Gaunt’s message was very harsh and direct towards King Richard. Gaunt’s son had been banished for reasons Gaunt did not agree deserved such harsh punishment. Act 1 Scene 3 236-245 Gaunt explains that his judgement against Bolingbroke was not fair or even his judgement at all; he argues that he made his judgement out of fear of committing slander. “Violent fires do soon burn out themselves; Small showers last long but sudden storms are short…” (Shakespeare & Bevington, 2014, p. 340 Act, 2 Scene 1, 33-35). Gaunt is warning that the Kings emotional over reacting demeanor will eventually consume him and become his downfall. Throughout the speech Gaunt explains how England has been developed over a long steady history of kings with great attributes …show more content…
Shakespeare uses the gardener’s message as a means of expressing what has happened to England and what must be done to return the government back the way it was. “Go bind thou up young apricot, which like unruly children, make their sire stoop with oppression of their prodigal weight”, is a call to arrest anyone that causes unruly behavior (Shakespeare & Bevington, 2014, p. 340 Act 3, Scene 4, 29-31). The king must command his household; the citizens must obey him, because if the citizens are unruly they will be as those unruly children to their sire. “Go though, and like an executioner cut off the heads of too-fast growing sprays that look to lofty in our commonwealth all must be even in our government”, no one outside of the king shall be lofty or rise to a threatening level(Shakespeare & Bevington, 2014, p. 340 Act 3, Scene 4, 33-36). The king cannot allow anyone governed by him to show strength or influence that may undermine the power of the throne. The lofty or fast growing spray could be an individual, but more than likely as with weeds in a garden would equate to group within the
The beginning of the document is worded in such a way that it has an almost patronizing tone as the emperor praises the king’s humility. However, as the document progresses it becomes much firmer and in the final lines the tone becomes very harsh as the emperor warns the king to never act on his denied demands.
The undeniable pursuit for power is Richard’s flaw as a Vice character. This aspect is demonstrated in Shakespeare’s play King Richard III through the actions Richard portrays in an attempt to take the throne, allowing the audience to perceive this as an abhorrent transgression against the divine order. The deformity of Richards arm and back also symbolically imply a sense of villainy through Shakespeare’s context. In one of Richard’s soliloquies, he states how ‘thus like the formal Vice Iniquity/ I moralize two meanings in one word’. Through the use of immoral jargons, Shakespeare emphasises Richard’s tenacity to attain a sense of power. However, Richard’s personal struggle with power causes him to become paranoid and demanding, as demonstrated through the use of modality ‘I wish’ in ‘I wish the bastards dead’. This act thus becomes heavily discordant to the accepted great chain of being and conveys Richard’s consumption by power.
“I am determined to prove a villain / and hate the idle pleasures of these days. / Plots have I laid, inductions dangerous, / by drunken prophecies, libels and dreams.” Richard III, the evil Duke of Gloucester, is fighting a bloody road to the crown in Shakespeare's dramatic play. Stopped by nothing and with brilliant intelligence, Richard fights his way to the king’s position, clothing his villany with “old odd ends stolen out of holy writ.” With no one to fully trust, Richard breaks many hearts by killing all people in his way, and becomes the unstoppable villain. He hides behind a shield of kindness and care, but when he is alone, his real soul comes alive. Sending murderers, or killing people himself, he has no mercy. Manipulating Lady Anne to marry him and promising Buckingham rewards for his deeds, he knows what he is doing, and won’t stop until the crown lies at his feet.
I chose this word because the tone of the first chapter seems rather dark. We hear stories of the hopes with which the Puritans arrived in the new world; however, these hopes quickly turned dark because the Purtains found that the first buildings they needed to create were a prison, which alludes to the sins they committed; and a cemetery, which contradicts the new life they hoped to create for themselves.
“Hitler is a monster of wickedness, insatiable in his lust for blood and plunder” (Churchill). These are the words of Winston Churchill, who was the British Prime Minister. Churchill, in my opinion, is the most effective political leader when it comes to power of language, manipulation, and words. Despite being known as a great speaker, the speech he made after Germany invaded Russia was what really showed how powerful he is. He used the elements language, words, and manipulation to make the people understand his side.
