Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Role of a jury in a criminal trial
Role of jurors in the crown court
Role of a jury in a criminal trial
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
As a juror in any court case it would be difficult to come to one conclusion with twelve different opinions. The fictional play Twelve Angry Men proved this to be true, however, the jurors in the Sandusky trial found it relatively easy to decide on a verdict. Jerry Sandusky, former Penn State assistant football coach and founder of the 2nd Mile charity, was convicted of fifty-two accounts of child molestation. Although members of the jury would like to discuss every aspect of the case, in the end, convicting Sandusky guilty would be a simple task. Jerry Sandusky seemed obviously guilty to most people, but certain details of the case may have caused dispute between the jurors. Kevin Johnson, author of “Sandusky Jury Hears Testimony”, stated, “The first of the eight victims said he suffered for five years of being forced into about fifty sexual encounters by Sandusky. Now twenty-eight, the witness said his interactions with Sandusky escalated from friendly tips and ‘soap battles’ in the showers of a Penn State locker room to inappropriate touching, then in 1997 veered into dozens of incidents of oral sex” (1). Along with the first boy, others came forward and admitted to being victims of Sandusky’s abuse, and they all had similar stories. People later came forward and admitted to seeing Sandusky performing these acts, but failed to report them. An instance of this happening occurred when “a janitor admitted to seeing Sandusky sexually offending a young boy in the locker room, but did not report it at the time” (Johnson “Sandusky Abuse Trial Moves Quickly” 1). Because the janitor did not report what he saw at this time, it weakened the credibility of his testimony. Another controversial point was brought about during the trial. I... ... middle of paper ... ...l Edition. Web. 23 Apr. 2014. Herman H. “Local consultant readers opinion on Sandusky jury.” Reading Eagle (PA) June 21, 2012: Available from: Newspaper Source, Ipswich, MA, Accessed April 24, 2014 “Jerry Sandusky Trial: Many Jurors Have Penn State Tries.” NBC News. N.p., n.d. Web. 23 Apr. 2014. Kevin JohnsonUSA, TODAY. "Nine jurors selected for Sandusky's trial." USA Today n.d.: MAS Ultra - School Edition. Web. 14 Apr. 2014. Kevin JohnsonUSA, TODAY. "Sandusky abuse trial moves quickly." USA Today n.d.: MAS Ultra - School Edition. Web. 14 Apr. 2014. Kevin JohnsonUSA, TODAY. "Sandusky jury hears testimony." USA Today n.d.: MAS Ultra - School Edition. Web. 23 Apr. 2014. Price, S. L. “We are still...Penn State.” Sports Illustrated 117.18 (2012): 60. MAS Ultra-School Edition. Web. 15 Apr. 2014. Rose, Reginald. Twelve Angry Men. New York: Penguin, 2006. Print.
This case involves a sophomore at a high school named Christine Franklin, who alleged that she was sexually harassed and abused by a teacher and sports coach by the name of Andrew Hill. These allegations were occurring from 1986-1988, a total of two years. These allegations included Hill having explicit conversations with Franklin, forcing her to kiss him, and forceful intercourse on school grounds. Franklin claimed that she let teachers and administrators know about the harassment and that other students were going through the same harassment. The result of telling the teachers and administrators was that nothing was done about the situation and even encouraged Franklin not
Tresniowski, AlexHelling, SteveTauber, Michelle. "Shocking Verdict!." People 77.2 (2011): 84. MAS Ultra - School Edition.
Linder, Douglas O. "The Trial of O. J. Simpson." The Trial of O. J. Simpson. N.p., n.d. Web. 19 Apr.
Wolff, AlexanderGAGNE, MATT. "Is This The End For PENN STATE? (Cover Story)." Sports Illustrated 117.4 (2012): 38. MAS Ultra - School Edition. Web. 14 Apr. 2014.
Bicks, M. (Director). (2004). In the jury room: The State of Ohio vs Mark Ducic: ABC News.
Juror Eight stood up for what he believed in against eleven other jurors, and eventually influenced them all to reach the verdict of not-guilty. At the end of the case, when the jury is about to come to a final decision, Juror Eight says to Juror Three “It’s not your boy. He’s somebody else.
Twelve angry men is a play about twelve jurors who have to decide if the defendant is guilty of murdering his father, the play consist of many themes including prejudice, intolerance, justice , and courage. The play begins with a judge explaining to the jurors their job and how in order for the boy to be sent to death the vote must be unanimous. The jurors are then locked into a small room on a hot summer day. At first, it seems as though the verdict is obvious until juror eight decides to vote not guilty. From that moment on, the characters begin to show their true colors. Some of the characters appear to be biased and prejudice while others just want justice and the truth. Twelve Angry Men Despite many of the negative qualities we see
In the United States, jury trials are an important part of our court system. We rely heavily on the jury to decide the fate of the accused. We don’t give a second thought to having a jury trial now, but they were not always the ‘norm’.
10. Adam Liptak. “Inviting TV Into Jury Room in a Capital Case,” New York Times, 26
In 1959, two young African American boys, James Hanover (9) and David “Fuzzy” Simpson (7) were charged with molestation of a young white girl. The case is known as “The Kissing Case”, a case that has been much forgotten and to some even unheard. While there were many issues within the case, the main factor that changed the young boys’ lives forever was the simple fact that they were innocent. Some of the problems in this case are issues that are judicial system still seem unfit to get right in many cases.
In the play “Twelve Angry men”, the story line presents a variety of perspectives and opinions between twelve very different men. Some are more likely to be pointed out as prejudice, and others are more focused on reaching fair justice. Clearly, it is quite difficult for different people to vote ‘guilty’ or ‘not guilty’ in unity when coming to a fair decision. In all of the twelve jurors, I have chosen Juror 3 and Juror 8 for contrast and comparison. I believe that Juror number 3 is a very opinionated man, with more differences than similarities comparing with Juror number 8.
Jerry Sandusky is a child rapist that had the opportunity to sexually assault children behind the cover of very influential people of a world class university in State College Pennsylvania. Sandusky joined the coaching staff at Penn State in 1969 and retired in 1999 (Crandall, Parnell & Spillman, 2013). Jerry Sandusky is founder of the charitable organization for disadvantaged youth called The Second Mile that was founded in 1977. Unfortunately, Jerry was able to sexually assault children at the university as well as other places because of his stature within the community of State College (Crandall, Parnell & Spillman, 2013). It was discovered that Penn State University President Graham Spanier, Senior Vice President-Finance and Business Gary
The jurors had several conflicts in disagreeing with each other and it didn't help that they would shout over one another. The very first conflict is when juror 8 voted not guilty against the 11 guilty votes. The other 11 jurors don't seem to want to hear this man out; they don't want to hear why he has voted not guilty. Some of these men, jurors 3 and 7, just want to get this case over with so they can get on with their lives. They don't think it is imperative enough to look over the evidence and put themselves in the place of the defendant. They get upset with this man and try to get him to vote guilty.
Imagine being a black teenager in the south amid the great depression. It was hard enough for whites to find jobs during this time; I can’t even begin to fathom what it would be like being black seeking a job. Many blacks sought hoboing as a common pastime seeing it as an adventure to get them from one small job to another. And this is where the story of the Scottsboro Boys begins.
In Reginald Rose’s play “Twelve Angry Men”, a group of jurors must determine the innocence or guilt of a boy accused of murdering his father. The jurors display a medley of demeanors, many of them armed with their own prejudices and motivations. In the case of juror eleven, his motivation is his dedication to the task at hand.