Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A raisin in the sun critical analysis
Problems with racism in literature
Essays of a raisin in the sun
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the American society of the 1950s, prevalence of discrimination strongly existed against colored people and women. To speak of this injustice, Lorraine Hansberry wrote a drama which revolved around characters whose such views plagued the lives of others. In the drama, A Raisin in the Sun, Lorraine Hansberry exposes the presence of oppression and white supremacy through the characters of George Murchison, Mrs. Johnson, and Mr. Linder. Although George Murchison is depicted as a colored man, Hansberry still utilizes him to show the prevalence of white supremacy and oppression in the black community through his support of assimilation and his contempt for other blacks. During a conversation between her and her mother, Beneatha Younger states, …show more content…
“[F]irst I’m going to be a doctor”. Then, she reveals that George Murchison discourages her dream to become a doctor and “still thinks that’s pretty funny” (Hansberry I. i). Without the consideration of Beneatha’s emotions, George oppresses her and her dream because he envisions that all women should to assimilate to the American culture and become subservient to men. For example, in the American culture of the 1950s, women only had jobs doing domestic works or nursing. Furthermore, George underestimates Beneatha’s capability of becoming a doctor and overcoming the standards society has set for women. When Beneatha informs her mother about her date, she describes George and his family as “honest-to-God-real-live-rich colored people” and states that “the only people in the world more snobbish than rich white people are rich colored people” like George (Hansberry I. i). Although George has become wealthy, his wealth does not impress Beneatha because she realizes that it has changed his personality. In fact, Beneatha reveals that George has become an assimilationist and has climbed up the social ladder. As a result, he has become judgmental toward the lower classes of the black community. As Beneatha tries to connect to her heritage in an expressive dance, George arrives to take her out on a date. Because Beneatha is not assimilating to the American culture but instead is becoming aware of her heritage, George has become angered and frustrated toward her. Additionally, he believes that the African heritage is centered around “a bunch of raggedy-a[**]ed spirituals” and stories about “the great . . . empires[,] . . . civilizations[,] . . . sculpture [and] . . . poetry” and “some grass huts” (Hansberry II. i). By his own words, George voices his support of assimilation to the American culture because he believes that gaining knowledge of his African heritage is just a sentimental waste of time. Therefore, George oppresses Beneatha’s engagement in her own heritage. As a result of the carefully chosen characterization of Mrs.
Johnson, Hansberry reveals the major theme of white supremacy through segregation and oppression and discouragement of the Younger family’s dreams. As Beneatha strolled into the apartment and speaks only a few words to Mrs. Johnson, Mrs. Johnson voices, “[S]ometimes she [Beneatha] acts like ain’t got time to pass the time of day with nobody ain’t been to college . . . you know how some of our young people gets when they get a little education” (Hansberry II. ii). Through responses like these, Mrs. Johnson displays herself as hypocritical. Though she states that she is not criticizing Beneatha, other statements from her indeed support that she is critiquing Beneatha. Above all, Mrs. Johnson oppresses Beneatha’s dream to be successful and also discourages Beneatha’s pride in being educated. In addition, Mrs. Johnson voices that colored people should not aim for something higher in life. During her conversation with the Youngers, Mrs. Johnson criticizes them once again by saying they were “one proud-acting bunch of colored folks” and then supports her argument by quoting Booker T. Washington who once stated, “‘Education has spoiled many a good plow hand’” (Hansberry II. ii). By her statements, Mrs. Johnson shows her insincerity for the feelings of others. For instance, she insults Beneatha’s desire to become educated and insists that Walter having the job of a chauffeur monitors Booker T. Washington’s knowledge that only few colored people should become educated. When talking to the Youngers, Mrs. Johnson exclaims, “Lord—I bet this time next month y’all’s names will have been in the papers plenty—‘NEGROES INVADE CLYBOURNE PARK—BOMBED!’” (Hansberry II. ii). To further emphasize the prevalence of racial tension in society, Mrs. Johnson warns the Youngers of the consequences that could come when the family moves into the white neighborhood. Moreover, she supports her claim that colored people should
