul
…show more content…
Campos, who is a law professor, and journalist, to affirm the flaws there are in the perception of fitness, diet, and health. Campos also notes that “lies about fat, fitness, and health…serve the interests of America’s diet industry,”(Maxfield, pg. 444) to prove it, meanwhile Maxfield also quotes Kate Harding who is fat-acceptance activist, “if you scratch an article on the obesity crisis, you will almost always find a press release from a company that’s developing a weight loss drug- or from a ‘research group’…funded by such companies”(Maxfield, pg. 444-445). Maxfield states that Harding and Campos strongly affirm that the BMI isn’t proven and become a staple for medicine when it was developed to be a “purely statistical tool”(Maxfield, pg. 445) therefore supports the claim that BMI can’t nearly predict an individual’s health at all. Although nutrition may seem to concern only a small group of individual, it should in fact concern anyone who wants to live a healthy life. Fast food has been an ongoing epidemic for years in America. It is known to be one of the leading contributors to obesity in America. This is a huge issue in fact for Americans and should be the main focus to people today. If fast food could be regulated more efficiently, the obesity rates in America could dramatically decrease. People should be in control of themselves. In another word, if someone wants a Big Mac, all the power to them to do so. However, it becomes a threatening situation when impressionable adults and children are taught to ignore their doctors and go through life with the issues that are related to obesity, and eventually are okay with never changing their diet because they were told to “Trust Yourself. Trust Your Body. Meet Your Needs.” The rise of diabetes and obesity in the United States did not happen naturally, it is the result of people ignoring medical research, and eating what they want because of people like Campos, Harding, and Maxfield spreading their beliefs, telling unhealthy people, that they are indeed healthy and that they should accept themselves. “The same critic that argues that “any and all theories of nutrition [serve] not the eater [but] the food industry,” nevertheless proposes his own theory: the elimination of processed food,”(Maxfield, pg. 443). Maxfield continues to display Pollan’s paradoxical views by writing, “he’s a critic of nutrition and food science who nevertheless bolsters the American investment in those industries,”(Maxfield, pg. 443). She then goes by rejecting the idea that these “gastronomical philosophers” Just like Pollan and other nutritionists are the protectors of health, due to their warning of eating too much “often without any parallel warnings against eating too little,”(Maxfield, pg. 444). Maxfield also identifies Pollan’s lack of evidence to support his claim connecting health with weight and goes on to attack the notion that weight and health are somehow connected. Maxfield’s call to stop the moralization of eating would be worthy of praise if she wasn’t lacking in the evidence and credible sources that she herself attacked Pollan for. Maxfield appeals to reason by inserting her views on health with collected pieces of information from her own beliefs and opinions of other unreliable resources.
for example she uses a fat acceptance activist to support her arguments, "the problem is our understanding of health is as based in culture as it is in fact." she uses the opinions of a law professor and journalist, Paul Campos, and fat-acceptance activist, Kate Harding, to support her point of view. Although people who do have the credentials to speak about the validity of BMI of health are usually medical professionals, nutritionists, health research scientists, people with degrees in medicine and health, in which isn’t something they both have. Maxfield extends Campos’ and Harding’s beliefs on health, in fact, that she fully trusts their argument and uses it as evidence for her own claims despite their respective ability of not being in health or
medicine. “Trust yourself. Trust your body. Meet your needs.”(Maxfield, pg. 446) as Maxfield appeals to emotion by wanting the audience to believe that they will live a happy healthy life by following the statement above. Overall, she is trying to set a dangerous precedent, not that people should consume whatever they’re pleased to, however, promoting obesity in such way that obese people are completely healthy and they should persist in eating what they want even though medical research demonstrates otherwise.
In 102 Minutes, Chapter 7, authors Dwyer and Flynn use ethos, logos, and pathos to appeal to the readers’ consciences, minds and hearts regarding what happened to the people inside the Twin Towers on 9/11. Of particular interest are the following uses of the three appeals.