During 1931, a second grand war begin with national powers uniting together. Many nations instantly took arms, but the US decided to stay neutral. As a result, European countries established a new flourishing fear of being overthrown by eastern communist foes(“World”). Then the dreadful event on December 6, 1941, caused the US to reconsider its own stance on the war. Allied Powers realized their opportunity to use Pearl Harbor to gain a chance to determine their own fate in war. On December 26, 1941, the United Kingdom’s Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, presented a speech eventually known as “Masters of Our Fate” to the US Senate and the House of Representatives(“Winston”). Through the use of esoteric rhetorical questions, vivid metaphors,
There is only the narrator telling the audience what happens as the duo doesn’t speak using dialogue. What does happen, however, is that Pickle claims that he’ll order his man to punish Gauntlet with a horsewhip. This, again, shows social propriety using simple diction. Smollett has pickle seem so uptight and Gauntlet so poor, that Pickle would have his man punish Godfrey instead of him doing it himself. The emotion in Godfrey at this was astonishment and anger. That was what started the actual dueling with swords.
In their verbal encounter, neither Pickle nor Gauntlet ever say anything to directly insult one another. Rather the way they handled their conversation was the result for the quarreling of swords at the end of the excerpt. Pickle's tone is by far more anger-driven than Gauntlet's, since Gauntlet's tone presents a sense of superiority over pickle, rather than pure anger towards him. In addition, the narrator's calm, indifferent tone in the second paragraph shows the social norms of the society. "A formal challenge having passed between them, they alighted at the first inn, and walked to the next field, in order to decide their quarrel by the sword." A sword fight to terminate an argument was typical for this time period which explains the lack of shockness from the
"Gaunt: O, spare me not, my [brother] Edward's son, For that I was his father Edward's son, That blood already, like the pelican, Hast thou tapp'd out and drunkenly carous'd. My brother Gloucester, plain well-meaning soul, Whom fair befall in heaven 'mongst happy souls, May be a president and witness good That thou respect'st not spilling Edwards blood." (II.i) That passage simply states: You may be a king, but you could have respected my brother enough not to kill him. There is also another quote were Mowbray indirectly suggests that the King is also at fault. "Mow: O, let my sovereign turn away his face, And bid his ears a little while be deaf, Till I have told this slander of his blood, How God and good men hate so foul a liar." (I.i) Yet with saying this remark about the King, he also begs for his innocence.
Also, he is asking the greater power to direct him and to help him do what is right. Similarly, when Friar Lawrence is in the tomb of the Capulet’s with Juliet, he declares, “A greater power than we can contradict hath thwarted our intents. ”(V.iii.158). This displays how a greater power is controlled by what happens to them. The greater power is ruining their plans, and managing their lives.
This shows that what the British are saying, and what they are doing, do not match. Which causes the people of the nation to realize that the king is acting like a dictator instead of a king who cares for his people which is the people are the convention to raise an army and break away from this type of
...have judgment here, that we but teach/Bloody instructions, which, being taught, return/To plague th' inventor: this even-handed justice/Commends the ingredients of our poisoned chalice.” (Act 1, scene 7, Lines 8-12). It displays that he is scared that if he kills the King, he will teach the future generations to do the same thing to him and kill him. Thus, he is very disturbed and unsettled if he should continue with the murder.
Shakespeare is of course establishing Henry's ability to gather support from the masses, the very key to his victory over Richard later in the play. The speech also clarifies Richard's position on the subject to underline this contrast between the two men. To fine tune Richard's character, Gaunt gives a revealing and unbridled description of Richard to his face just before dying. After Richard exiles the soul heir to his estate, Gaunt is bitter and fed up with his weak and pompous qualities:
Richard II is not your average king. He is useless with his power and does not know how to use it. He is the king of England when the play begins but shortly after his kingship is taken away from him. Richard II is a young man who has not matured much since his adolescence. He is disconnected from his land and its people, which becomes one of the downfalls of his crown. He has an extraordinary flair for poetic language. He is witty and poetic personality doesn’t work with his higher calling in life. A king should be strong and fearless. King Richard II is not a man of action and as the play advances, he gets into more and more trouble. As his end approaches, he becomes very poetic. Like most Shakespearean heroes, Richard II has a strong theatrical personality. He likes putting on a show and enjoys a bit of wordplay, even at his own expense. What sets him apart from other Shakespearean characters is the perverse joy he takes in his downfall.
Nevertheless, as a man of action, Bolingbroke has achieved for himself the goal of retrieving his father Gaunt's estates and much more. He, in the end, is king, King Henry IV. And though Richard as king was full of pomp and ceremony, those things were no match for ambition carried to its fullest. His strong words belied incompetence as a ruler, and he could not hold his position. It seems that it was inevitable that Bolingbroke would be the victor at last. Richard should have taken more note of his usurper, before he was such, this man he called "[Gaunt's] bold son" (1.1.3).