assimilate to society and not try to achieve big dreams in life. Though the Youngers are not pushed back by her, Mrs. Johnson tries to discourage and oppress all of their dreams. Through the character of Mr. Karl Lindner, chairman of the Welcoming Committee of Clybourne Park, and his racial discrimination, Hansberry presents the major theme of oppression of the Younger’s dreams and supremacy of the white race. When Mr. Lindner offers the Youngers money for the home that they had recently purchased in Clybourne Park, he states he must do this because “people get along better, take more of a common interest in the life of the community, when they share a common background”. In addition, he believes that the concept has nothing to do with “race prejudice” but that “Negro families are happier when they live in their own communities” (Hansberry II. iii). By offering to buy the house back from the Youngers, Mr. Lindner reveals that he wants Clybourne Park to be free of colored people. Because Mr. Lindner strongly denies that racial discrimination exists, he declares that the Welcoming Committee’s decision has nothing to do with racism. Truly, Mr. Lindner is blinded by the belief that colored families are happier when they are surrounded by their own kind, but the Youngers solely desire to provide better living circumstances that their old apartment has not provided for them. To discourage the Younger’s determination to move into Clybourne Park, Mr. Lindner claims that colored people “aren’t wanted” and some white people “feel that their whole way of life and everything they’ve worked for is threatened”. (Hansberry II. ii). Although previously Mr. Lindner presented the committee’s offer in a deceptively kind manner, he now bluntly states that colored people are not wanted in Clybourne Park. Ironically, he also proclaims that colored people threaten white people when they move into the neighborhoods. Instead, the honest statement would be that colored families feel threatened and discriminated by white people, much like what Mr. Lindner treated the Youngers. When Walter Lee Younger presents his speech and declines Mr. Lindner and the Welcoming Committee’s offer, Mr. Lindner is dumbfounded and questions Walter’s competence by asking Mama Younger “to appeal” because he believes that she is “older and wiser and understands things better” than Walter. (Hansberry II. iii). By ignoring Walter’s request and requiring Mama Younger to make the final, Mr. Lindner talks condescendingly toward Walter and undermines Walter’s integrity. Intentionally, Mr. Lindner does not believe Walter’s plea because he desires to completely discourage black people’s self-determination to make lives better for themselves and their families. In the drama, A Raisin in the Sun, Lorraine Hansberry depicts the occurrence of white superiority as well as oppression with the assistance of the detailed representation of the characters of George Murchison, Mrs. Johnson, and Mr. Linder. Through the characters’ support of discriminatory acts and discouragement, the Youngers’ dreams, self-motivation, and well-being are partially destroyed and their lives are filled with overwhelming hardships. Even through the oppression and discrimination that they faced, the Youngers overcame the standards of society.
One of the first ideas mentioned in this play, A Raisin In the Sun, is about money. The Younger's end up with no money because of Walter's obsession with it. When Walter decides not to take the extra money he is offered it helps prove Hansberry's theme. Her theme is that money can't buy happiness. This can be seen in Walter's actions throughout the play.
constant comparison and view of blacks vs. whites in the novel. “ To show too much intelligence
Each character in A Raisin in the Sun has grown through out the play. The first character I will begin to talk about is Walter Lee Younger (brother). He is Passionate, ambitious, and bursting with the energy of his dreams, Walter Lee is a desperate man, influenced by with poverty and prejudice, and obsessed with a business idea that he thinks will solve all of his problems. He believes that through his business idea, he will collect all the money he will ever need. Once he has done so, he will improve himself socially and be able to impress others.
“add quote” (Petry, pg ). Giddings affirms Lutie’s logic as to why Black people are disadvantaged through white supremacy. Giddings states, “add quote” (Giddings, pg ). This vicious cycle of maintaining white supremacy through the deprivation of the African American people affects Lutie and other characters such as her son, Bub, and building supervisor known as Super.
Considering the circumstance of racial inequality during the time of this novel many blacks were the target of crime and hatred. Aside from an incident in his youth, The Ex-Colored Man avoids coming in contact with “brutality and savagery” inflicted on the black race (Johnson 101). Perhaps this is a result of his superficial white appearance as a mulatto. During one of his travels, the narrator observes a Southern lynching in which he describes the sight of “slowly burning t...