Advertisements are constructed to be compelling; nonetheless, not all of them reach their objective and are efficient. It is not always easy to sway your audience unless your ad has a reliable appeal. Ads often use rhetoric to form an appeal, but the appeals can be either strong or weak. When you say an ad has a strong rhetorical appeal, it consists of ethos, pathos, logos, and Kairos. Advertisers use these appeals to cohere with their audience. Nike is known to be one of the leading brands of the sports shoes and apparel. It holds a very wide sector of followers around the world. In the Nike ad, Nike uses a little boy watching other basketball players play, and as the kid keeps growing, his love for basketball keeps growing. Eventually, he
Media such as movies, video games and television, in general, are all created to support some form of social context. This helps with generating popularity because people are able to relate to the form of media. In Greg Smith’s book What Media Classes Really Want to Discuss, he describes 6 different representational strategies that justifies people’s way of thinking. The trope that I will be amplifying is the white savior tactic. In addition, I will connect this strategy to the movie The Blind Side. There are clear examples throughout the film where racism and low-income cultures exist in which the white family is there to help. The Tuohy family from the movie “The Blind Side” serves as the white savior for the progression of Michael
In the past, the majority of the African Americans were faced with segregation, poverty, violence, and inequalities. In spite of the civil rights movement most were killed and were lynched. Today, African Americans are more likely suffering from issues, including unemployment, lack of education, poverty, drug abuse, political rights, and injustice. In this rhetorical analysis, Ta-Nehisi Coates and Victor M. Rios explained that people of color still face discrimination, racial injustice, and brutality. Also, these two authors attracted their audiences through persuasive expression, tone, and rational methods to discuss discrimination, racial issues, fears, injustice, and cruelty that govern the society as well. These two authors might be trying to make the large society aware of issues that negatively affect the young males of color and obtain their audience 's advocacy. However, Coates and Rios are different in their
There are many different beliefs about the proper way to eat healthy. People are often mislead and live unhealthy lifestyles as a result. Both Mary Maxfield and Michael Pollan explain their own beliefs on what a healthy diet is and how to live a healthy lifestyle. In the essay, “Escape from the Western diet” Michael Pollan writes about the flaws of the western diet and how we can correct these problems to become healthier. In the essay, “Food as Thought: Resisting the Moralization of Eating”, Mary Maxfield criticizes Michael Pollan’s essay about eating healthy, and explains her own theory on how to be healthy. She believes that Pollan is contradicting himself and that what he is stating is false. Mary Maxfield ponders the
I am responding to the request to analyze Radley Balko’s article, “What You Eat Is Your Business” and make a recommendation for or against publication in The Shorthorn at University of Texas at Arlington. In order to respond, I have examined the rhetorical appeals of Balko’s piece and determined why this article should be posted in the next edition of The Shorthorn. I believe that the Shorthorn audience would be interested in what is being discussed regarding of obesity, things that could potentially affect their lifestyle as well as the professors. In “What You Eat Is Your Business”, Balko claims that obesity is the responsibility of the individual not the government, and how our government is allowing American to live an unhealthy lifestyle
In 1729, Jonathan Swift published a pamphlet called “A Modest Proposal”. It is a satirical piece that described a radical and humorous proposal to a very serious problem. The problem Swift was attacking was the poverty and state of destitution that Ireland was in at the time. Swift wanted to bring attention to the seriousness of the problem and does so by satirically proposing to eat the babies of poor families in order to rid Ireland of poverty. Clearly, this proposal is not to be taken seriously, but merely to prompt others to work to better the state of the nation. Swift hoped to reach not only the people of Ireland who he was calling to action, but the British, who were oppressing the poor. He writes with contempt for those who are oppressing the Irish and also dissatisfaction with the people in Ireland themselves to be oppressed.
