Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The effect of drinking and driving
The causes and effects of drunk driving
The causes and effects of drunk driving
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The effect of drinking and driving
The importance of the law often get forgotten by ordinary American citizens. Frank Trippett in his excerpt, “A Red Light for Scofflaws,” argues that Americans think that law-and-order is threatened mainly by violent crime. He supports his argument by first giving examples of the minor laws that people seem to ignore, such as speeding and littering. He continues by stating that breaking these ‘minor’ laws have a greater affect on foundations of social order than people think they do. The author’s uses a serious tone to get American citizens to understand the major impact that these minor laws can have if they are broken. These minor laws were made to keep people safe and citizens should take these laws much more seriously because they are more …show more content…
important than people think they are. Trippett argues that law-and-order is threatened by breaking minor laws just as much as it is threatened by violent crime. He states, “When it comes to tax codes, or laws against littering or speeding or noise pollution, more and more ordinary citizens are becoming scofflaws.” The author is trying to explain that ordinary citizens are becoming people who casually break the law all the time. People often don’t understand the seriousness of disobeying minor laws. People may only be breaking minor laws that aren’t nearly as bad a committing a felony, however those small laws were made to keep people safe and could cause some serious problems if they are treated like they are unimportant. Even laws as simple as littering or speeding have important roles in protecting society.
People often disobey rules such as littering because they assume that is won’t harm anyone, but people don’t really think about the long term effects. Littering won’t necessarily harm someone at the time that it is being done, but it will eventually have a major impact on the plants and animals living in the area. Laws against littering are made to keep our environment clean because that ultimately will affect how we live in the future. Laws regarding driving is also another law that is treated as if it is unimportant, however there are many dangers in breaking driving laws. Laws such as speeding or texting or drinking and driving are critical because the second that the driver’s attention is on something else rather than on the road, not only is the driver’s life at risk but so are the peoples’ lives around them. Drunk driving and texting while driving are notorious for creating nothing but chaos and have both caused many accidents and put many people in danger. If an accident is happens from texting and driving or speeding and results in death, those ‘minor’ laws suddenly become just as serious as a felony such as murder. Overall, minor laws can have the same results as serious
crimes. Citizens may think that by disobeying minor laws they are causing no harm to anything or anyone, however that is not the case. American citizens need to understand that whether they are disobeying a minor law or they are committing a felony, they are still committing a crime. Laws are made to help keep people safe and to keep communities at peace, so law-and-order can be threatened by a minor law just as much as it is threatened by violent crime.
Legal consciousness refers to how people’s different conceptions of law determine whether they mobilize or resist the law (SOC216, Jan. 26). Susan S. Silbey and Patricia Ewick disclose three narratives of how people perceive the law: before the law, with the law and up against the law (2000). Individuals who are before the law fundamentally treat legality as an objective realm that is removed from their ordinary social lives (Silbey and Ewick 2000). They believe that the law is a hierarchical classification of rules that is both majestic and impartial (Silbey and Ewick 2000). In regards to ‘with the law’, legality is described and played as a game, in which existing rules can be arrayed accordingly and new rules can be invented in order to serve the individual’s interests (Silbey and Ewick 2000). Legality is described as a “terrain for tactical encounters” where
The criminal justice field faces the challenges of getting criminals off the streets, and prosecuting them, while using limited funds and manpower. Citizens expect results, and want to feel safe when they are in their own neighborhood. On the other hand, citizens in our democratic country expect people to be treated fairly, and feel the need to make sure that no innocent people are wrongly sent to jail. It is a balancing act of keeping the community safe on one hand, and on the other, making sure that no one’s rights are violated. It is like being told to do a job, but then having all these rules and obstacles you have to navigate around in order to do your job. The following paper is a study of the differences between due process, and crime control model, as well as assessing which one is more effective with stopping crime in today’s world.
With the introduction of the automobile in the early 1900s, laws have been instituted to protect drivers on the road. With these laws come lawbreakers who put their agenda in front of the well being of others. Tens of thousands of lives have been lost. billions of dollars have been spent, and pollution has grown exponentially because of this. drivers travelling at high speeds on roads (Hartman).
The purpose of the law was to protect the general public from repeat offenders and effectively “deter” criminals (Jones 2012). The three-strikes law was seen as necessary in states because of a movement referred to as the victims’ movement. The movement brought violent and sex offenders into the public’s attention. As a result, the states created the three-strikes law in order to “silence” the public (Jones 2012). However, the three strikes law doesn’t come without certain consequences, such as over-crowded prison facilities and increase in cost (Jones 2012). The three strike law purpose was to deter crime in the United States; however, research has concluded that the law has not in fact deter crime. For instance, in California the crime rate by 13.8 percent; however, the crime rate declined prior the enactment of the three-strikes law (Jones 2012). The three strikes law also did not display a significant drop in crime rates in populous cities (Jones 2012). One study researched the violent crimes in states that had similar three-strikes laws as those in California and states that did not have a three-strike law. Figure one in the research charted the crime rates in states with a three-strikes law and figure two charted the crime rates in states without a three-strikes law. The two figures verify that the three-strikes law does not contribute to the decline in crime rates because the rate for crime in the
3: Kovandzic, Tomislav V., Sloan,John J., I.,II, and Lynne M. Vieraitis. ""STRIKING OUT" AS CRIME REDUCTION POLICY: THE IMPACT OF "THREE STRIKES" LAWS ON CRIME RATES IN U.S. CITIES." Justice Quarterly : JQ 21.2 (2004): 207-39. ProQuest. Web. 16 Feb. 2014.