Hansberry promotes a sense of African heritage through her character, Beneatha. She characterizes Beneatha as a college student struggling to find her identity, who tries to achieve such by getting in touch with her roots. The author expresses Beneatha’s struggle with the arguments between her and the rest of her family, namely her mother, Lena. Beneatha tries to express her opinions and ideas, yet because she is the youngest in the household, she tends to feel confined and restricted. Hansberry states Beneatha’s conflict when she writes “Why? Why can’t I say what I want to around here like everybody else?” (Hansberry 39). This statement reveals how Beneatha feels as though her family lacks an understanding of her feelings as well as an appreciation of her opinion, thus leading to her feeling of needing to discover herself. Only when she begins to embrace the idea of returning to her African roots, an idea first given to her by the African exchange student, Asagai, does Beneatha’s mood appear happier and lighter. Upon Asagai’s presentation of a traditional Nigerian dress to her, Beneatha seems elated, and begins to contemplate wearing her natural hair after he comments “You wear it well—very well—mutilated hair and all” (Hansberry 48). Although, Beneatha’s happiness may in some cases be attributed to possible infatuation, Hansberry shows her true passio...
A 14-year-old African American boy was kidnapped, tortured, and then shot in the head by two older white men. His body was wrapped in bob wire and found in the bank of the Tallahatchie River. It is said their “motive” to killing this young child was because he whistled at the wife of one of the two men. His body was then put on display by his mother for everyone to see the horrible things that were done to her son. (American Experience) For me, this is directly related to the Hansberry’s political philosophy. Emmett Till’s murder was a huge eye opener for this country. It showed the true hate a disgust that people actually held inside of them against the black race. People couldn’t ignore this just like they couldn’t ignore A Raisin in the Sun when it was released. The biggest factor of this was that his mom put his mutilated body on display for everyone to see and take in. The killing of her son, was almost as if he was everybody’s son in the black community. He was fourteen, and there were groups of young boys that were seventeen and eighteen becoming scared of their own lives. The death of Emmett Till although it was a tragedy, it made for a better tomorrow. Hansberry took the play and the book and made a statement that the world really couldn’t ignore. The things that were being done to black people strictly because of the color of their skin was upsetting. After the murder of Emmett Till, you had communities marching, getting their voice out there, and basically standing up for all their own rights. The Younger’s weren’t a family who dealt with poverty on a high scale. So they was looked at in a way where, here is an average black family who can’t succeed due to their environment not letting them. Hansberry to me is somebody who wants her statement to make an impact such as Emmett Till’s
The author distinguishes white people as privileged and respectful compare to mulattos and blacks. In the racial society, white people have the right to get any high-class position in job or live any places. In the story, all white characters are noble such as Judge Straight lawyer, Doctor Green, business-man George, and former slaveholder Mrs. Tryon. Moreover, the author also states the racial distinction of whites on mulattos. For example, when Dr. Green talks to Tryon, “‘The niggers,’…, ‘are getting mighty trifling since they’ve been freed. Before the war, that boy would have been around there and back before you could say Jack Robinson; now, the lazy rascal takes his time just like a white man.’ ” (73) Additionally, in the old society, most white people often disdained and looked down on mulattos. Even though there were some whites respected colored people friendly, there were no way for colored people to stand parallel with whites’ high class positions. The story has demonstrations that Judge Straight accepted John as his assistant, Mrs. Tryon honor interviewed Rena, and George finally changed and decided to marry Rena; however, the discrimination is inevitable. For example, when Mrs. Tryon heard Rena was colored, she was disappointed. “The lady, who had been studying her as closely as good manners would permit, sighed regretfully.” (161) There, Mrs. Tryon might have a good plan for Rena, but the racial society would not accept; since Rena was a mulatto, Mrs. Tryon could not do anything to help Rena in white social life. The racial circumstance does not only apply on mulattos, but it also expresses the suffering of black people.
