A Midsummer Night's Dream Analysis on Love

942 Words2 Pages

In the days of Shakespeare, marriages were not commonly made for love, but rather for power, wealth or even just so that a parent could be assured care at an advanced age. Such marriages were made very young, and most times arranged between the parents of the two who were to be wed, or between the bridegroom and the parents of the bride. In looking at A Midsummer Night’s Dream, this notion is not exempt. In fact, it is almost emphasized throughout the play. Shakespeare’s comedy offers an exposition of a person’s wish for dominance over the emotional states of those that they love, represented by the tandem conflicts that bridge the mortal and supernatural worlds. The more the characters fight to control the affections of their counterparts, the more it becomes clear that they have virtually no control over where the objects of their affection’s own love lies, such as that of Hermia and her father’s wishes, Oberon and Titania, and a role reversal in the case of Helena and Demetrius. Although the play is meant to be as absurdly comedic as possible (and, indeed, even the great trickster Robin Goodfellow apologizes in the end for its ridiculousness), this central theme truly reflects the flavor of a changing era, where outside arrangements of love were beginning to be traded in western Europe for arrangements from the heart. A classic representation of this male wish to control a female’s affections is seen in Hermia’s fight with her father over whom she wishes to marry. Hermia loves Lysander more than anyone else, and yet her father, Egeus, demands that she wed Demetrius instead. When Hermia and her father’s conflict escalates to epic proportions, where it now involves both of the suitors, and Theseus himself, it is the last s... ... middle of paper ... ...ffections, and therefore still is unable to have really any control. In all three of these cases, dominance is wanted by a character over another’s amour, and yet they cannot ever gain a true sense of dominance; Hermia’s father is forced to relent when his daughter is granted permission by Theseus to wed who she wishes instead of who he wishes, Oberon gets what he wants but takes pity on his wife and relinquishes his control, and Helena finally is the apple of Demetrius’s eye but only by the doing of another person. Each of these examples emphasize a central theme, that love is an uncontrollable force for those that wish to control it. This is what Shakespeare tried to get across to his audiences, and is still a relevant fact today. No matter by any means, love is not a force that can be conquered, it is something to be gained, it is that simple.

Open Document