In “Food as Thought: Resisting the Moralization of Eating” by, Mary Maxfield (pp.442-447), she affirms a bright argument about how food is not moral or immoral. Therefore, you can eat whatever you desire and not suffer any negative side effects, which she ignores. Her key points including stated facts such as “Culturally,we resist these scientific findings,” that people can be fat and healthy, “in favor of a perspective that considers fatness fatal and thinness immortal.”(pp.445) The main point to Maxfield’s claim in healthy eating, is being active and living a fit lifestyle. In “Escape From The Western Diet” (pp.420-427)by Michael Pollan, his argument is to help the American community be enlightened with
When we think of our national health we wonder why Americans end up obese, heart disease filled, and diabetic. Michael Pollan’s “ Escape from the Western Diet” suggest that everything we eat has been processed some food to the point where most of could not tell what went into what we ate. Pollan thinks that if America thought more about our “Western diets” of constantly modified foods and begin to shift away from it to a more home grown of mostly plant based diet it could create a more pleasing eating culture. He calls for us to “Eat food, Not too much, Mostly plants.” However, Mary Maxfield’s “Food as Thought: Resisting the Moralization of Eating”, argues differently she has the point of view that people simply eat in the wrong amounts. She recommends for others to “Trust yourself. Trust your body. Meet your needs.” The skewed perception of eating will cause you all kinds of health issues, while not eating at all and going skinny will mean that you will remain healthy rather than be anorexic. Then, as Maxfield points out, “We hear go out and Cram your face with Twinkies!”(Maxfield 446) when all that was said was eating as much as you need.
Eating the pizza instead of the salad seemed like a good idea at the time, but now one is stuck in this sloth like state hours later. It seems letting cravings control what and how to eat is not the best strategy to healthy living. Mary Maxfield, in her article “Food For Thought: Resisting the Moralization of Food” discusses her views on how people should eat. She believes people crave what their bodies need, therefore, people should eat what they crave. Maxfield claims that diet, health, and weight are not correlated with each other, and because of this, people view obesity as unhealthy, thus forcing them to distinguish “right, healthy” foods from the “wrong, unhealthy” choices. As a result, she concludes that science has nothing to do with
In the article, "Food as Thought: Resisting the Moralization of Eating," the author Mary Maxfield argues that it is not what people eat, but instead how they eat that impacts their health. She claims that people should approach eating by trusting themselves, their bodies, and focus on meeting their nutritional needs (Maxfield 446). Maxfield states that many people have been misled to believe that health, weight and diet are directly linked. "Despite some doubt in the academic circles over connections between diet, health and weight,
“Food as thought: Resisting the Moralization of Eating,” is an article written by Mary Maxfield in response or reaction to Michael Pollan’s “Escape from the Western Diet”. Michael Pollan tried to enlighten the readers about what they should eat or not in order to stay healthy by offering and proposing a simple theory: “the elimination of processed foods” (443).
This article by Greg Braxton gives us his thoughts on the change that “Black Lightning”, will bring to the television universe by telling us that this show will focus on the problems that many African Americans are facing today. Braxton appeals to the rhetorical device of pathos and he appeals to the emotions of the audience by saying, “This is personal to me,” this essay will be him appealing to the audience about why this essay is important to him, and that this show will be a change to most who watch the CW network. This article tells of the story of Pierce an African American who wants to make a difference in his community by, “combatting racist cops and a violent gang,” and this show is bringing to the attention the issues that face many
In The Hungry Soul we find an interesting blend of subjects, methods, and traditions. This book is a fascinating exploration of the cultural and natural act of eating. Kass intensely reveals how the various aspects of this phenomenon, restrictions, customs, and rituals surrounding it, relate to collective and philosophical truths about the human being and its deepest pleasures. Kass argues throughout the book that eating (dining) is something that can either cultivate us or moralize us. My question is, does Kass succeed in arguing for the fact that eating is something that can moralize us as human beings? Although I agree with some of the things that Kass discussed in the book, in this paper I will argue mainly against some of his claims.
Those who wish to lose weight seem to have a handful of options when it comes to the diet they can try. Each diet has a particular lifestyle it is trying to promote and in order to get the best results one must adhere to it as religiously as possible.