In the 1729 pamphlet “A Modest Proposal” Jonathan Swift uses satire to propose a solution for the hunger and oppression in Ireland in that day, particularly among Irish Catholics. At that time, although Catholics made up around eighty percent of the population in Ireland, they owned only one third of the land, the rest being owned by English protestants. Most of the hunger and starvation in this, the 18th century, came from mid-17th century Oliver Cromwell. Cromwell waged a war to conquer the Irish who were rebelling against England. To emphasize his position, Cromwell and his men set fire to the earth, crops, and food stores, making it extremely difficult to grow food. The effects of that war lasted for years afterwards, and the Catholics …show more content…
were getting the worst of it. Swift’s pamphlet came up with a “plan” to take care of this problem. His proposal was for starving farmers’ wives to fatten up their malnourished children until the age of one, and then sell them to the meat market, saving themselves from the costs of raising a child, and improving the culinary experience of the wealthier people. This gruesome proposal was not intended to be taken seriously at all, but to draw attention from the English aristocracy towards the oppression and food shortage plaguing the Irish. Many people are of the opinion that Swift’s blatant use of satire was too absurd or ridiculous, however this is not so. Swift’s satire is used in a persuasive manner that thoroughly gets his point across. Swift used his satire because the Irish were oppressed.
The Irish Catholics, although they made up most of the population, were very poor. The English protestants had taken full charge of the country, owning almost all the land and fields. Because of the food shortage, Catholic parents were forced to send their children to protestant schools, just so they could get a daily meal. In this way, the Catholics felt like they were “feeding” their children to this other religion, a point that Swift boldly brought across in his pamphlet. This was regarded as rather a joke among the English, not quite the effect he had been looking for. The Irish, although they would never dream to eat their children, were almost hungry enough …show more content…
to! Jonathan swift also used satire because the English were not helping. No one seemed to care about the unfair treatment of the native Irishmen. The Irish themselves read the pamphlet and laughed bitterly, realizing how bad of a situation they were in. The English landowners, however, brushed it aside as more whining. A pamphlet like his, which brought to light so much starvation was intended to shock or outrage the gentlemen and women of England, to prompt someone to do something about it, but the people read the economic part of it as a jolly good joke, and ignored any critiques it contained. The government simply refused to help the poverty-stricken Catholics. Swift’s satire was just gruesome enough for people to take note of it, and for some to be utterly revolted by it, but his points were driven home.
His points about the lack of food were emphasized by his ideas to eat young children as meat. This pamphlet has more in common with our era than one might think. Upon the first read, his plan was utterly shocking, if one were to take him seriously. In today’s world, though, Americans are continually doing a very similar thing, and thinking nothing of it. Perhaps we are not so desperate for food, but mothers are often desperate for freedom, and would gladly sacrifice their unborn child for just that. Does Swift’s plan still seem gruesome? It
should. Jonathan Swift wrote the satire-filled pamphlet “A Modest Proposal” in Ireland in 1729, in an effort to regain the rights and health of the native Irish Catholics. His plan to raise the economic status of the poor was balanced by his plan to get children out from underfoot. It was never intended to be taken seriously in that respect, but to draw attention to the unfair treatment of the Irish Catholics. His gruesome details were considered a funny joke, but drove his point deep. Although his efforts were relatively ignored at the time, he is now well known for his attempt.
The issue that Swift is addressing is the fact that there are too many poor children in Dublin and that they are becoming such a huge burden for all the poor mothers or parents of the country. Swift then creates his own solution to the problem. He proposes that all poor children who are around one year of age, be cooked and eaten by the people of Dublin, preferably the poor. With this solution, he argues that it will eventually put an end to the overpopulation of the poor young children and it will satisfy the hunger for all the other people. Crazy right?
In Swift’s satirical essay he stated the main issue to be the hunger and starvation of Irish country and their lack of money to support oneself. He said the complication was they themselves don’t have food, to many families in poverty, and that the Englishman took their land and charging high prices for rent. Swift makes this argument because he too is an Irish men and he struggles to see his fellow men parish in the streets. He desires his people to stand up against England and take back what’s theirs. He argues that the Irish...
The obvious lack of ethics and morals in this passage cements that this essay is satirical and should not be understood as a legitimate solution to the starvation issue. He later listed the advantages of a system that breeds children for food, these advantages are all very unethical simply based off the fact that they are benefits of eating infants. Swift mentioned ideas including the murder of Catholic babies, eating humans as a fun custom, and giving the poor something of value (their own children). His use of ethos shows the audience that the essay is satirical and emphasizes the extreme ridiculousness of his ideas. Swift’s use of these three devices created a captivating and somewhat humorous satire.