The individuals within our society have allowed we the people to assess and measure the level of focus and implementation of our justice system to remedy the modern day crime which conflict with the very existence of our social order. Enlightening us to the devices that will further, establish the order of our society, resides in our ability to observe the Individual’s rights for public order.
The basis of criminal justice in the United States is one founded on both the rights of the individual and the democratic order of the people. Evinced through the myriad forms whereby liberty and equity marry into the mores of society to form the ethos of a people. However, these two systems of justice are rife with conflicts too. With the challenges of determining prevailing worth in public order and individual rights coming down to the best service of justice for society. Bearing a perpetual eye to their manifestations by the truth of how "the trade-off between freedom and security, so often proposed so seductively, very often leads to the loss of both" (Hitchens, 2003, para. 5).
Lott, Jr. John R. More Gun Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000. Print.
The social construction of myths of crime and criminal justice seems to follow a series of recurrent patterns. These patterns allow for an unprecedented amount of social attention to be focused upon a few isolated criminal events or issues. This attention is promoted by intense, but often brief, mass media coverage of a select problem. Intense social concern of an issue is achieved by a variety of means from the mass media, government, law enforcement officials, interpersonal communications, and the interests of reform groups whom all play major roles in focusing the publics attention on select so...
One time when I was walking home from the store a guy was driving at least 10 miles over the speed limit in a school zone. The guy came to a red light and he tried to stop but did not succeed as the child was crossing the street the guy came up trying to stop but instead hit the child. Speeding happens everyday and everyday some child or even adult gets hurt from a speeding car, maybe that guy was drunk or just being irresponsible. Everyday people see each other dropping trash on the ground and no one is willing to pick it up even if it is there’s or not. Everyone is a danger in this world and everyone is a danger to the
Menninger's ideas are directed toward a wide audience of generally law-abiding citizens. This article first appeared in Harper's Magazine, a general-interest magazine that provides collections of essays and fiction. The type of person who would read a magazine such as this would probably be an educated person who is interested in the affairs of the world around them. Menninger reveals his impression of the audience in his introduction, where he says, "And from these offenses the average citizen, including the reader, is deterred by quite different restraints" (537). Armed with this vision of his audience, he presents his argument in a logical, authoritative tone that invites the reader to make the inevitable conclusion that Menninger is right.
Kelling and Catherine Coles, released the definitive work on the broken windows theory: Fixing Broken Windows - Restoring Order and Reducing Crime in Our Communities. In this work, the authors would go further, and demonstrate the causal relationship between violent crime and the not prosecution to misdemeanors. As the disorder leads to crime, tolerance for petty crimes and misdemeanors, inevitably leads to violent crime. The authors attribute the original “growth of disorder” in the 1960’s due the valorization and combination of decriminalization of public drunkenness and deinstitutionalize the mentally ill. The main window for this backspace in America were vagrancy and loitering laws. These both, opened a gap for the drunks and panhandlers take back the streets second the
On top of that, these type of people use their cellphone, eat, don't wear seat belts, or drunk while they are driving. But these people don't realize that doing those minor thing can cause them severe pains or even deaths. There are millions of peoples are getting killed and injured every year because of car accident. I think if everyone use the traffic rules, all
The definition of justice and the means by which it must be distributed differ depending on an individual’s background, culture, and own personal morals. As a country of many individualistic citizens, the United States has always tried its best to protect, but not coddle, its people in this area. Therefore, the criminal justice history of the United States is quite extensive and diverse; with each introduction of a new era, more modern technologies and ideals are incorporated into government, all with American citizens’ best interests in mind.
The main form of reckless driving that a large amount of people are aware of is drinking and driving. When an individual is under the influence while driving, it can become detrimental in regards to other lives, not just to the individual behind the wheel because it impairs the driver 's ability to make quick and smart decisions. Within the last year there was a 15 year old boy who had lost his life due to driving under the influence. Somehow the boy had managed to veer off the road and wrap his car around a pole and into a Whataburger, not only taking his own life but also risking the lives of anyone who was inside the restaurant. The fact that he was drinking impaired his ability to drive, thus resulting in not having control of his vehicle. Another major issue of reckless driving is speeding. Many times drivers will reach dangerous speeds on the road as the result of racing. Once reaching the high speeds, the individual is risking the amount of control they have over the car. When lacking control of the vehicle the said person is