A Modest Proposal Rhetorical Analysis

971 Words2 Pages

Jonathan Swift’s “A Modest Proposal” uncovers the laxity of British and Irish Gentry towards the increasing poverty in Ireland and the exploitation of the Irish. With its metaphors that depicts cannibalism as an acceptable solution to hunger, ‘modest’ can only be seen as an euphemism for this egregious suggestion. This satire dictates an economically insightful proposal that alleviate poor parents of their ‘unwanted bastards’. As a result of this proposal, the outcome suggests to hinder children from being an excessive liability to the public, which then will be beneficial. With mathematical and economical reasoning, the dehumanization, devouring and devaluing of human life only speaks to criticize the British’s negligence. Moreover, “A Modest …show more content…

An attempt to reflect how the Irish were exploited, Swift uses an analogy of animal husbandry throughout this story. As a result, its effect presents the poor people as a detestable burden to the state. They reproduce an excessive amount of children that they cannot support while begging for sustenance to help themselves and their children; in the end, the children grow up either resorting to begging themselves or take up a life of thievery. The children are compared to animals and teenagers are seen as savages, and more of an encumbrance to the public and that without proper training serves no value. In addition the analogy incorporates economics and numbers to describe this proposal as rational thinking. Nay, it only serves to be irrational to depict human life to be inferior to animals. Swift’s narrator offers families to become capital units for the greater good of the kingdom. With their willingness to corporate with this proposal, it will strengthen and solve the problems of starvation, cultural depletion and economic recession. A part of this solution involves the dehumanization of babies and women. Helpless infants are treated as livestock and as a valuable commodity; a metaphor describing the potential of the British devouring the future of the Irish people. The word devour takes on a figurative and literal …show more content…

The projector offers sarcastic remarks towards the British to agree with this proposal criticizing the English by stating “a country would be glad to eat up our whole nation.” This direct criticism is presented in a way that is not offensive. Not to mention, Swift gives indication of his real life, having sent works to publications—prior to this satire—about the state of Ireland, only not to be taken seriously. Again, as a result to not receiving any attention he satirizes this disregard and mistreatment through this suggestion. The British’s institutionalization of the Irish people by pilfering their lands; destroying their culture and people by indoctrinating their beliefs and enforcing British culture, while implanting high rents and taxes through absentee, negligent landlords and providing little to no sustenance and provisions for the people of Ireland to survive caused the country to grow poor. Henceforth, for poor people, begging becomes a legal occupation to survive. The proposal uses common-wealth as a pun; that is Ireland being a part of the British Commonwealth above all the wealth becoming common if the public is to agree with this suggestion. For the most part, the established British class system does not offer a common-wealth, due to wealth belonging to the aristocracy and the upper

Open Document