During the 18th century Ireland was in a very serious crisis. Jonathan Swift decides to write “A Modest Proposal” as a satirical response to this crisis. In that essay he gives a solution to each of the problems that Ireland was having during that time. The main points that he wanted to discuss were domestic abuse, overpopulation, poverty, theft, and the lack of food. This crisis led the great nation of Ireland into economic struggles.
Jonathan Swift’s proposal would not make sense ethically to its audience unless the reader had no value for humans. In this case Swift’s proposal would make sense and would be an acceptable proposal to resolve the problems of the poor in Ireland. The following statement, “I have been assured by a very knowing American of my acquaintance in London, that a young healthy child well nursed is at a year old a most delicious, nourishing, and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled; and I make no doubt that it will
In 1729, Jonathan Swift published a pamphlet called “A Modest Proposal”. It is a satirical piece that describes a radical and humorous proposal to a very serious problem. The problem Swift was attacking was the poverty and state of destitution that Ireland was in at the time. Swift wanted to bring attention to the seriousness of the problem and does so by satirically proposing to eat the babies of poor families in order to rid Ireland of poverty. Clearly, this proposal is not to be taken seriously, but merely to prompt others to work to better the state of the nation.
Swift defined satire as; 'A sort of glass wherein the holders do generally discover everybody's face but their own, which is the chief reason for that kind of reception it meets in the world, and that so very few are offended with it. " Swift presents his "Proposal" as an entirely reasonable suggestion to aid the Irish, he enumerates the many benefits, counters the objections many may have, uses rhetoric reasoning and proves his humanitarianism views. Swift has written in considerable detail over the degree of poverty in Ireland, he draws attention to the causes of it obliquely and proves in great detail that his "Proposal" will work and in which ways it does work. Ireland was a colony of England; it was economically, politically and militarily dependent on ... ... middle of paper ... ...
In his satire, A Modest Proposal, Swift utilizes hyperbole and sarcasm to bring awareness of the unacceptable conditions of the Irish poor in the 18th century.
Imagine reading an anonymous work that promotes cannibalism! Swift eventually had to reveal himself and the purpose of his pamphlet, which was to exaggerate the steps necessary to stop the Irish famine and poverty epidemic. A Modest Proposal is almost a scare tactic. It brings attention to the distances people will go to stop hunger and homelessness. The audience of rich, land-owning men were expected to take the text to heart.
...lready devoured most of the parents, seem to have the best title to the children.” He tried to make the parents realize that the present they are living in will become the future of their children. Swift’s use of these appeals helped his audience to take such a ridiculous proposal as something serious. If one could see through the veil created by all the sarcasm and satirical diction they would see a man who only wants to aid his nation in its time of need
Swift explains how selling a marketable child will be profitable and why the people of Dublin are willing butcher children to survive. He does this by saying, “I rather recommend buying the children alive, and dressing them hot from the knife, as we do roasting pigs” (585). Swift uses verbal irony in a powerful way to state that Irish people should not be treated like animals killed as food. Swift points out the famine and the terrible living conditions that are threatening the Irish population by stating that children are a good source of food just like real animals do.... ... middle of paper ...
An Oxford University graduate, Jonathan Swift, in his article, A Modest Proposal, proposes a solution to Irelands growing poverty in the 18th century by proposing the selling and eating of innocent babies. Swift’s purpose is to state the benefits that the poor would gain from selling their one year old children to the wealthy to eat them. He takes on a concerning tone in order to convince the people of Ireland to consider and adopts his obscene plan.
Jonathan Smith goes to extreme measures to explain his new plan to raise the economic wellbeing of his country. He explains what age is too young and what age is too old, in order to eat the tenants children when they are at their prime juiciness. He also gives a list of suggestions on how to cook them, ?A young healthy child well nursed, is, at a year old, a most delicious nourishing and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled, and I make no doubt that it will equally serve in a fricassee, or a ragout.? All of this talk about eating children comes as a surprise because previous to this disturbing suggestion, Swift is ironically discussing the plight of starving beggars in Ireland. The reader is unprepared for the solution that he suggests.
Swift uses sarcasm to make his argument that the Irish should not be ignored by the English. In 1729 Ireland was hit with a potato famine and the commoners were the ones who suffered the most. The elite were never left hungry and did not suffer like the rest; therefore, they took little or no importance about what happen to the commoners and how they lived. He states, “It is a melancholy object to those who walk through this great town or travel in the country, when they see the...
During the 1500’s England’s Protestant King, Henry VIII, ruled Ireland. Over the next several centuries Protestant English became the primary landowners and government officials. They made many laws limiting the rights of the Irish Catholic, making it nearly impossible for any of them to advance. The English thought of the Irish as savages and trash, and forced them to live in deplorable conditions. As a result, many fled Ireland. Those remaining were poor and starving. This was the Ireland Swift was writing about.