In Lorraine Hansberry “A Raisin in the Sun”, the issues of racial discrimination, the debate of heroism, and criticism is vividly displayed. The play, which was written in the late 1950’s presents itself in a realistic discerning matter that implicates the racial division among the black family and white America. The play insinuates Walters’s heroism as well because of the black family’s struggle not to become discouraged in trying to obtain the world riches and still maintaining human dignity. When Hansberry wrote “A Raisin in the Sun”, many critics questioned the motive behind her play because it showed the America the world wants to grow oblivious to. This presents the reality of racial discrimination and heroism for the black man among
In the play, Hansberry portrayed African American’s as having limited job options because of their race. Which is why, Walter worked as a chauffeur and Ruth was a maid. The set availability of career choices meant only having a limited amount of income. The five family members; grandma Lena, sister Berneatha, father Walter, mother Ruth and son Travis, all lived under one roof in a small apartment with confined living space. Three generations living together meant that they had to share a two bedroom apartment and also share the hall bathroom with the rest of the families in the complex (Domina 20). Walter reveals his feelings that he believes he is a failure by saying, “I got a boy who sleeps in the living room. . . and all I got to give him is stories about how rich white people are” (Hansberry 950). In Teron McGrew’s article "The History of Residential Segregation in the United States and Title VIII” he says Marzenbaum, a creator of the zoning laws, thought that the single family home should be the main housing throughout the country and the owner could have a small garden with a space that is available to fresh air and sunlight (23). Hansberry must have read this statement in light of the fact that in the play when Lena looks for a house, she wanted the exact same features; she wants a normal house without her race interfering with her opportunities. The Younger’s dream of owning a standard home and being free from their rundown rental apartment came true but not without a fight from zoning, covenants, and racial steering
There are several generations of women that reside in the Younger apartment. Hansberry uses characterization to demonstrate each generation’s different perspective of themselves as a woman. Mama is a faithful wife, who believes a woman should always listen to her husband because he is the provider for the family and the head of the household. Ruth is also characterized as a woman of good faith. She is vocal enough to tell Mama to follow her dreams, but she does not have enough self-assurance to tell herself to do the same. Beneatha is the complete antithesis of the two older Younger women. Bennie is feisty, Afrocentric, and self-righteous. “Beneatha has embraced some of the frivolous values and activities frequently associated with those American college students who are immature and pampered” (Turner). She has evolved from a woman of good faith into a woman without morals and responds to male instruction as if they were all imbeciles. While Bennie is parading around in her natural attire, George Murchison superciliously says, “Oh, don’t be so proud of yourself, Bennie—just because you look eccentric. Get dressed.”(Hansberry 984). Immediately, Bennie thrashes through Murchison with words, challenging his response to...
In this article, Bernstein presents the argument that opposing interpretations of the play can lead to racist and non-racist perceptions. Bernstein suggests that A Raisin in the Sun can be seen as either universal between cultures or specifically black. How one interprets Hansberry’s portrayal of politics and black culture determines their point of view. Bernstein also suggests that by ignoring such politics and only acknowledging black culture, black audience members place themselves in a “fishbowl.”
George and Beneatha are talking and George says. “Let’s face it, baby, your heritage is nothing but a bunch of raggedy-assed spirituals and some grass huts!” and Beneatha goes to say GRASS HUTS!…See there…you are standing there in your splendid ignorance talking about people who were the first to smelt iron on the face of the earth!” As readers we can see that Hansberry contrasts George's view on African identity with Beneatha's. Also the conversation can display that there are lots of different perspectives on this issue within the black community. By giving us these sorts of complex perspectives Hansberry makes the play truly universal.
The social institutions described by Wright in the novel were very detailed. During the 1930’s, a symbolic code that was very common on black servants was one who was humble, clownish and ignorant. This helped elevate the whites rage, and boost the propagated images of black Americans. The newsreel depicted the entertainments and scandals of the ultra-rich. This newsreel was followed by a movie that portrayed black people as exotic, primitive savages. Together, these two films reflected an exaggerated portrait of racist symbolic codes. White society has control over the social dilogue that determines the meaning of the color of Bigger's skin and identity. "Blackness" is portayed as dangerous, savage, and inferior to "whiteness."
The violence of racism is alluded to when Mrs. Johnson speaks of the “white folks [who] poisoned some of the herd” of some neighboring Blacks (Walker 125). The woman with red and white sandals moves the instant the large Black man seated himself on the other end of the seat on which she was perched. This action garnered the woman a look of approbation from Mrs. Chestny (O’Connor 235-36). Mrs. Chestny displays her disapproval of the Black woman having settled herself on the same seat as Julian by turning ashen faced (239). When Mrs. Chestny realizes that the large Black woman is wearing the same hat she has donned, she becomes entertained and smiles “as if the woman were a monkey that had stolen her hat (240). The most conspicuous racist action in O’Connor’s story is Mrs. Chestny’s attempt to present the Black boy (Carver) with a penny after he and his mother exit the bus. Although it was her “natural gesture” to offer a nickel, she had been unable to find a nickel in her purse and opted, instead, for the only small coin she could find. Despite Julian’s protestations against such an action, his mother proceeded to offer the penny to the young boy. The reaction from his mother was immediate and violent, resulting in Mrs. Chestny being attacked